![Open Access](https://i-scholar.in/lib/pkp/templates/images/icons/fulltextgreen.png)
![Restricted Access](https://i-scholar.in/lib/pkp/templates/images/icons/fulltextred.png)
![Open Access](https://i-scholar.in/lib/pkp/templates/images/icons/fulltextgreen.png)
![Open Access](https://i-scholar.in/lib/pkp/templates/images/icons/fulltext_open_medium.gif)
![Restricted Access](https://i-scholar.in/lib/pkp/templates/images/icons/fulltextred.png)
![Restricted Access](https://i-scholar.in/lib/pkp/templates/images/icons/fulltext_restricted_medium.gif)
Evaluation of Wheat Sowing Technologies under Paddy Residue Conditions
Subscribe/Renew Journal
Evaluation of different wheat sowing technologies under paddy residue conditions were conducted in a combine harvested paddy field. Field of paddy variety PR-121 was harvested with combine. The straw load was 8.22 t/ha at moisture content of 20.2 per cent. Wheat variety (HD 2967) was sown with different farm machines viz., T1: Happy seeder, T2: Spatially modified no till drill and T3: Roto till drill in combine harvested paddy fields. In T1, all the paddy straw was remained in the field itself but spreaded uniformly manually/stubble shaver, in T2, 40 per cent of loose paddy straw removed manually/chopping of paddy straw with paddy straw chopper cum spreader while in T3, there was a partial collection of loose paddy straw manually for better operation of the machines. The grain yield was maximum in treatment T2 (5395.9 kg/ha).
Keywords
Happy Seeder, Spatially Modified no Till Drill, Roto Till Drill, Paddy Straw Chopper Cum Spreader, Stubble Shaver.
Subscription
Login to verify subscription
User
Font Size
Information
![](https://i-scholar.in/public/site/images/abstractview.png)
Abstract Views: 301
![](https://i-scholar.in/public/site/images/pdfview.png)
PDF Views: 0