Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription Access
Open Access Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Restricted Access Subscription Access

Cost, Returns and Economic Viability of Cashew Plantations in Tamil Nadu


Affiliations
1 Department of Agricultural Economics, Tamil Nadu Agricultural University, Coimbatore (T.N.), India
2 Department of Agricultural Economics, Tamil Nadu Agricultural University, Coimbatore (T.N.), India
3 Department of Agriculture, Vellore (T.N.), India
4 Department of Agricultural Entomology, Adhiparasakthi Agricultural College, Kalavai (T.N.), India
     

   Subscribe/Renew Journal


Cashew cultivation in India dates back to over 400 years, when the Portuguese who arrived in Kerala in the 16th century introduced it. Initially it was cultivated to arrest soil erosion, afforestation and wasteland development programmes, but later it becomes an important cash crop. The total area under cashew in the world was 35.12 lakh hectares during 2009. In terms of area under cultivation, India ranked first with 8.93 lakh hectares constituting about one - fourth of the area under cashew in the world. To find out the costs and returns of the cashew cultivation among dry cashew cultivated farmers and irrigated cashew cultivated farmers. To estimate the economic viability of dry cashew/irrigated cashew plantations. Cashew was being cultivated as a dry crop in Cuddalore and Ariyalur districts to a larger extent. In Pudukkottai district, cashew was cultivated as both irrigated and dry crop and obviously the yield under dry condition was lesser than that of cashew grown under irrigated conditions. In the next stage, top six villages were purposively selected for the study. In each of the selected villages, 10 cashew growers were randomly selected. However, in Gandharvakkottai block of Pudukkottai district, cashew was cultivated as dry crop, while it was raised as an irrigated crop in Alangudy block of Pudukkottai district. Therefore, 30 dry cashew farms in Gandharvakkottai block and 30 irrigated cashew farms in Alangudy block were selected for the study. Thus, totally 150 dry cashew farms and 30 irrigated cashew farms were selected. Cost and returns like (i) Establishment costs and (ii) Maintenance costs were worked out. Yield and returns like, the yield and prices realized by the growers for the nuts were used to calculate the gross returns, net returns and the returns per hectare of cashew plantation. Economic viability of dry cashew varieties/irrigated cashew varieties the capital budgeting techniques like Net Present Value (NPV), Benefit Cost Ratio (BCR) and Internal Rate of Return (IRR) were employed to assess the economic viability of cashew farms and also for cashew processing units. The gross returns were also more in irrigated farms (Rs. 43650) than that of the dry farms (Rs. 33288). The output-input ratio was 1.85, 2.03 for dry cashew farms, irrigated cashew farms, respectively. These would indicate the high profitability of cashew production was found only in irrigated farms and this was achieved by gap filling and following modern farming techniques. The Net Present Value was higher for irrigated farms (Rs. 80,027) than that of the dry farms (Rs. 57,911). In case of Benefit Cost Ratio, irrigated farms had higher ratio of 2.28 than that of the dry farms 2.03. Similarly, the Internal Rate of Return was also more for irrigated farms (42 %) when compared to that of the dry farms (37 %). This would highlight that the cashew plantation would be a financially worthwhile venture in the study area and there is a vast potential for taking up the cultivation of high yielding varieties of cashew plantation, especially in the irrigated conditions of Pudukkottai district of Tamil Nadu.

Keywords

Cashew Nut, Cost and Returns, Establishment Costs, Maintenance Costs, Economic Viability, Net Present Value (NPV), Benefit Cost Ratio (BCR), Internal Rate of Return (IRR).
Subscription Login to verify subscription
User
Notifications
Font Size


  • Balasubramanian, D. (2001). Cashew processing Industries in Kerala, (Quilon and Calicut). The Cashew, 15(2): 28-35.
  • Balasubramanian, D. (2001). Cashew Processing Industries in India, (Overall analysis). The Cashew, 15(2): 14-20.
  • Balasubramanian, D. (2002). Performance of Cashew nut Processing in Mozambique. Agric. Mechanization Asia, Africa & Latin America, 33(2): 67-70.
  • Horticulture at a Glance (2008-09). Joint Director of Agriculture office, Pudukkottai district.
  • Indian Cashew Statistics (2010). Cashew nut Export Promotion Council, Cochin.
  • Season and Crop Report of Tamil Nadu (2008-09) (Fasli1418), Department of Economics and Statistics, Chennai, T.N. (INDIA).
  • Selvarajan, M. and Dharmalingam, V. (1998). Production technologies for cashew for different agro climatic tracts of Tamil Nadu. The Cashew, 12(3): 93-102.
  • Selvaraj, K.N. and Sundaravaradarajan, K.R. (1999). Cashew cultivation- problems, prospects and opportunities. Abstract of 19th Annual conference of Association of Economists of Tamil Nadu and Pondicherry, Department of Economics, pp. 20-21.
  • Sundaravaradarajan, K.R. and Jahanmohan, K.R. (2002). Marketing cost, margin, price spread and marketing efficiency of cashew in Tamil Nadu. Agric. Situ. India, 59(1) : 9-16.

Abstract Views: 349

PDF Views: 0




  • Cost, Returns and Economic Viability of Cashew Plantations in Tamil Nadu

Abstract Views: 349  |  PDF Views: 0

Authors

R. Loganathan
Department of Agricultural Economics, Tamil Nadu Agricultural University, Coimbatore (T.N.), India
K. Mani
Department of Agricultural Economics, Tamil Nadu Agricultural University, Coimbatore (T.N.), India
G. Mariappan
Department of Agriculture, Vellore (T.N.), India
K. Indrakumar
Department of Agricultural Entomology, Adhiparasakthi Agricultural College, Kalavai (T.N.), India

Abstract


Cashew cultivation in India dates back to over 400 years, when the Portuguese who arrived in Kerala in the 16th century introduced it. Initially it was cultivated to arrest soil erosion, afforestation and wasteland development programmes, but later it becomes an important cash crop. The total area under cashew in the world was 35.12 lakh hectares during 2009. In terms of area under cultivation, India ranked first with 8.93 lakh hectares constituting about one - fourth of the area under cashew in the world. To find out the costs and returns of the cashew cultivation among dry cashew cultivated farmers and irrigated cashew cultivated farmers. To estimate the economic viability of dry cashew/irrigated cashew plantations. Cashew was being cultivated as a dry crop in Cuddalore and Ariyalur districts to a larger extent. In Pudukkottai district, cashew was cultivated as both irrigated and dry crop and obviously the yield under dry condition was lesser than that of cashew grown under irrigated conditions. In the next stage, top six villages were purposively selected for the study. In each of the selected villages, 10 cashew growers were randomly selected. However, in Gandharvakkottai block of Pudukkottai district, cashew was cultivated as dry crop, while it was raised as an irrigated crop in Alangudy block of Pudukkottai district. Therefore, 30 dry cashew farms in Gandharvakkottai block and 30 irrigated cashew farms in Alangudy block were selected for the study. Thus, totally 150 dry cashew farms and 30 irrigated cashew farms were selected. Cost and returns like (i) Establishment costs and (ii) Maintenance costs were worked out. Yield and returns like, the yield and prices realized by the growers for the nuts were used to calculate the gross returns, net returns and the returns per hectare of cashew plantation. Economic viability of dry cashew varieties/irrigated cashew varieties the capital budgeting techniques like Net Present Value (NPV), Benefit Cost Ratio (BCR) and Internal Rate of Return (IRR) were employed to assess the economic viability of cashew farms and also for cashew processing units. The gross returns were also more in irrigated farms (Rs. 43650) than that of the dry farms (Rs. 33288). The output-input ratio was 1.85, 2.03 for dry cashew farms, irrigated cashew farms, respectively. These would indicate the high profitability of cashew production was found only in irrigated farms and this was achieved by gap filling and following modern farming techniques. The Net Present Value was higher for irrigated farms (Rs. 80,027) than that of the dry farms (Rs. 57,911). In case of Benefit Cost Ratio, irrigated farms had higher ratio of 2.28 than that of the dry farms 2.03. Similarly, the Internal Rate of Return was also more for irrigated farms (42 %) when compared to that of the dry farms (37 %). This would highlight that the cashew plantation would be a financially worthwhile venture in the study area and there is a vast potential for taking up the cultivation of high yielding varieties of cashew plantation, especially in the irrigated conditions of Pudukkottai district of Tamil Nadu.

Keywords


Cashew Nut, Cost and Returns, Establishment Costs, Maintenance Costs, Economic Viability, Net Present Value (NPV), Benefit Cost Ratio (BCR), Internal Rate of Return (IRR).

References