International Journal of Plant Protection

Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription Access
Open Access Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Restricted Access Subscription Access

Varietal Screening of Mungbean Cultivars for Resistance/Tolerance against Insect Pest under Terai Agro Ecological Zone of West Bengal


Affiliations
1 Department of Agricultural Entomology, Uttar Banga Krishi Viswavidyalaya, Pundibari, Cooch Behar (W.B.), India
2 Department of Agricultural Entomology, Bidhan Chandra Krishi Viswavidyalaya, Mohanpur, Nadia (W.B.), India
     

   Subscribe/Renew Journal


Varietal preference of insect pests on mungbean germplasm was monitored under field conditions at Uttar Banga Krishi Viswavidyalaya, Pundibari, Cooch Behar, West Bengal during the year 2012-13. Five genotypes/lines of mungbean germplasm were screened against insect pest and the germplasms were categorized into resistant and susceptible depending upon severity of pest incidence. The differential responses of mungbean varieties to insect pests were determined and none of the genotype/line was found to be highly resistant to insect pest. During first season, Bireswar (WBM-34-1-1) had less susceptibility to the attack of aphid and thrips gave highest (558.79 kg/ha) grain yield followed by Sukumar (WBM-29) with grain yield of 547.47 k/ha. Same trend was observed in case of aphid and thrips incidence during second season of screening. Comparison of resistance among the five tested genotypes against whitefly showed that the lowest (0.23) number of whiteflies per leaf was observed in Sonali (B-1), lower than those of both Bireswar (WNM-34-1-1) and Sukumar (WBM-29), whereas, the highest (1.33/leaf) was observed in Panna (B-105) during first season. Whereas, in second season lowest (0.65/leaf) whitefly incidence was observed on Sonali (B-1). highest (1.83/ leaf) whitefly incidence was observed in Sukumar (WBM-29) followed by Panna (B-105) and Bireswar with 1.80 and 1.20 numbers per leaf, respectively. In case pod borer incidence, the lowest (0.03) and the highest (1.18) larval population were observed on cultivar Sonali (B-1) and Sukumar (WBM-29), respectively during first season. Whereas, during second season, among five varieties screened, highest (1.23/ plant) pod borer on Samrat (PDM 24-139) variety followed by Bireswar (WBM-34-1-1) and Panna (B-105) by recording pod borer incidence 0.93 and 0.73/ plant, respectively. Lowest (0.22/plant) pod borer incidence observed on Sukumar (WBM- 29) variety. Highest (2.20/plant) predatory coccinellid beetle was observed on Bireswar (WBM-34-1-1) followed by Sonali (B-1) and Samrat (PDM 24-139) with 1.89 and 1.25 numbers per plant, respectively. Lowest (0.84/plant) lady beetle was observed on Panna (B-105) variety during first season. Whereas, during second season highest (4.17/plant) predatory coccinellid beetle was observed on Sukumar (WBM-29) followed by Sonali (B-1) and Samrat (PDM 24-139) with 2.59 and 1.95 numbers per plant, respectively. Lowest (0.88/plant) lady beetle was observed on Panna (B-105) variety. Bireswar (WBM-4-34-1-1) and Sukumar (WBM-29) is fairly resistant to almost all pest of moong. Beside this varieties, remaining were neither fully resistant. Samrat (PDM 24-139) was heavily infested by aphids and thrips, which gave poor (902.31 kg/ha) yield. Among the cultivars, the highest (1108.25 kg/ha) yield potential was obtained in Bireswar (WBM-4-34-1-1) and Sukumar (WBM-29) (1052.75 kg/ha). In contrast variety Panna (B-105) seed gave significantly lower yield (883.79kg/ha) in which Sonali (B-1) (B-1) and Samrat (PDM 24-139) (PDM 24-139) was nearer during second season. It can be concluded that insect pest infestation was strongly influenced by density of trichome on plant surface. Dense (30.0 and 33.50/cm2) trichomes were observed on the leaves of Sukumar (WBM-29) during first and second seasons, respectively. While trichome density was lowest (13.5 and 18.0/cm2) in Samrat (PDM 24-139) had relatively higher aphid incidence during first and second seasons, respectively.

Keywords

Mungbean, Cultivars, Insect Pests, Screening.
Subscription Login to verify subscription
User
Notifications
Font Size


  • Chhabra, K.S. and Kooner, B.S. (1991). Source of resistance in mungbean against insect pests and yellow mosaic virus. Leg. Res., 14 (4): 175-184.

  • Chhabra, K.S. and Kooner, B.S. (1993). Response of some promising mungbean genotypes towards whitefly, jassids and mungbean yellow mosaic virus. J. Insect Sci., 6 (2) : 215-218.

  • Chhabra, K.S. and Kosoner, B.S. (1994). Reaction of some promising mungbean genotypes towards whitefly, jassid and yellow mosaic virus. Pest Manag. Eco. Zool., 2 (1): 11-14.

  • Gibson, R.W. (1971). Glandular hairs providing resistance to aphids in certain wild potato species. Ann. Appl. Biol., 68 : 113–119.

  • Halder, Jaydeep, Sanwal, S.K., Rai, Ajeet Kumar, Rai, A.B., Singh, B. and Singh, B.K. (2015). Role of physico-morphic and biochemical characters of different okra genotypes in relation to population of okra shoot and fruit borer, earias vittella (noctuidae: lepidoptera). Indian J. Agric. Sci., 85 (2): 278–282.

  • Khattak, G.S.S., Saeed, I. and Shah, S.A. (2008). Breeding high yielding and disease resistant mungbean [Vigna radiata (L.)Wilczek ] genotypes. Pak. J. Bot., 40:1411-1417.

  • Khattak, M.K., Ali, S. and Chishti, J.I. ( 2004). Varietal resistance of mungbean (Vigna radiata L.) against whitefly (Bemisia tabaci genn.), jassid (Amrasca devastans dist.) and thrips (Thrips tabaci lind.). Pak. Entomol., 26(1) : 9-12.

  • Lal, S.S. (1985). A review of insect pests of mungbean and their control in India, Tropi. Pest Mgmt., 31: 105-114.

  • Lapointe, S.L. and Tingey, W.M. (1984). Feeding response of the green peach aphid (Homoptera: Aphididae) to potato glandular trichomes. J. Econ. Entomol., 77 : 386–389.

  • Lapointe, S.L. and Tingey, W.M. (1986).Glandular trichomes of Solanum neocardenasii confer resistance to green peach aphid (Homoptera: Aphididae). J. Econ. Entomol., 79 : 1264–1268.

  • Leite, G.L.D. (2000). Fatores que influenciam a intensidade de ataque de moscabranca em tomateiro. 2000. 46 f. Tese (Doutorado em Entomologia) Universidade Federal de Vicosa, Vicosa, MG.

  • Nadeem, S., Hamed, M., Asghar, M.J., Abbas, G. and Saeed, N.A. (2014). Screening of mungbean [Vigna radiate (L.) Wilczek] genotypes against sucking insect pests under natural field conditions. Pakistan J. Zool., 46 (3) : 863-866.

  • Naqvi, S.H., Talpur, M .A., Khan, Rustamani, Mand, M. and Hussain, T. (1995). Relative resistance of mungbean [Vigna radiata (L.) Wilczek], varieties to whitefly and yellow mosaic virus. Proceed. XIV Pak. Cong. Zool., 14 15-17 April, Islamabad, Pakistan, 15 : 247-251.

  • Sahoo, B.K. and Hota, A.K. (1991). Field screening of greengram germplasm against insect pest and disease complex. Madras Agric. J., 78 (1-4) : 84-86.

  • Setiawati, W., Adiarto, B.K. and Gunaeni, N. (2009). Preference and infestation pattern of Bemisia tabaci (Genn) on some tomato varities and its effect on gemini virus infestation. Indonesian. J. Agric. Sci., 2 (1) : 57-64.

  • Sharma, B.N. and Singh, S. (2010). Biophysical and biochemical factors of resistance in okra against shoot and fruit borer, Indian J. Entomol., 72(3): 212–216.

  • Tingey, W.M. and Laubengayer, J.E. (1981). Defense against the green peach aphid and potato leafhopper by glandular trichomes of Solanum berthaultii. J. Econ. Entomol., 74 :721–725.


Abstract Views: 511

PDF Views: 1




  • Varietal Screening of Mungbean Cultivars for Resistance/Tolerance against Insect Pest under Terai Agro Ecological Zone of West Bengal

Abstract Views: 511  |  PDF Views: 1

Authors

Sagar Tamang
Department of Agricultural Entomology, Uttar Banga Krishi Viswavidyalaya, Pundibari, Cooch Behar (W.B.), India
P. Venkatarao
Department of Agricultural Entomology, Uttar Banga Krishi Viswavidyalaya, Pundibari, Cooch Behar (W.B.), India
Gautam Chakraborty
Department of Agricultural Entomology, Bidhan Chandra Krishi Viswavidyalaya, Mohanpur, Nadia (W.B.), India

Abstract


Varietal preference of insect pests on mungbean germplasm was monitored under field conditions at Uttar Banga Krishi Viswavidyalaya, Pundibari, Cooch Behar, West Bengal during the year 2012-13. Five genotypes/lines of mungbean germplasm were screened against insect pest and the germplasms were categorized into resistant and susceptible depending upon severity of pest incidence. The differential responses of mungbean varieties to insect pests were determined and none of the genotype/line was found to be highly resistant to insect pest. During first season, Bireswar (WBM-34-1-1) had less susceptibility to the attack of aphid and thrips gave highest (558.79 kg/ha) grain yield followed by Sukumar (WBM-29) with grain yield of 547.47 k/ha. Same trend was observed in case of aphid and thrips incidence during second season of screening. Comparison of resistance among the five tested genotypes against whitefly showed that the lowest (0.23) number of whiteflies per leaf was observed in Sonali (B-1), lower than those of both Bireswar (WNM-34-1-1) and Sukumar (WBM-29), whereas, the highest (1.33/leaf) was observed in Panna (B-105) during first season. Whereas, in second season lowest (0.65/leaf) whitefly incidence was observed on Sonali (B-1). highest (1.83/ leaf) whitefly incidence was observed in Sukumar (WBM-29) followed by Panna (B-105) and Bireswar with 1.80 and 1.20 numbers per leaf, respectively. In case pod borer incidence, the lowest (0.03) and the highest (1.18) larval population were observed on cultivar Sonali (B-1) and Sukumar (WBM-29), respectively during first season. Whereas, during second season, among five varieties screened, highest (1.23/ plant) pod borer on Samrat (PDM 24-139) variety followed by Bireswar (WBM-34-1-1) and Panna (B-105) by recording pod borer incidence 0.93 and 0.73/ plant, respectively. Lowest (0.22/plant) pod borer incidence observed on Sukumar (WBM- 29) variety. Highest (2.20/plant) predatory coccinellid beetle was observed on Bireswar (WBM-34-1-1) followed by Sonali (B-1) and Samrat (PDM 24-139) with 1.89 and 1.25 numbers per plant, respectively. Lowest (0.84/plant) lady beetle was observed on Panna (B-105) variety during first season. Whereas, during second season highest (4.17/plant) predatory coccinellid beetle was observed on Sukumar (WBM-29) followed by Sonali (B-1) and Samrat (PDM 24-139) with 2.59 and 1.95 numbers per plant, respectively. Lowest (0.88/plant) lady beetle was observed on Panna (B-105) variety. Bireswar (WBM-4-34-1-1) and Sukumar (WBM-29) is fairly resistant to almost all pest of moong. Beside this varieties, remaining were neither fully resistant. Samrat (PDM 24-139) was heavily infested by aphids and thrips, which gave poor (902.31 kg/ha) yield. Among the cultivars, the highest (1108.25 kg/ha) yield potential was obtained in Bireswar (WBM-4-34-1-1) and Sukumar (WBM-29) (1052.75 kg/ha). In contrast variety Panna (B-105) seed gave significantly lower yield (883.79kg/ha) in which Sonali (B-1) (B-1) and Samrat (PDM 24-139) (PDM 24-139) was nearer during second season. It can be concluded that insect pest infestation was strongly influenced by density of trichome on plant surface. Dense (30.0 and 33.50/cm2) trichomes were observed on the leaves of Sukumar (WBM-29) during first and second seasons, respectively. While trichome density was lowest (13.5 and 18.0/cm2) in Samrat (PDM 24-139) had relatively higher aphid incidence during first and second seasons, respectively.

Keywords


Mungbean, Cultivars, Insect Pests, Screening.

References