International Journal of Plant Protection

Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription Access
Open Access Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Restricted Access Subscription Access

Evaluation of Sequential Application of Insecticides against Pigeonpea Pod Fly Melanagromyza obtusa


Affiliations
1 Agricultural Research Station, Badnapur, Jalna (M.S.), India
     

   Subscribe/Renew Journal


The present investigation was conducted during Kharif 2016-17 on field of Department of Agricultural Entomology, Agril. Research Station Badnapur. The experiment was planned in Randomized Block Design with cultivar BSMR 736 and gross plot size 7.20 x 4.50 m2 with eight treatments replicated thrice with the object to study the sequential application of insecticides against against pigeonpea pod fly, Melanagromyza obtuse. All the insecticides were found to be significantly superior in recording minimum population of pod fly over untreated control. Among different insecticides, chlorantraniliprole followed by flubendiamide and Dimethoate recorded the least population of pod fly at 3,7 and 14 days after spray and which was statistically at par with the sequential application of insecticides as chlorantraniliprole followed by indoxacarb and acetamiprid in respect of reducing the population , pod damage of pod fly and higher grain yield. These findings indicate that the pigeonpea crop required two sprays of insecticides from pod initiation stage at 20 days interval for the management of pigeonpea pod fly, Melanagromyza obtusa.

Keywords

Insecticides, Melanagromyza obtusa, Pigeonpea, Pod Fly.
Subscription Login to verify subscription
User
Notifications
Font Size


  • Adgkar, R. T., Satpute, U. S., Temude, A. M. and Mahorkar, A. P. (1993). Extent of available incidence and losses due to pod borer complex in promising cultivar of pigeonpea. Pestology. 17 : 45-47.

  • Anonymous (2016). All India Coordinated Research Project on pigeonpea, ICAR, during 2016-17.

  • Bindra, O.S. and Jakhmola, S. S. (1967). Incidence and losses caused by some pod infesting insects in different varieties of pigeonpea, Cajanus cajan (L.) Millsp. Indian J. Agric. Sci. 37 : 177-186.

  • Deshmukh, S.G., Sureja B.V., Jethva, D.M. and Chatar, V.P. (2010). Field efficacy of different insecticsides against Helicoverpa armigera (Hubner) infesting chickpea. Department of Agricultural Entomology, Junagadh Agricultural University, Junagadh-362 001. India. Legumes Res., 33(4): 269-273.

  • Dhaka, S.S., Singh, G., Ali, N., Mittal, V. and Singh, D.V. (2011). Efficacy of novel insecticides against pod borer, Etiella zinckenella (Treitschke) in vegetable pea. Crop Research, 42 (1, 2, 3) : 331-335.

  • Gomez, K.A. and Gomez, A.A. (1984). Statistical procedures for agricultural research. Joh Wiley and Sons, New York., pp. 207-215.

  • Lal, S.S. (1988). Insect pest impulse crops challenges and solutions. In abst. Prof. Nat. symposium on management of biotic and abiotic stress in pulse crops. June 26-28, 1988. At IIRP, Kanpur (India) pp. 4.

  • Naresh, J.S. and Singh, J. (1984). Population dynamics and damage of insect pests in flowering pigeonpea (Cajanus cajan (L.) Millsp.). Indian J. Entomol., 46 (4) : 412-420.

  • Patel, S.A. and Patel, R.K. (2013). Bio-efficacy of newer insecticides against pod borer complex of pigeonpea [Cajanus cajan (L.) Millspaugh]. AGRES - An International e-J., 2 (3) : 398 - 404.

  • Patel, S.A., Patel, B.C., Patel, P.S. and Trivedi, J.B. (2015). Evaluation of newermolecules against pod borer complex of pigeonpea [Cajanus cajan (L.) Millspaugh]. Internat. J. Agric. Sci. , 7 (7) : 587-590.

  • Shanower, T. G., Lal, S. S. and Bhagwat, V. R. (1998). Biology and management of M. obtusa (Malloch) (Diptera: Agromyzidae). Crop Protec., 17: 249-262.

  • Sreekanth, M., Lakshmi, M.S.M. and Koteswara Rao, Y. (2014). Efficacy of novel insecticides to control podfly melanagromyza obtuse affecting pigeonpea (Cajanus cajan L.). J. Plant & Pest Sci., 1(1): 35-38.

  • Wadaskar, R.M., Bhalkare, S.K. and Patil, A.N. (2013). Field efficacy of newer insecticides against pod borer complex of pigeonpea. Pulses Research Unit, Dr. Panjabrao Deshmukh Krishi Vidyapeeth, Akola-444 104, Maharashtra, India. J. Food Leg., 26 (1&2): 62-66.


Abstract Views: 353

PDF Views: 0




  • Evaluation of Sequential Application of Insecticides against Pigeonpea Pod Fly Melanagromyza obtusa

Abstract Views: 353  |  PDF Views: 0

Authors

S. D. Bantewad
Agricultural Research Station, Badnapur, Jalna (M.S.), India
R. A. Chavan
Agricultural Research Station, Badnapur, Jalna (M.S.), India
J. E. Jahagirdar
Agricultural Research Station, Badnapur, Jalna (M.S.), India

Abstract


The present investigation was conducted during Kharif 2016-17 on field of Department of Agricultural Entomology, Agril. Research Station Badnapur. The experiment was planned in Randomized Block Design with cultivar BSMR 736 and gross plot size 7.20 x 4.50 m2 with eight treatments replicated thrice with the object to study the sequential application of insecticides against against pigeonpea pod fly, Melanagromyza obtuse. All the insecticides were found to be significantly superior in recording minimum population of pod fly over untreated control. Among different insecticides, chlorantraniliprole followed by flubendiamide and Dimethoate recorded the least population of pod fly at 3,7 and 14 days after spray and which was statistically at par with the sequential application of insecticides as chlorantraniliprole followed by indoxacarb and acetamiprid in respect of reducing the population , pod damage of pod fly and higher grain yield. These findings indicate that the pigeonpea crop required two sprays of insecticides from pod initiation stage at 20 days interval for the management of pigeonpea pod fly, Melanagromyza obtusa.

Keywords


Insecticides, Melanagromyza obtusa, Pigeonpea, Pod Fly.

References