Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription Access
Open Access Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Restricted Access Subscription Access

Recent Changes in Measurement of India’s GDP:Overall Issues and Some Focus on Agriculture


Affiliations
1 IGIDR, Mumbai, India
     

   Subscribe/Renew Journal


This paper discusses (a) changes in measurement in industry and services (b) changes made in agriculture sector and (c) major issues on the measurement of GDP in new series. There are long term or legacy issues in agriculture, industry and services. The paper examines 10 major issues on measurement of GDP in the new series. These are: (1) MCA 21 data problems; (2) separation of Quasi corporations from household sector; (3) effective labour input method; (4) high growth rate of GDP vs. ground realities; (5) GDP at market prices vs. GVA at basic prices vs. GDP at factor prices; (6) GDP by production and expenditure methods; (7) single vs. double deflation; (8) price deflators WPI vs. CPI; (9) nominal growth vs. real growth; (10) reference point for growth: advance estimates, provisional estimates, first revised estimates and second revised estimates. In our view, although there are some gaps in the measurement ofGDPthe new series and the methodology adopted are based on ‘best advice’ from experts available in the country. The issues discussed in the paper will be useful for next base revision of National Accounts Statistics.
User
Subscription Login to verify subscription
Notifications
Font Size

  • Anant, T C A, 2015; "Don’t Compare New GDP Data Series with Old", The Economic Times, 14 April.
  • Anant, T C A, 2016a; "Discrepancies are inherent part of expenditure side of GDP as of now", Business Standard, 2 June.
  • Anant, T C A, 2016b; "IIP has limitations as a representative of aggregate growth in manufacturing", The Hindu, 20 June.
  • Anant, T C A, 2016c; "CSO swears by GDP data, rebuts criticism", Business Line, July 12.
  • Anant, T C A, 2016d; "Don’t question my data, get your analysis right says India’s Chief Statistician", The Hindu, January 22.
  • Barman, R. B., 2016; "Rethinking Economics, Statistical System and Welfare: A Critique with India as a Case", Economic and Political Weekly, Vol. 51, No. 28, 9 July.
  • Bhandari, P., 2016; "The Double Deflation Issue", presentation at the conference on ‘GDP measurement issues’, August 5, organised by IGIDR, Mumbai.
  • CSO, 2012; "National Accounts Statistics: Sources and Methods, 2012", Central Statistical Office, New Delhi
  • CSO, 2014; "Report of the Sub-committee on Agriculture and Allied Sectors", Chaired by S. Mahendra Dev, Central Statistical Office, New Delhi.
  • CSO, 2015a; "New Series of Estimates of National Income, Consumption Expenditure, Saving and Capital Formation for the years 2011-12 to 2013-14", New Delhi, Central Statistical Office, Press Note, January 30.
  • CSO, 2015b; "Changes in Methodology and Data Sources in the New Series of National Accounts: Base Year 2011-12", Central Statistical Office, New Delhi, 26 June.
  • CSO, 2015c; "Understanding the New Series of National Accounts", Government of India, Central Statistical Office, New Delhi.
  • CSO, 2017; "Revision of Base Year of All India Index of Production from 2004-05 to 2011-12", Press release, 12 May, Central Statistics Office, New Delhi.
  • Dholakia, H.R. 2015; "Double Deflation Method and Growth of Manufacturing A comment", Economic and Political Weekly, Vol. 50, No. 41, 10 October.
  • Dholakia, H.R. and M.B. Pandya, 2017; "Critique of Recent Revisions with Base Year Change for Estimation of State Income in India" paper presented at the Symposium on "Changes in Methodology of Estimates of India’s GDP", January 21, 2017, organised by the Indian School of Political Economy, Pune
  • EPW Research Foundation, 2015; "New Series of National Accounts:AReview", Economic and Political Weekly, Vol. 50, No. 7, 14 February.
  • Felman, Josh, 2016; "The Deflator Issue", presentation at the conference on ‘GDP measurement issues’, August 5, organised by IGIDR, Mumbai.
  • GOI, 2001; "Report of the National Statistical Commission", Chaired by Dr. C. Rangarajan, Government of India, New Delhi.
  • GOI, 2014; "Report of the Expert Group to Review the Methodology for Measurement of Poverty", Chaired by Dr. C. Rangarajan, Government of India, New Delhi.
  • Goldar, B., 2016; "Measuring India’s GDP growth; by R. Nagaraj and T.N. Srinivasan - Some Comments on the paper", India Policy Forum, NCAER, July 12.
  • Manna, G.C., 2017; "An Investigation into Some Contentious Issues of GDP Estimation", paper presented at the Symposium on "Changes in Methodology of Estimates of India’s GDP, January 21, organised by the Indian School of Political Economy, Pune.
  • Nagaraj, R., 2016; "Unorganised Sector in GAP Series: Why has it Shrunk?", Economic and Political Weekly, Vol. 51, No. 14, April 2.
  • Nagaraj, R. and T.N. Srinivasan. 2016; "Measuring India’s GDP Growth: Unpacking the Analytics & Data Issues behind a Controversy that Refuses to Go Away", India Policy Forum 2016, National Council of Applied Economic Research (NCAER), New Delhi, 12-13 July.
  • Rajakumar, J. Dennis, 2015; "Private CorporateSector inNew NAS Series Need for a Fresh Look", Economic and Political Weekly, Vol. 50, No. 29, 18 July.
  • Rajakumar, J. Dennis, 2016; "Estimates of High GDP growth in 2015-16 Not Entirely Convincing", Economic and Political Weekly, Vol. 51, No. 26&27, 25 June.
  • Rajakumar, J Dennis and S.L. Shetty, 2015; "New National Accounts Series: An Exploratory Exposition", PPT presented at IGIDR, April 15, 2015, IGIDR.
  • Rajakumar, J Dennis and S.L. Shetty, 2015a; "Gross Value Added Why Not the Double Deflation Method for Estimation?", Economic and Political Weekly, Vol. 50, No. 33, 15 August.
  • Rajakumar, J Dennis and S.L. Shetty, 2016; "Some Puzzling Features of India’s RecentGDPNumbers", Economic and Political Weekly, Vol. 51, No. 2, 9 January.
  • Rajakumar, J Dennis and S.L. Shetty, 2016a; "Continuous Revisions Cast Doubts on GDP Advance Estimates", Economic and Political Weekly, Vol. 51, No. 10, 5 March.
  • Rajakumar, J Dennis and S.L. Shetty, 2017; "New National Accounts Series: An Explanation and Key Issues in the Debate", in Dev, S. Mahendra (ed., 2017), India Development Report, Oxford University Press, forthcoming in 2017.
  • Rangarajan, C. and S. Mahendra Dev, 2016; "Counting the Poor: Where do we Stand", Academic Foundation, New Delhi.
  • S.L. Shetty and Rajakumar J. Dennis, 2017; "New National Accounts Series: An Explanation and Key Issues in the Debate", paper presented at the Symposium on "Changes in Methodology of Estimates of India’s GDP", January 21, 2017, organised by the Indian School of Political Economy, Pune.
  • Sapre, A. and P. Sinha, 2016; "Some issues in estimation of GVA in the manufacturing sector" presentation at the conference on ‘GDP measurement issues’, August 5, 2016, organised by IGIDR, Mumbai.
  • Sengupta, Rajeswari, 2016; "IGIDR Conference on GDP Measurement Issues: A Summary of Discussions", IGIDR, Mumbai, August 5, 2016
  • Sengupta, Rajeswari, 2016a; "Sources of GDP Growth", presentation at the conference on ‘GDP measurement issues’, August 5, 2016, organised by IGIDR, Mumbai.
  • Shetty, S.L. 2015; "Factor Cost Basis of GDP is Fundamental for Measuring Real Growth and Not GDP at Market Prices",A paper presented at the 34th Annual Conference of the Indian Association for Research in National Income and Wealth held during November 20-21, 2015 at IGIDR, Mumbai.
  • Srinivasan, 2013; "Some Reflections on the State and NearTerm Prospects of the Indian Economy", valedictory address at the Golden Jubilee conference of the Indian Econometric Society, December 2013, IGIDR, Mumbai.

Abstract Views: 308

PDF Views: 4




  • Recent Changes in Measurement of India’s GDP:Overall Issues and Some Focus on Agriculture

Abstract Views: 308  |  PDF Views: 4

Authors

S. Mahendra Dev
IGIDR, Mumbai, India

Abstract


This paper discusses (a) changes in measurement in industry and services (b) changes made in agriculture sector and (c) major issues on the measurement of GDP in new series. There are long term or legacy issues in agriculture, industry and services. The paper examines 10 major issues on measurement of GDP in the new series. These are: (1) MCA 21 data problems; (2) separation of Quasi corporations from household sector; (3) effective labour input method; (4) high growth rate of GDP vs. ground realities; (5) GDP at market prices vs. GVA at basic prices vs. GDP at factor prices; (6) GDP by production and expenditure methods; (7) single vs. double deflation; (8) price deflators WPI vs. CPI; (9) nominal growth vs. real growth; (10) reference point for growth: advance estimates, provisional estimates, first revised estimates and second revised estimates. In our view, although there are some gaps in the measurement ofGDPthe new series and the methodology adopted are based on ‘best advice’ from experts available in the country. The issues discussed in the paper will be useful for next base revision of National Accounts Statistics.

References