Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription Access
Open Access Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Restricted Access Subscription Access

Global Electric Circuit Parameters and their Variability Observed over Maitri, Antarctica


Affiliations
1 Equatorial Geophysical Research Laboratory, Indian Institute of Geomagnetism, Tirunelveli - 627 011, India
2 Indian Institute of Geomagnetism, New Panvel, Navi Mumbai - 410 218, India
     

   Subscribe/Renew Journal


The global component of fairweather electricity is subject to special attention to watch the solar-terrestrial effects and secular changes in climate. It is generally considered that the diurnal variation of atmospheric electricity parameters, if they are not following the Carnegie pattern, are not representative of the global thunderstorm activity. Some of the results obtained from Maitri (70°45'54"S, 11°44'03"), are discussed here in context with global thunderstorm activity and space weather influences. The diurnal pattern of the Potential Gradient and current density strongly deviate from the Carnegie curve. We have showed that this deviation is not due to the local electrical influence but due to the global thunderstorm activity. During fairweather condition the parameters are representing the global thunderstorm activity and to some extent they respond to the upper atmospheric electro dynamic phenomenon. The mean value of the potential gradient (77.7 V/m) and current density (2.13 pA/m2) well below the expected global mean but close to the value reported from the same location and season in the past years. The mean conductivity, 3.34 × 10-14 mhom-1, is slightly at higher side and they exhibit a different diurnal trend comparing to the past measurements at this location.

Keywords

Conductivity, Conduction Current, Potential Gradient, Global Lightning Flash Numbers, Geomagnetic Substorm.
Subscription Login to verify subscription
User
Notifications
Font Size

  • ALDERMAN, E.J. and WILLIAMS, E.R. (1996) Seasonal variation of the global electric circuit. Jour. Geophys Res., v.101, D23, pp.29679-29688.
  • ANIL KUMAR C.P., PANNEERSELVAM, C., NAIR, K.U., JOHNSON JEYAKUMAR, H., SELVARAJ, C., GURUBARAN, S. and VENUGOPAL, C. (2009) Apposite of atmospheric electric parameters with the energy coupling function (μ) during geomagnetic storms at high latitude, Atmospheric Res., v.91, pp.201-205.
  • APLIN, K.L. (2000) Instrumentation for atmospheric ion measurements, PhD Thesis, Department of Meteorology, The University of Reading, UK.
  • AUMENTO, F. (2001) Radon tides on an active volcanic Island. Presented at 6th International Rare Gas Conference, Cuernavaca, Mexico.
  • BELOVA, E., KIRKWOOD, S. and TAMMET, H. (2001) The effect of magnetic substorms on near-ground atmospheric current. Ann. Geophys., v.18(12).
  • BURNS, G.B., FRANK-KAMENETSKY, A.V., TROSHICHEV, O.A., BERING, E.A. and PAPITASHVILI, V.O. (1998) The geoelectric field: A link between the troposphere and solar variability. Annals of Glaciology, v.27, pp.651-654.
  • CHALMERS, J.A. (1967) Atmospheric Electricity, 2nd ed., Pergamon Press, Oxford.
  • CHUBB, J.N. (1990) Two New Designs of "Field Mill" Type Fieldmeters not Requiring Earthing of Rotating Chopper. IEEE Trans. on Industry Applications, v.26, no.6, pp.1178-1181.
  • COBB, W.E. and WELLS, H.J. (1970) The electrical conductivity of oceanicair and its correlation to global atmospheric pollution. Jour. Atmos. Sci., v.27, pp.814-819.
  • CORNEY, R.C., BURNS, G. B., MICHAEL, K., FRANK-KAMENETSKY, A.V., TROSHICHEV, E.A. BERING, O.A., PAPITASHVILI V.O., BREED, A.M. and DULDIG, M.L. (2003) The influence of polar-cap convection on the geoelectric field at Vostok, Antarctica. Jour. Atmos. Solar-Terrestrial Physics, v.65, pp.345-354.
  • DESHPANDE, C.G. and KAMRA, A.K. (2001) Diurnal variations of atmospheric electric field and conductivity at Maitri, Antarctica. Jour. Geophys. Res., v.106(D13), pp.14, 207-14, 218.
  • DHANORKAR, S. and KAMRA, A.K. (1997) Calculation of Electrical Conductivity from ion Aerosol balance equation. Jour. Geophys. Res., v.102, D25, pp.30147-30159.
  • DOLEZALEK, H. (1972) Discussion of the fundamental problem of atmospheric electricity, Pure and Applied Geophys., v.100, pp.8-43.
  • FREIER, G.D. (1961) Auroral effects on the Earths Electric field. Jour. Geophy. Res., v.66, pp.2695-2702.
  • FREIER, C.D. (1979) Time dependent fields and a new mode of charge generation in severe thunderstorms. Jour. Atmos. Sci., v.36, pp.1967-1975.
  • HARRISON, R.G. (2004) The global atmospheric electric circuit and climate. Survey in Geophys., v.25, pp.441-484.
  • HOLZWORTH, R.H. and MOZER, D.F.S. (1979) Direct evidence of solar flare modification of stratospheric electric fields. Jour. Geophys. Res., v.84, pp.363-367.
  • HOLZWORTH, R.H. (1981) High latitude stratospheric electrical measurements in fair and foul weather under various solar conditions. Jour. Atmos. Terr. Phys., v.43, pp.1115-1125.
  • HOPPEL, W.A. and GATHMAN, S.G. (1971) Determination of eddy diffusion coefficients from atmospheric electric measurements. Jour. Geophys. Res., v.76, pp.1467-1971.
  • HOPPEL,W.A., Anderson, R.V. and Willett, J.D.J.C. (1986) Atmospheric Electricity in the Planatary Boundary Layer, in Earths Electrical Environment, National Academy Press, Washington D.C.
  • ISRAELSSON, S. (1991) Report series in aerosol science no.19, Dept. of Physics, Helsinki, Finland.
  • JACKMAN, C.H., CERNINGLIA, M.C., NIELSEN, J.E., ALLEN, D.J., ZAZODNY, J.M., MC PETERS, R. D., DOUGLASS, A.R., ROSEFIELD, J.E. and ROOD, B. (1995) Two dimensional and three dimensional model simulations, Measurements and interpretations of the influence of the October 1989 Solar proton events on the middle atmosphere. Jour. Geophys. Res., v.100, pp.11641-660.
  • KAMRA, A.K., DESHPANDE, C.G. and GOPALAKRISHNAN, V. (1994) Challenge to the assumption of the unitary diurnal variation of the atmospheric electric field based on observations in the Indian Ocean, Bay of Bengal, and Arabian Sea. Jour. Geophys. Res., v.99(D10), pp. 21043-21050.
  • KARTALEV, M.D., RYCROFT, M.J, FUELLEKRUG, M., PAPITASHVILI, V.G. and KEREMIDARSKA, V.I. (2006) A possible explanation for the dominant effect of South American thunderstorms in the Carnegie Curve. Jour. Atmos. Solar Terrestrial Physics, v.68, pp.457-468.
  • KASEMIR, H.W. and RUHNKE, L.H. (1959) Antenna problems of measurement of the air-Earth current. In: L.G. Smith (Ed.), Recent advances in Atmospheric Electricity. Pergamon, New York, pp.137-147.
  • LOBODIN, T.V. and PARAMANOV, N.A. (1972) Variation of Electric field during aurorae. Pure Appld. Geophys., v.100, pp.167-173.
  • MARKSON, R. (1978) Solar modulation of atmospheric electrification and possible implications for the Sun-weather relationship. Nature, v.273, pp.103-109.
  • MACGORMAN, D.R. and RUST, W.D. (1998) The Electrical Nature of Storms. Oxford University Press, New York, 403p.
  • MOHNEN, V.A. (1974) Formation, nature and mobility of ions of atmospheric importance. Proc. V International Conference on Atmospheric Electricity, Garmish-Partenkirchen, Germany.
  • MOZER, F.S. and SERLIN, R. (1969) Magnetospheric electric field measurements with balloons. Jour. Geophys. Res., v.74, pp.4739-4755.
  • MOZER, F.S. (1971) Balloon measurement of vertical and horizontal atmospheric electric fields. Pure Appld. Geophys., v.84.
  • MUHLEISEN, R. (1977) The global circuit and its parameters. In: Dolezalek, H., Reiter, R. (Eds.), Electrical Process in Atmospheres. Steinkopff, Darmstadt, p.467.
  • PANNEERSELVAM, C., NAIR, K.U. JEEVA, K., SELVARAJ, C., GURUBARAN, S. and RAJARAM, R. (2003) A comparative study of atmospheric Maxwell current and electric field from a low latitude station, Tirunelveli. Earth Planets Space, v.55, pp.697-703.
  • RAJARAM, GIRIJA, ARUN, T. and AJAY DHAR (2002) Diagnostics of magnetosphere-ionosphere coupling over Indian Antarctic station Maitri, from magnetometer and riometer observations during the optical auroral event of 4-5 March 1999. Adv. Space Res., v.30, no.10, pp.2195-2201.
  • RAJESH KALRA, AJAY DHAR, UNNIKRISHNAN. K, JEEVA. K, DAGA. D.M. and GIRIJA RAJARAM (1995) Changes in the Auroral Electrojet Currents Inferred from Geomagnetic Field Variations at Maitri and Northern Conjugate Stations. Eleventh Indian Expedition to Antarctica, Scientific Report, 1995 Department of Ocean Development, Technical Publication No.9, pp. 87-101.
  • REDDELL, B.D., BENBROOK J.R., BERING E.A., CLEARY E.N. and FEW, A.A. (2004) Seasonal variations of atmospheric electricity measured at Amundsen-Scott South Pole station. Jour. Geophys. Res., v.109, pp.A09308.
  • ROSTOKER, G. (1999) The evolving concept of a magnetospheric substorm. Jour. Atmos. Solar Terestrial Physics, v.61, pp.85-100.
  • RUHNKE, L.H. (1969) Area averaging of atmospheric current. Jour. Geomagn., Geoelectr., v.21, pp.453-462.
  • RUHNKE, L.H. and MICHNOWSKI, S. (Eds.) (1991) Proceedings of the International Workshop on Global Atmospheric Electricity Measurements, Madralin, Poland, September 10-16, 1989. Publ. Institute of Geophysics, Polish Academy of Sciences D-35 (238).
  • RYCROFT, M.J., ISRAELSSON, S. and PRICE, C. (2000) The global atmospheric electric circuit, solar activity and climate change. Jour. Atmos. Solar Terrestrial Physics, v.62, pp.1563-1576.
  • TAKAJI, M. and IWATA, A. (1980) A seasonal effect in diurnal variation of the atmospheric field on the Pacific coast of Japan. Pure Appld. Geophys., v.118(2).
  • TAMMET, H., ISRAELSSON, S., KNUDSEN, K. and TUOMI, T.J. (1996) Effective area of a horizontal long-wire antenna collecting the atmospheric electric vertical current. Jour. Geophys. Res., v.101, pp.29671-29678.
  • TINSLEY, B.A., WEIPING, L., ROHRBAUGH, R.P. and KIRKLAND, M.W. (1998) South Pole electric field responses to over-head ionospheric convection. Jour. Geophys. Res., v.103 (D20), pp.26,137-26,146.
  • TINSLEY, B.A. (2000) Influence of solar wind on the global electric circuit and inferred effects on the cloud microphysics, temperature and dynamics in troposphere. Space Sci. Rev., v.94, pp.231-258.
  • TINSLEY, B.A. (1996) Correlations of atmospheric dynamics with solar-wind-induced Changes of air-Earth current density into cloud tops. Jour. Geophys. Res, v.101, pp.701-714.
  • TINSLEY, B.A and HEELIS, R.A. (1993) Correlations of atmospheric dynamics with solar Activity. Evidences for a connection via the solar wind atmospheric Electricity and microphysics. Jour. Geophys. Res., v.98, pp.275-384.
  • TRIPATHY, S.N. and HARRISON, R.G. (2002) Enhancement of contact nucleation by scavenging of charged aerosol particles. Atmos. Res., v.62, pp.57-70.
  • TUOMI, T.J. (1981) Atmospheric electrode effect, approximate theory and winter time observations'. Pure Appl. Geophys., v.119, pp.31-45.
  • TUOMI, T. J. (1982) The atmospheric electrode effect over snow. Jour. Atmos. Terr. Phys., v.44, pp.737-745.
  • WILLIAMS, E.R. (1994) Global Circuit response to seasonal variations in Global surface air-temperature. Month Weather Rev., v.122, pp.1917-1929.
  • WILLIAMS, E.R. and SATORI, G. (2004) Lightning, thermodynamic and hydrological comparison of the two tropical continental chimneys. JASTP, v.66.
  • WILSON, C.T.R. (1920) Investigation on lightning discharges and on the electric field of thunderstorms. Philos. Trans. Royal Soc. London, v.A221, pp.73-115.

Abstract Views: 195

PDF Views: 0




  • Global Electric Circuit Parameters and their Variability Observed over Maitri, Antarctica

Abstract Views: 195  |  PDF Views: 0

Authors

K. Jeeva
Equatorial Geophysical Research Laboratory, Indian Institute of Geomagnetism, Tirunelveli - 627 011, India
C. Panneerselvam
Equatorial Geophysical Research Laboratory, Indian Institute of Geomagnetism, Tirunelveli - 627 011, India
K. U. Nair
Equatorial Geophysical Research Laboratory, Indian Institute of Geomagnetism, Tirunelveli - 627 011, India
C. Selvaraj
Equatorial Geophysical Research Laboratory, Indian Institute of Geomagnetism, Tirunelveli - 627 011, India
Ajay Dhar
Indian Institute of Geomagnetism, New Panvel, Navi Mumbai - 410 218, India
B. M. Pathan
Indian Institute of Geomagnetism, New Panvel, Navi Mumbai - 410 218, India
S. Gurubaran
Equatorial Geophysical Research Laboratory, Indian Institute of Geomagnetism, Tirunelveli - 627 011, India

Abstract


The global component of fairweather electricity is subject to special attention to watch the solar-terrestrial effects and secular changes in climate. It is generally considered that the diurnal variation of atmospheric electricity parameters, if they are not following the Carnegie pattern, are not representative of the global thunderstorm activity. Some of the results obtained from Maitri (70°45'54"S, 11°44'03"), are discussed here in context with global thunderstorm activity and space weather influences. The diurnal pattern of the Potential Gradient and current density strongly deviate from the Carnegie curve. We have showed that this deviation is not due to the local electrical influence but due to the global thunderstorm activity. During fairweather condition the parameters are representing the global thunderstorm activity and to some extent they respond to the upper atmospheric electro dynamic phenomenon. The mean value of the potential gradient (77.7 V/m) and current density (2.13 pA/m2) well below the expected global mean but close to the value reported from the same location and season in the past years. The mean conductivity, 3.34 × 10-14 mhom-1, is slightly at higher side and they exhibit a different diurnal trend comparing to the past measurements at this location.

Keywords


Conductivity, Conduction Current, Potential Gradient, Global Lightning Flash Numbers, Geomagnetic Substorm.

References