International Journal of Plant Protection

Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription Access
Open Access Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Restricted Access Subscription Access

Evaluation of Fungicides, Botanicals and Bio-Agents against Sheath Blight of Rice Caused by Rhizoctonia solani Kuhn under Irrigated Eco-System


Affiliations
1 Department of Plant Pathology, AICRP on Groundnut, University of Agricultural Sciences, Dharwad (Karnataka), India
2 Department of Plant Pathology, University of Agricultural Sciences, Raichur (Karnataka), India
     

   Subscribe/Renew Journal


The study was conducted to know the field efficacy of different fungicides, botanicals and bio-agents against sheath blight of rice under irrigated eco-system. Among the different treatments, the least per cent disease index (17.00 PDI) was recorded in Hexaconazole (Contaf 5 EC) with the highest grain yield (81.02 q/ha). This was followed by Validamycin 3L (21.60 PDI and grain yield 73.83 q/ha) and Carbendazim 50 WP (24.80 PDI and grain yield 69.21 q/ha). Among the botanicals and bio-agents, the least disease incidence was noticed in Tricure (Azadirachtin @ 0.03%) with 30.50 PDI and grain yield of 61.43 q per ha and P. fluorescens (Pfr-l) with 36.20 PDI with a grain yield of 54.02 q per ha. The C:B ratio was high in Hexaconazole (1:2.5) followed by Propiconazole (1:2.3).

Keywords

Sheath Blight, Rice, Rhizoctonia solani, Hexaconazole, Botanicals, Bio-Agents.
Subscription Login to verify subscription
User
Notifications
Font Size


  • Ahmed,H. V., Shahajahan, A.K.M. and Miah, S.A. (1988). Fungicides to control rice sheath blight. Internat. Rice Res. Newslett., 13 : 37-38.

  • Akter, S., Mian, M.S. and Mia, M.A.T. (2001).Chemical control of sheath blight disease of rice. Bangladesh J. Pl. Pathol., 17(1) : 35-38.

  • Anonymous (1996). Standard evaluation system for rice, International Rice Research Institute, Manila, Philippines, p. 25.

  • Biswas, A. and Roychoudhary, U. K. (2003). Relative efficacy of some botanicals against sheath blight disease of rice. J. Mycopathol. Res., 41 (2) : 163-165.

  • Das, S. R. and Mishra,B. (1990). Field evaluation of fungicides for control of sheath blight of rice. Indian Phytopath., 43 : 94-99.

  • Devi, T. V., Vizhi, R.M., Sakthivel, N. and Gnanamanickam, S. S. (1989). Biological control of sheath blight of rice in India with antagonistic bacteria. Plant & Soil, 119(2) : 325-330.

  • Dubey, S.C. and Toppo,R. (1997). Evaluation of hexaconazole against sheath blight of rice caused by Rhizoctonia solani. Oryza, 34 (3) : 252-255.

  • Gangopadhyay, S. and Chakrabarti, N. K. (1982). Sheath blight of rice. Rev. Pl. Pathol., 61(10) : 451-460.

  • Kannaiyan, S. and Prasad,N. N. (1976).Efficacy of fungicides in the control of sheath blight disease of rice. Madras Agric. J., 63 : 407-408.

  • Kannaiyan, S. and Prasad, N. N. (1984). Effect of foliar spray of certain fungicides on the control of sheath blight disease of rice. Madras Agric. J., 71 : 111-114.

  • Li, H. R., Xiao, J. G. and Yau, S. Q. (1993).Biological control of rice sheath blight by Bacillus cerecus R-2. Acta Phytopathologica-Sinica, 23(2) : 101-105.

  • Meena, R. L., Rathore, R.S. and Mathur, Kusum (2003). Efficacy of biocontrol agents against Rhizoctonia solani f. sp. Sasakii: causing Banded leaf and sheath blight of maize. J. Mycol. Pl. Pathol., 33(2) : 310-312.

  • Miyake, I. (1910). Studies uber die pilze der reispflanzen in Japan. J. College Agric., Tokyo, 2 : 237-276.

  • Paracer, C. S. and Chahal, D. S. (1963). Sheath blight of rice caused by Rhizoctonia solani Kuhn. A new record in India. Curr. Sci., 32 : 328-329

  • Telan, I. F. and Lapis, D. B. (1986). Foliar spray to control sheath blight of rice. Int. Rice Res. Newslett., 11 : 18.

  • Tiwari, R. K.S. (1997). Evaluation of different fungicides against R. solani f. sp. sesakii causing sheath blight of rice. Adv. Pl. Sci., 10(1) : 259-260.

  • Weller, D.M. (1988).Comparative efficacy of local commercial bioagents against sheath blight of rice under glasshouse conditions. Annu. Rev. Phytopathol., 26 : 379-407.

  • Wheeler, B.E.J. (1969). An introduction to plant disease, John Willey and Sons Ltd., London, pp. 301.


Abstract Views: 335

PDF Views: 0




  • Evaluation of Fungicides, Botanicals and Bio-Agents against Sheath Blight of Rice Caused by Rhizoctonia solani Kuhn under Irrigated Eco-System

Abstract Views: 335  |  PDF Views: 0

Authors

P. Nagaraju
Department of Plant Pathology, AICRP on Groundnut, University of Agricultural Sciences, Dharwad (Karnataka), India
M. K. Naik
Department of Plant Pathology, University of Agricultural Sciences, Raichur (Karnataka), India

Abstract


The study was conducted to know the field efficacy of different fungicides, botanicals and bio-agents against sheath blight of rice under irrigated eco-system. Among the different treatments, the least per cent disease index (17.00 PDI) was recorded in Hexaconazole (Contaf 5 EC) with the highest grain yield (81.02 q/ha). This was followed by Validamycin 3L (21.60 PDI and grain yield 73.83 q/ha) and Carbendazim 50 WP (24.80 PDI and grain yield 69.21 q/ha). Among the botanicals and bio-agents, the least disease incidence was noticed in Tricure (Azadirachtin @ 0.03%) with 30.50 PDI and grain yield of 61.43 q per ha and P. fluorescens (Pfr-l) with 36.20 PDI with a grain yield of 54.02 q per ha. The C:B ratio was high in Hexaconazole (1:2.5) followed by Propiconazole (1:2.3).

Keywords


Sheath Blight, Rice, Rhizoctonia solani, Hexaconazole, Botanicals, Bio-Agents.

References