Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription Access
Open Access Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Restricted Access Subscription Access

Sources of Differences in Input Use:The Case of Fertiliser in India


Affiliations
1 National Council of Applied Economic Research, Parisila Bhavan, 11, I.P. Estate, New Delhi-110002, India
     

   Subscribe/Renew Journal


In the present study an attempt has been made to figure out the sources of differences in fertiliser use in different states of India. The study reveals that while differences between Punjab and other states are explicable in terms of better technological adoption and better institutional and distributional facilities provided to this state, differences between Gujarat and other states which use less fertiliser, despite having good rainfall have been due to the credit and distributional facilities provided to this state. Major policy implications which emerge from this study are that in order to boost fertiliser demand in areas where the irrigation infrastructure is poorly developed, appropriate credit and distributional network policies are required. It is also suggested that irrigation infrastructure should also deserve high priority along with more and more efforts to bring area under high yielding varieties. Efforts should also be made to increase income of the farmer so as to enable him to adopt modern technology. Price related measures tend to be unrewarding. This study on India is equally important to other developing countries of the world also.
User
Subscription Login to verify subscription
Notifications
Font Size

Abstract Views: 244

PDF Views: 0




  • Sources of Differences in Input Use:The Case of Fertiliser in India

Abstract Views: 244  |  PDF Views: 0

Authors

Anil Kumar Sharma
National Council of Applied Economic Research, Parisila Bhavan, 11, I.P. Estate, New Delhi-110002, India

Abstract


In the present study an attempt has been made to figure out the sources of differences in fertiliser use in different states of India. The study reveals that while differences between Punjab and other states are explicable in terms of better technological adoption and better institutional and distributional facilities provided to this state, differences between Gujarat and other states which use less fertiliser, despite having good rainfall have been due to the credit and distributional facilities provided to this state. Major policy implications which emerge from this study are that in order to boost fertiliser demand in areas where the irrigation infrastructure is poorly developed, appropriate credit and distributional network policies are required. It is also suggested that irrigation infrastructure should also deserve high priority along with more and more efforts to bring area under high yielding varieties. Efforts should also be made to increase income of the farmer so as to enable him to adopt modern technology. Price related measures tend to be unrewarding. This study on India is equally important to other developing countries of the world also.