Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription Access
Open Access Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Restricted Access Subscription Access

Comparision of Lignocaine 5 Per Cent (Hyperbaric) alone and Lignocaine 5 Per Cent (Hyperbaric) with Neostigmine for Spinal Anesthesia


Affiliations
1 Department of Anaesthesiology and Critical Care, Dr. Sampurnanand Medical College, Jodhpur (Rajasthan), India
2 J.L.N. Medical College, Ajmer (Rajasthan), India
     

   Subscribe/Renew Journal


The present study comparision of lignocaine 5 per cent (hyperbaric) alone and lignocaine 5 per cent (hyperbaric) with neostigmine for spinal anaesthesia was conducted in 100 female patients (ASA-I and II) in age group of 20-50 years of average built (46-64 kgs) undergoing various elective gynaecological surgeries. They were randomly divided into two groups. Group-I consisting of 50 patients were given only lignocaine 5 per cent (hyperharic) 2 cc with 1 cc Dextrose 5 per cent and group-II were given lignocaine 5 per cent (hyperbaric) 2 cc with 100 μg of neostrigmine in 1 cc of 5 per cent Dextrose, after subarchnoid block onset of block, duration of block, side effects, heart rate and mean arterial pressure were observed at different time points. Onset was early in group-II (Lignocaine with Neostigmine) 78.80 sec. than group-I (Lignocaine alone) 97.60 seconds. Duration of analgesia and motor block was prolong in group-II1 (Lignocaine with Neostigmine) (180 min. each) than group-I (Lignocaine alone) (90 min. each). High incidence of nausea and vomiting observed in group-II1 (Lignocaine with Neostigmine) (64% and 48%, respectively) than group-I (Lignocaine alone) (20% and 8%, respectively). Both groups are haemodynamically stable.

Keywords

Lignocaine, Neostigmine.
Subscription Login to verify subscription
User
Notifications
Font Size


Abstract Views: 176

PDF Views: 1




  • Comparision of Lignocaine 5 Per Cent (Hyperbaric) alone and Lignocaine 5 Per Cent (Hyperbaric) with Neostigmine for Spinal Anesthesia

Abstract Views: 176  |  PDF Views: 1

Authors

Fateh Singh Bhati
Department of Anaesthesiology and Critical Care, Dr. Sampurnanand Medical College, Jodhpur (Rajasthan), India
Vijay Laxmi Jain
J.L.N. Medical College, Ajmer (Rajasthan), India

Abstract


The present study comparision of lignocaine 5 per cent (hyperbaric) alone and lignocaine 5 per cent (hyperbaric) with neostigmine for spinal anaesthesia was conducted in 100 female patients (ASA-I and II) in age group of 20-50 years of average built (46-64 kgs) undergoing various elective gynaecological surgeries. They were randomly divided into two groups. Group-I consisting of 50 patients were given only lignocaine 5 per cent (hyperharic) 2 cc with 1 cc Dextrose 5 per cent and group-II were given lignocaine 5 per cent (hyperbaric) 2 cc with 100 μg of neostrigmine in 1 cc of 5 per cent Dextrose, after subarchnoid block onset of block, duration of block, side effects, heart rate and mean arterial pressure were observed at different time points. Onset was early in group-II (Lignocaine with Neostigmine) 78.80 sec. than group-I (Lignocaine alone) 97.60 seconds. Duration of analgesia and motor block was prolong in group-II1 (Lignocaine with Neostigmine) (180 min. each) than group-I (Lignocaine alone) (90 min. each). High incidence of nausea and vomiting observed in group-II1 (Lignocaine with Neostigmine) (64% and 48%, respectively) than group-I (Lignocaine alone) (20% and 8%, respectively). Both groups are haemodynamically stable.

Keywords


Lignocaine, Neostigmine.