Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription Access
Open Access Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Restricted Access Subscription Access

Assessment of Residual Toxicity of Seed Protectants (Insecticides) in Stored Pigeonpea Seed


Affiliations
1 Department of Entomology, N.D. University of Agriculture and Technology, Kumarganj, Faizabad (U.P.), India
2 Seed Technology Section, N.D. University of Agriculture and Technology, Kumarganj, Faizabad (U.P.), India
3 Crop Research Station (N.D.U.A. and T.), Masodha, Faizabad (U.P.), India
     

   Subscribe/Renew Journal


Seed protectants have an important role in enhancing the storability of the legume seed by protecting the legume seeds for long time against pulse beetle, Callosobruchus chinensis during storage. But some seed protectants fail to protect seed due to short residual effect . Due to short persistency on seed , the bruchids can survive and breed easily and maintain their population on stored even treated legumes, later on seed damage badly. Considering this point in view the residual toxicity of eight seed protectants (insecticides) were assessed in stored seed of pigeonpea at different storage periods under ambient condition N.D. University of Agriculture and Technology, Kumarganj, Faizabad. Novaluron 10 EC@ 0.05ml/kg seed had longer persistency on stored pigeonpea seed with maximum toxicity against bruchids upto nine month of storage followed by emamectin benzoate (Proclaim 5SG) @2ppm (40.0 mg/kg seed), indoxacarb (Avaunt 14.5 SC) @2ppm (13.8 mg/kg seed), profenofos (Curacron 50 EC) @2ppm (0.004ml/kg seed) and spinosad (Tracer 45 SC) @2ppm (4.4 mg /kg seed).

Keywords

Residual Toxicity, Seed Protectants, Stored Pigeonpea.
Subscription Login to verify subscription
User
Notifications
Font Size


Abstract Views: 183

PDF Views: 0




  • Assessment of Residual Toxicity of Seed Protectants (Insecticides) in Stored Pigeonpea Seed

Abstract Views: 183  |  PDF Views: 0

Authors

R. B. Singh
Department of Entomology, N.D. University of Agriculture and Technology, Kumarganj, Faizabad (U.P.), India
M. K. Yadav
Department of Entomology, N.D. University of Agriculture and Technology, Kumarganj, Faizabad (U.P.), India
R. D. S. Yadav
Seed Technology Section, N.D. University of Agriculture and Technology, Kumarganj, Faizabad (U.P.), India
R. K. Chaudhery
Seed Technology Section, N.D. University of Agriculture and Technology, Kumarganj, Faizabad (U.P.), India
S. P. Giri
Crop Research Station (N.D.U.A. and T.), Masodha, Faizabad (U.P.), India
D. K. Verma
Crop Research Station (N.D.U.A. and T.), Masodha, Faizabad (U.P.), India
Saurabh Verma
Crop Research Station (N.D.U.A. and T.), Masodha, Faizabad (U.P.), India

Abstract


Seed protectants have an important role in enhancing the storability of the legume seed by protecting the legume seeds for long time against pulse beetle, Callosobruchus chinensis during storage. But some seed protectants fail to protect seed due to short residual effect . Due to short persistency on seed , the bruchids can survive and breed easily and maintain their population on stored even treated legumes, later on seed damage badly. Considering this point in view the residual toxicity of eight seed protectants (insecticides) were assessed in stored seed of pigeonpea at different storage periods under ambient condition N.D. University of Agriculture and Technology, Kumarganj, Faizabad. Novaluron 10 EC@ 0.05ml/kg seed had longer persistency on stored pigeonpea seed with maximum toxicity against bruchids upto nine month of storage followed by emamectin benzoate (Proclaim 5SG) @2ppm (40.0 mg/kg seed), indoxacarb (Avaunt 14.5 SC) @2ppm (13.8 mg/kg seed), profenofos (Curacron 50 EC) @2ppm (0.004ml/kg seed) and spinosad (Tracer 45 SC) @2ppm (4.4 mg /kg seed).

Keywords


Residual Toxicity, Seed Protectants, Stored Pigeonpea.