Open Access
Subscription Access
Open Access
Subscription Access
Evaluation of Newer Insecticides against Leaf Hopper on Bt Cotton
Subscribe/Renew Journal
Evaluation studies were carried out for management of leaf hoppers on Bt cotton during 2012-13 at three different locations. The pooled results revealed that minimum population of leaf hoppers was recorded in the treatment fipronil 5 SC (0.075%) and it was at par with treatment diafenthiuron 50 WP (0.08%) and imidacloprid 30.5 SL (0.005%). Next best treatment was buprofezin 25 SC (0.05%). Significantly highest seed cotton yield of 19.43 q/ha was harvested in application of treatment fipronil 5 SC (0.075%) followed by diafenthiuron 50 WP (0.08%) and imidacloprid 30.5 SL (0.005%) with 18.66 and 18.19 quintal per hectar, respectively. Highest monetary return Rs. 33,409 per ha was also observed in the treatment fipronil 5 SC (0.075%) followed by imidacloprid 30.5 SL (0.005%) (Rs. 30113 per ha) and diafenthiuron 50 WP (0.08%) (Rs. 28340 per ha) whereas in terms of higher incremental cost benefit ratio, imidacloprid 30.5 SL (0.005%) was found superior which recorded 1: 13.3 followed by fipronil 5 SC (0.075%) (1: 8.9).
Keywords
Leaf Hopper, Bt Cotton, Fipronil, Imidacloprid, Diafenthiuron.
Subscription
Login to verify subscription
User
Font Size
Information
- AICCIP (2009). Annual report All India Coordinated Cotton Improvement Project. Central Institute of Cotton Research, Coimbatore.
- Choudhary, R.K., Tomar, S.P.S., Shrivastava, V.K. and Yadav, A.S. (2005). Studies on field evaluation of imidacloprid (Confidor 17.8 SL) against sucking pests of cotton in rainfed condition. J. Cotton Res. Dev., 19(2):241-243.
- Dhawan, A.K., Sidhu, A.S. and Simwat, G.S. (1988). Assessment of avoidable loss in cotton (Gossypium hirsutum and Gossypium arboreum) due to sucking pests and bollworms. Indian. J. Agric. Sci., 58 (4) : 290-99.
- Elbart, A., Becker, B., Hastwig, J. and Erdelen, C. (1991). Imidacloprid a new systemic insecticide. PflSchutzNachr, Bayer, 44 : 113-36.
- Gul, F. (1998). Evaluation of different insecticides and cultivars against jassids in okra. Sarhad J. Agric., 14 (4) : 351-354.
- Kumar, K. and Santharam, G. (1999). Effect of imidacloprid against aphids and leafhoppers on cotton. Annls.Pl.Prot.Sci., 7 (2) : 248-250.
- Mayee, C.D. (2011). Indian Cotton Welcomes WCRC-5. World Cotton Research Conference. The Renaissance Mumbai Hotel and Conservation Center, India: 1-6.
- Mohan, M. and Katiyar, K.N. (2000). Impact of different insecticides used for bollworm control on the population of jassids and whitefly in cotton. Pesticide.Res.J., 12 (1) : 99102.
- Patil, B.V. and Rajanikanth, R. (2004). New class of insecticides, mode of action and their bioefficacy. Paper presented in Int. Symo. Strat. Sust. Cotton Prod. A Global Vision., November 23-25, p. 77-85.
- Patil, S.B., Udikeri, S.S., Matti, P.V., Guruprasad, G.S., Hirekurubar, R.B., Shaila H.M. and Vandal N.B. (2009). Bioefficacy of new molecule fipronil 5% SC against sucking pest complex in Bt cotton. Karnataka J. Agric. Sci., 22 (5): 1029-1031.
- Raghuramn, M., Birah, Ajanta and Gupta, G.P. (2008). Bioefficacy of acetamiprid on sucking pest in cotton. Indian J. Entomol., 70 (4) : 319-325.
- Shashikant, S., Udikeri, Patil, S.B. and Naik, L.K. (2010). Confidor 350 SC: A new imidacloprid formulation for cotton sucking pests. Pestol., 34 :26-29.
- Singh, J., Simwat, G.S., Brar, K.S. and Sohi, A.S. (2002). Efficacy of acetamiprid (N 125) against cotton jassids on American cotton. Insect Environ., 8 (3) : 100-101.
- Sinha, S.R., Singh, Rai and Sharma, R.K. (2007). Management of insect pests of okra through insecticides and intercropping. Ann. Pl. Prot. Sci., 15 (2) : 321-324.
- Siwach, S.S. and Sangwan, R. . (2012). Performance of hybrids produced by different systems for yield and quality in Gossypium hirsutum L. "Silver Jubilee International Symposium on Global Cotton Production Technologies vis-àvis Climate Change" 10-12 October, 2012, CCS HAU, Hisar :157-162.
- Vastrad, A.S. (2003). Neonicotinoids current success and future outlook. Pestology., 27: 60-63.
Abstract Views: 494
PDF Views: 0