Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription Access
Open Access Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Restricted Access Subscription Access

An Economic Study of Post-Harvest Losses of Banana in Durg District of Chhattisgarh


Affiliations
1 Department of Agricultural Economics, Sam Higginbottom University of Agriculture, Technology and Sciences, Allahabad (U.P.), India
     

   Subscribe/Renew Journal


An attempt has been made in the present study to estimate the physical post-harvest losses in banana and to identify the causes of losses in Durg district of Chhattisgarh. The explicit evaluation of the impact of post-harvest losses at different stages of marketing on farmers’ net price, marketing costs, margins and efficiency have been presented. The results indicated that there are two major marketing channels viz., wholesaler channel and commission agent channel. The post-harvest losses were as high as 18 kg per quintal in the wholesale channel; comprising 31.67 per cent at the field and assembly level, 33.06 per cent at the wholesale market level and 35.28 per cent at the retail level. The total physical losses in the second marketing channel which was through commission agent were 18.95 kg per quintal with 28.50, 33.25 and 38.26 per cent in the corresponding stages. Small fruits, sun burn, harvesting injury and cracks and cankers at farm level; physiological dryness, physical damage and pressed and crushed fruits, over ripening loss at wholesale market level; physically damaged fruit and over ripened fruit at retailers level were the major causes responsible for post-harvest losses in banana. Further it was found that by separating out marketing loss at each stage of marketing, the producers’ net share and wholesaler and retailer margins have been reduced substantially. It can be inferred that marketing efficiency is inversely proportional to the volume of post-harvest losses.

Keywords

Post-Harvest Losses, Marketing Channel, Banana Growers, Farmers’ Net Price, Marketing Efficiency, Intermediaries’ Margin.
Subscription Login to verify subscription
User
Notifications
Font Size


  • Acharya, S.S. and Agarwal, N.L. (2001). Agricultural marketing in India, Oxford and IBH Publishing Co., New Delhi, India.
  • Anonymous (2006). Postharvest management of fruit and vegetables in the Asia-pacific region. Asian productivity Organization, Japan. ISBN: 92-833-7051-1.
  • Gajanana, T.M., Sreenivasa Murthy, D. and Sudha, M. (2002). Marketing practices and post-harvest loss assessment of banana var. Poovan in Tamil Nadu, Agric. Econ. Res. Rev., 15 (1) : 56-65.
  • Gauraha, A.K. (1997). Economic assessment of post-harvest lossess in vegetable crops, Indian J. Agric. Mktg., 11 (1&2) : 38-39.
  • Hodges, R.J., Buzby, J.C. and Bennett, B. (2011). Postharvest losses and waste in developed and less developed countries: opportunities to improve resource use. J. Agric. Sci., 149 : 37-45.
  • Ilic, Z., Fallik, E. and Dardiæ, M. (2009). Harvest, sorting, packaging and storage of vegetables. Agric. Conspectus Scientificus, 77 (1): 1-4.
  • Kader, A. A. (2002). Postharvest biology and technology: An overview, In: Postharvest technology of horticultural crops. University of California, Division of Agriculture and Natural Resources, Special Public, 3311: 39-47.
  • Kader, A.A. (2005). Increasing food availability by reducing postharvest losses of fresh produce, Proceeding of 5th International Postharvest Symposium, pp. 2169-2175.
  • Kantor, L.S., Lipton, K., Manchester, A. and Oliveira, V. (1997). Estimating and addressing America’s food losses. Food Review, 20: 3-11.
  • Kohls, R.L. and Uhl, J.N. (2002). Marketing of agricultural products, 9th Ed. Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River.
  • Madan, M.S. and Ullasa, B.A. (1991). Post-harvest losses in mango: causes and control measures. Mysore J. Agril. Sci., 25: 458-463.
  • Mitrannavar, D.H. and Yeledalli, R.A. (2014). Estimation of post-harvest losses of majorfruits in Karnataka- A management appraisal. Internat. J. Proc. & Post Harvest Technol., 5 (2): 179-183.
  • Murthy, D.S., Gajanana, T.M., Sudha M. and Dakshinamoorthy (2007). Marketing losses and their impact on marketing margins: A case study of banana in Karnataka. Agric.Econ. Res. Rev., 20 : 47 – 60.
  • Ramesh, M., Palanikumar, K.,Reddy, K. Hemachandra (2013). Comparative evaluation on properties of hybrid glass fiber-sisal/jute reinforced epoxy composites, Procedia Engg., 51:745 – 750.
  • Rao, K.K. and Manohar, K.R. (1995). Losses in packing and transportation of fruits: causes and remedies. Proceedings of the National Seminar on Post-harvest Technology of Fruits, pp. 318-320.
  • Roy, S.K. and Pal, R.K. (1991). Multi locational studies to reduce post-harvest losses during harvesting, handling, packaging, transpiration and marketing of mango in India. Acta Horticulture, 291: 499-503.
  • Salami, P., Ahmadi, H., Keyhani, A. and Sarsaifee, M. (2010). Strawberry postharvest energy losses in Iran. Researcher, 4 : 67-73.
  • Singh, V., Md. Hedayetullah, Zaman, P. and Meher, J. (2014). Postharvest technology of fruits and vegetables: An overview. J. Postharvest Technol., 2 (2): 124-135.
  • Sreenivasa Murthy, D., Gajanana,T.M. and Sudha,M. (2003) Estimation of postharvest loss and marketing efficiency in banana var. yelakki in Karnataka, Bihar J. Agric. Econ, 10 (3) : 221-230.
  • Sreenivasa Murthy, D., Gajanana,T.M. and Sudha, M. (2004). Post-harvest loss estimation and its impact on marketing cost, margin and efficiency: A study in grapes in Karnataka. Indian J. Agric. Econ., 59 (4): 770-786.
  • Sreenivasa Murthy, D., Gajanana, T.M., Sudha, M. and Dakshinamoorthy, V. (2007). Marketing losses and their impact on marketing margins: A case study of banana in Karnataka. Agric. Econ. Res. Rev., 20 : 47-60.
  • Srinivas, R.N., Venkatesha Reddy, T., Ravi, P.C., Achoth, Lalith and Reddy, B.V. Chinnappa (1997). Post-harvest loss assessment in totapuri and alphanso mangoes, J. Food Sci. & Technologies, 34(1) : 70-71.
  • Subrahmanyam, K.V. (1986). Post-harvest losses in horticultural crops: An appraisal. Agricultural Situation India, 41 : 339 - 343.
  • Sudha, M., Ganjana, T.M. and Sreenivasmurthy, V. (2002). Post harvest loss assessment of pinepapple in Kerala, Indian J. Agric.Mktg., 16 (1) : 10-21.
  • Sudheer, K.P. and Indira, V. (2007). Post-harvest technology of horticultural crops, pp. 01-05.

Abstract Views: 283

PDF Views: 0




  • An Economic Study of Post-Harvest Losses of Banana in Durg District of Chhattisgarh

Abstract Views: 283  |  PDF Views: 0

Authors

Archit Kumar Nayak
Department of Agricultural Economics, Sam Higginbottom University of Agriculture, Technology and Sciences, Allahabad (U.P.), India
Nahar Singh
Department of Agricultural Economics, Sam Higginbottom University of Agriculture, Technology and Sciences, Allahabad (U.P.), India
Dinesh Kumar
Department of Agricultural Economics, Sam Higginbottom University of Agriculture, Technology and Sciences, Allahabad (U.P.), India

Abstract


An attempt has been made in the present study to estimate the physical post-harvest losses in banana and to identify the causes of losses in Durg district of Chhattisgarh. The explicit evaluation of the impact of post-harvest losses at different stages of marketing on farmers’ net price, marketing costs, margins and efficiency have been presented. The results indicated that there are two major marketing channels viz., wholesaler channel and commission agent channel. The post-harvest losses were as high as 18 kg per quintal in the wholesale channel; comprising 31.67 per cent at the field and assembly level, 33.06 per cent at the wholesale market level and 35.28 per cent at the retail level. The total physical losses in the second marketing channel which was through commission agent were 18.95 kg per quintal with 28.50, 33.25 and 38.26 per cent in the corresponding stages. Small fruits, sun burn, harvesting injury and cracks and cankers at farm level; physiological dryness, physical damage and pressed and crushed fruits, over ripening loss at wholesale market level; physically damaged fruit and over ripened fruit at retailers level were the major causes responsible for post-harvest losses in banana. Further it was found that by separating out marketing loss at each stage of marketing, the producers’ net share and wholesaler and retailer margins have been reduced substantially. It can be inferred that marketing efficiency is inversely proportional to the volume of post-harvest losses.

Keywords


Post-Harvest Losses, Marketing Channel, Banana Growers, Farmers’ Net Price, Marketing Efficiency, Intermediaries’ Margin.

References