Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription Access
Open Access Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Restricted Access Subscription Access

Impact of Front Line Demonstrations (FLDs) on Yield of Pulses in NICRA Villages of Bundelkhand Region of U.P.


Affiliations
1 Krishi Vigyan Kendra, Tatyora, Hardoi (U.P.), India
2 Krishi Vigyan Kendra, Dariyapur, Raebareli (U.P.), India
3 Krishi Vigyan Kendra, Bharari, Jhansi (U.P.), India
     

   Subscribe/Renew Journal


The study was carried out during Kharif, Rabi seasons in NICRA villages of Hamirpur and Jhansi district of Bundelkhand region of Uttar Pradesh during 2014-15. All 255 demonstrations on pigeonpea, black gram, green gram, chick pea, fieldpea and lentil were carried out in area of 53.4 ha by the active participation of farmers with the objective to demonstrate the improved technologies of pulses production potential. The improved technologies consisting use of high yielding variety, seed inoculation with Rhizobium and PSB culture, integrated nutrient and pest management. FLD recorded higher yield as compared to farmer’s local practice. The demonstrated technology recorded higher yield of 1160 kg/ha, 950 kg/ha, 820 kg/ha, 790 kg/ha,700 kg/ha and 350 kg/ha in chick pea, field pea, lentil, black gram, pigeonpea and green gram, respectively than 620, 530, 460, 450 , 420 and 230 kg/ha. Despite of yield increase the technological gap, extension gap and technology index were observed. The results indicated that improved technology gave higher gross return, net return with higher benefit cost ratio as compared to farmer’s practices.

Keywords

Pulses, Yield, Technology Gap, Extension Gap, Technology Index.
Subscription Login to verify subscription
User
Notifications
Font Size


  • Ali, M. and Kumar, S. (2007). Pluses: Good option for rain fed area. The Hindu Survey of Indian Agriculture, Kasturi and Sons Ltd., Kasturi Buildings, Chennai-600 002 , pp. 39-41.
  • Chaturvedi, S.K., Nadarajan, N., Singh, S.K. and Mishra, J.P. (2010). Strategy for enhancing pulses production in Bundelkhand tracts of Uttar Pradesh and Madhya Pradesh. Published in Extension Strategy for Bundelkhand Region, published by Zonal Project Directorate, Kanpur.
  • Dudhade, D., Deshmukh, G.P., Harer, P.N. and Patil, J.V. (2009). Impact of frontline demonstrations of chickpea in Maharashtra. Legume Res., 32 (3): 2206-2208.
  • Kirar, B.S., Nashine, R., Gupta, A.K. and Mukherjee, S.C. (2006). Demonstration: An effective tool for increasing the productivity of urd. Indian Res. J. Extn. Edu., 6(3): 89-97.
  • Kokate, K.D., Singh, A.K. and Singh, Lakhan (2013). Harnessing Pulses Productivity. Published by Division of Agricultural Extension, ICAR, New Delhi.
  • Mokidue, I., Mohanty, A.K. and Sanjay, K. (2011). Corelating growth, yield and adoption of urd bean technologies. Indian J. Extn. Edu., 11(2): 20-24.
  • Mukherjee, N. (2003). Participatory, learning and action. concept, Publishing Company, New Delhi, pp. 63-65.
  • Nadarajan, N. (2013). Prospects and strategies for increasing pulses production in the potential states. In Training Manual ‘Model Training Course on Management of Pest and Diseases in Pulse Crops’ organized at IIPR, Kanpur, pp 1-18.
  • Patel, A.K., Singh, D., Baghel, K.S. and Pandey, A.K. (2014). Enhancing water productivity to improve chickpea production in Bansagar Command Area of Madhya Pradesh. J. Agri. Search., 1(1): 19-21.
  • Poonia, T.C. and Pithia, M.S. (2011). Impact of front line demonstrations of chickpea in Gujarat. Legume Res., 34 (4) : 304-307.
  • Reckling, A.M., Hecker, J.M., Bergkvist, G., Watson, C.A., Zander, P., Schlafke, N., Stoddard, F.L., Eory, V., Topp, C.F.E., Maire, J. and Bachinger, J. (2016). A cropping system assessment framework-evaluating effects of introducing legumes into crop rotations. Eur. J. Agric., 76 (2016) : 186-197.
  • Reddy, A.A. (2010). Regional disparities in food habits and nutritional intake in Andhra Pradesh, India. Regional & Sectoral Economic Studies. Vol. 10-2.
  • Roy, S.K., Burmon, R., Ansari, M.S., Chaudhary, R.G. and Singh, K.K. (2004). Farmer participatory approach in developing need based and location specific technology in pulse based rain fed cropping system in Hamirpur district (U. P.). Farm Sci. J., 13 (1) : 32-35.
  • Samui, S.K., Maitra, S., Roy, D.K., Mondal, A.K. and Saha, D. (2000). Ealuation on front line demonstration on groundnut (Arachis hypogea L.). J. Indian Soc. Coastal Agric. Res., 18 : 180-183.

Abstract Views: 239

PDF Views: 0




  • Impact of Front Line Demonstrations (FLDs) on Yield of Pulses in NICRA Villages of Bundelkhand Region of U.P.

Abstract Views: 239  |  PDF Views: 0

Authors

D. K. Mishra
Krishi Vigyan Kendra, Tatyora, Hardoi (U.P.), India
K. K. Singh
Krishi Vigyan Kendra, Dariyapur, Raebareli (U.P.), India
Nishi Roy
Krishi Vigyan Kendra, Bharari, Jhansi (U.P.), India
Vikas Kumar
Krishi Vigyan Kendra, Bharari, Jhansi (U.P.), India

Abstract


The study was carried out during Kharif, Rabi seasons in NICRA villages of Hamirpur and Jhansi district of Bundelkhand region of Uttar Pradesh during 2014-15. All 255 demonstrations on pigeonpea, black gram, green gram, chick pea, fieldpea and lentil were carried out in area of 53.4 ha by the active participation of farmers with the objective to demonstrate the improved technologies of pulses production potential. The improved technologies consisting use of high yielding variety, seed inoculation with Rhizobium and PSB culture, integrated nutrient and pest management. FLD recorded higher yield as compared to farmer’s local practice. The demonstrated technology recorded higher yield of 1160 kg/ha, 950 kg/ha, 820 kg/ha, 790 kg/ha,700 kg/ha and 350 kg/ha in chick pea, field pea, lentil, black gram, pigeonpea and green gram, respectively than 620, 530, 460, 450 , 420 and 230 kg/ha. Despite of yield increase the technological gap, extension gap and technology index were observed. The results indicated that improved technology gave higher gross return, net return with higher benefit cost ratio as compared to farmer’s practices.

Keywords


Pulses, Yield, Technology Gap, Extension Gap, Technology Index.

References