International Journal of Plant Protection

Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription Access
Open Access Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Restricted Access Subscription Access

Field Evaluation of Different New Fungicides against Rust Disease of Fieldpea (Pisum sativum L.)


Affiliations
1 Krishi Vigyan Kendra (I.G.K.V.), Raipur (Chhattisgarh), India
2 Krishi Vigyan Kendra (I.G.K.V.), Gariyaband, Raipur (Chhattisgarh), India
     

   Subscribe/Renew Journal


The present study was conducted during consecutive Rabi season of year 2012-13 and 2013-14 at farmers field of village Potiya in Gariyaband district of Chhattisgarh plains to test efficacy of some new fungicides in controlling rust diseases of fieldpea. Results revealed that Propiconazole + cyproconazole (330 EC) recorded highest reduction of rust disease incidence before 2nd spray, before 3rd spray and after 3rd spray of fungicides and was found significantly superior as compared to other tested fungicides followed by azoxystrobin 250 SC and difenoconazole 250 SC. Highest per cent disease incidence was recorded with untreated control plot. As far as other observations regarding yield and yield attributing characteristics of fieldpea, Propiconazole + cyproconazole (330 EC) recorded highest plant height, length of pods, breadth of pods, number of pods plant-1, number of seeds pod-1, 1000 seed weight and seed yield of fieldpea followed by azoxystrobin 250 SC and difenoconazole 250 SC. Lowest yield and yield attributes was found with untreated control.

Keywords

Fieldpea, Fungicides, Rust Disease, Yield, Yield Attributes.
Subscription Login to verify subscription
User
Notifications
Font Size


  • Ahmed, A. U., Bakr, M. A., Chowdhury, J. A. and Sarkar, M. A. (2006). Efficacy of six fungicides in controlling rust (Uromyces fabae) disease of lentil (Lens culinaris). Bangladesh J. Plant Pathol., 22(1&2): 39-40.

  • Alam, M. M., Sadat, M. A., Hoque, M. Z. and Rashid, M. H. (2007). Management of powdery mildew and rust diseases of garden pea using fungicides Internat. J. Sustain. Crop Prod., 2(3) : 56-60.

  • Anonymous (2002). Project co-ordinators Report of AICRP on MULLaRP. Indian Institute of Pulses Research, Kanpur (U.P.) INDIA. pp. 20.

  • Ayub, A., Rahman, M. Z.., Ali, S. and Khatun, A. (1996). Fungicidal spray to control leaf rust of lentil. Bangladesh J. Plant Pathol., 12 (1-2): 61-62.

  • Bakr, M. A. and Rahman, M.L. (1998). Current status of research on lentil diseases and future needs. In : Proceedings of the workshop on disease resistance breeding in pulses, TCTTIP, Bangladesh. Project Pub., 11 : 23-31.

  • Boros, L. and Wawer, A. (2009). Garden pea varietal susceptibility to Mycosphaerella pinodes and its effect on yield components of single plants. Veg. Crops Res. Bull., 70:37-47.

  • Borreani, G., Peiretti, P.G. and Tabacco, E. (2007). Effect of harvest time on yield and pre-harvest quality of semi-leafless grain peas (Pisum sativum L.) as whole-crop forage. Field Crops Res., 100 : 1-9.

  • Corre-Hellou, G. and Crozat, Y. (2005). N2 fixation and N supply in organic pea (Pisum sativum L.) cropping systems as affected by weeds and peaweevil (Sitona lineatus L.). European J. Agron., 22:449-458.

  • Cousin, R. (1997). Peas (Pisum sativum L.). Field Crops Res., 53:111-130.

  • Date, R. A. (2000). Inoculated legumes in cropping systems of the tropics. Field Crops Res., 65:123- 136.

  • Dhama, S.K., Tyagi, N.K., Singh, P.B. (2010). Interrelationship and path analysis for seed yield and its component characters under eight environments in pea (Pisum sativum L.). Leg. Res., 33:87-94.

  • Diaz Franco, A. and Perez Garcia, P. (1995).Chemical control of rust and Rabi of chickpea and its influence on yield. Revista Mexicana de Fitopathologia, 13 (2) : 123-125.

  • Gupta, P.C., Kadian, O.P. and Maheshwari, S.K. (1990). Screening of varieties and chemical control againt rust of pea. Indian Phytopathol., 43(1) : 280.

  • Gupta, S.K. and Shyam, K. R. (1998). Control of powdery mildew and rust of pea by fungicide. Indian Phytopathol., 51 (2) : 184- 86.

  • Gupta, S.K. and Shyam, K. R. (2000). Post infection activity of ergosterol biosynthesis inhibiting fungicides against pea rust. J. Mycol. & Plant Pathol., 30(3) : 414-415.

  • Hegab, M. T. and Beshir, M.A. (1994). Effect of nitrogen fertilizer and application of fungicides on chocolate spot, rust, yield and yield components of field bean under calcareous soil. Annl. Agric. Sci., 32 (2): 717-729.

  • Istran, F. (1996). Control fungicides (IS) against fungal diseases of peas. Novenyvedelem, 32(3) : 144 - 46.

  • Jensen, E.S. (1987). Seasonal patterns of growth and nitrogen-fixation in field-grown pea. Plant & Soil 101:29-37.

  • Khaled, A. A. and Moity, S.E.. (1995). Chemical control of some faba bean diseases with fungicides. Egyptian J. Agric. Res., 73 (1): 45-56

  • Khan, I. A. (1994). Introduction in Horticulture. National Book Foundation Islamabad. pp. 43-44.

  • Gul N.I., Jilani M.S., Kashif W. (2006) Effect of split application of nitrogen levels on the quality and quality parameters of pea (Pisum sativum L.). Internat. J. Agric. & Biol., 8:226-230.

  • Lemerle, D., Verbeek, B. and Diffey, S. (2006). Influences of field pea (Pisum sativum) density on grain yield and competitiveness with annual ryegrass (Lolium rigidum) in south-eastern Australia. Australian J. Exp. Agric., 46:1465-1472.

  • Mahanta, I. C., Dhal, A., Mohanty, A. K. and Mohapatra, S. S. (2000). Integrated management of diseases of kidney bean or rajmash (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) in North central plateau zone of Orissa. Orissa J. Hort., 28(2) : 25-28.

  • Marcellos, H. and Moore, K.J. (1995). Influence of foliar-applied fungicides on seed yield of faba bean (Vicia fabae L.) in northern New South Wales. Australian J. Exp. Agric., 35(1): 97-102.

  • Martin, R. J., Wilson, D. R., Butler, R. C., Riddle, M. U., Russell, A. C., Catherwood, D., Beare, M. H., Falloon, R. E., Viljanen-Rollinson, S. L. H., Tregurtha, C. S. and Pyke, N.B. (2008). Improving field pea yields on farm in Canterbury, In: Proceedings of the Agronomy Society of New Zealand, New Zealand, 38 : 41-50.

  • Martin-Sanz, A., Luis Palomo, J., Perez de la Vega, M. and Caminero, C. (2011). Identification of pathovars and races of Pseudomonas syringae, the main causal agent of bacterial disease in pea in North-Central Spain, and the search for disease resistance. European J. Plant Pathol., 129:57-69.

  • McEwen, J. and Yeoman, D.P. (1990). Effects of fungicides and crop density on autumn-sown vicia faba. FABIS Newsletter, 26 (4): 20-22.

  • McPhee, K. (2004). Garden pea. J. New Seeds 6 : 277-288.

  • Pande, S.K. and Srivastava, R.K. (1995). Fungicidal evaluation against rust of lentil. Annl. Plant Protec. Sci., 3 (2): 164.

  • Rahman, M. A., Ahmed, H. and Alam, K. B. (1984).Studies on the efficacy of fungicides and the date of commencing of spray in controlling tikka and rust of ground nut. Bangladesh J. Plant Pathol., 2 (1) : 57-61.

  • Rahman, M. A., Yasmin, L., Bariand, M. A. and Hossain, A. E. (2005). Shabgi fosoler rog-balai O protikar. Plant pathology Division. Horticulture Research Centre.Bangladesh Agric. Res. Institute. Gazipur. pp.20- 23.

  • Singh, B. B. (2008). Project coordinators report 2007-08 All India coordinator research project on MULLARP (ICAR) Annual group meet, Rabiworkshop, 7-9 sept. Maharana Pratap Agriculture University, Udaipur (RAJASTHAN) INDIA pp. 17.

  • Singh, D. and Tripathi, H.S. (2004). Epidemiology and management of field pea rust, J. Mycol. & Plant Pathol., 34 (2) : 675-79.

  • Singh, R.R. (1997). Chemical control of pea rust. Annl. Plant Protec. Sci., 5 (3): 118-119.

  • Singh, R.R. and Singh, M. (1997). Chemical control of pea rust, Annl. Plant Protec. Sci., 5(1) : 118-19.

  • Suhag, L. S. and Rana, R. S. (1984). Efficacy and cost benefit ratio of different doses and number of sprays in controlling pea powdery mildew. Indian Phytopathol., 37: 193-195.

  • Upadhyay, A.L. and Gupta, R. P. (1994). Fungicidal evaluation against powdery mildew and rust of pea (Pisum sativum L.). Annl. Agric. Res., 15 (1): 114-116.

  • Uzun A., Bilgili, U., Sincik M., Filya I., and Acikgoz E. (2005). Yield and quality of forage type pea lines of contrasting leaf types. European J. Agron., 22:85-94.

  • Verma, B. K. (1984). Groundnut rust disease. Proceedings of discussion on group meeting held at ICRISAT Center, Patanchern, India, pp.59.

  • FAOSTAT (2009). http://faostat.fao.org/site/377/default.aspx#ancor


Abstract Views: 325

PDF Views: 0




  • Field Evaluation of Different New Fungicides against Rust Disease of Fieldpea (Pisum sativum L.)

Abstract Views: 325  |  PDF Views: 0

Authors

R. L. Sharma
Krishi Vigyan Kendra (I.G.K.V.), Raipur (Chhattisgarh), India
Tushar Mishra
Krishi Vigyan Kendra (I.G.K.V.), Gariyaband, Raipur (Chhattisgarh), India
Rakesh Bhagat
Krishi Vigyan Kendra (I.G.K.V.), Gariyaband, Raipur (Chhattisgarh), India
Vivek Kumar Swarnkar
Krishi Vigyan Kendra (I.G.K.V.), Gariyaband, Raipur (Chhattisgarh), India

Abstract


The present study was conducted during consecutive Rabi season of year 2012-13 and 2013-14 at farmers field of village Potiya in Gariyaband district of Chhattisgarh plains to test efficacy of some new fungicides in controlling rust diseases of fieldpea. Results revealed that Propiconazole + cyproconazole (330 EC) recorded highest reduction of rust disease incidence before 2nd spray, before 3rd spray and after 3rd spray of fungicides and was found significantly superior as compared to other tested fungicides followed by azoxystrobin 250 SC and difenoconazole 250 SC. Highest per cent disease incidence was recorded with untreated control plot. As far as other observations regarding yield and yield attributing characteristics of fieldpea, Propiconazole + cyproconazole (330 EC) recorded highest plant height, length of pods, breadth of pods, number of pods plant-1, number of seeds pod-1, 1000 seed weight and seed yield of fieldpea followed by azoxystrobin 250 SC and difenoconazole 250 SC. Lowest yield and yield attributes was found with untreated control.

Keywords


Fieldpea, Fungicides, Rust Disease, Yield, Yield Attributes.

References