Journal of Intellectual Property Rights

Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription Access

Climate Change and the Patent Regime:Are Patents the Answer?


Affiliations
1 Jindal Global University, Sonipat Narela Road, Sonipat, Haryana 131 001, Haryana, India
 

Next to nuclear annihilation, climate change poses the greatest threat to life as we know it. Climate refugees are becoming a reality and it is expected that by 2050 most of the Pacific Islands will be under water. Forward-thinking nations have made it their agenda to curb the effects of climate change and ensure the reduction in emissions of greenhouse gases.1 To effectively combat climate change, the deployment of clean energy technologies to combat the effect of carbon emissions from fossil fuelshas been the tool of choice.2 Accelerated development and deployment of these clean energy technologies is imperative. The public and private sectors must boost the creation and distribution of clean as well as environmentally sound technologies – something along the magnitude and scale of the space race during the cold war. Addressing the threats posed by climate change requires a portfolio of processes such as extensive introduction of new technologies and modification of existing technologies while also creating optimum environments. The role of intellectual property3 pertaining to clean energy technologies becomes of utmost importance. The patent regime, by its very nature, can either be seen as a hindrance or an incentive for the development of new technology.4 This means that an argument can be raised that patents would hinder climate change mitigations as clean technology is patented and licensing it would prove costly. On the other hand, patents will incentivize innovation and therefore lead to advanced technologies to combat climate change.4 The paper, refutes the former and argues that patents are essential and rebut the presumption that patents will increase prices. The paper explains, with examples, how the holy trinity of patent pools, patent databases and compulsory licensing will help make the clean energy technology competitive and accessible. The future and the applicability of fair, reasonable and nondiscriminatory (FRAND) licensing to standardised clean energy technology are also discussed. The paper is concluded with an affirmation that patents are the answer to climate change.

Keywords

TRIPS Agreement, World Intellectual Property Organization, RE100, FRAND Licensing, Greenhouse Gases, Clean Energy Technologies, Climate Mitigation, Intellectual Property Rights, Pharmaceutical Industry, Patent Pool, Patent Databases, Compulsory Licensing.
User
Notifications
Font Size

  • Paris Agreement, United Nations, 12 December 2015, (accessed in May 2017).

  • James T, The biggest clean energy advances in 2016, MIT Technology Review, 29 December 2016.

  • Through the course of the paper we use intellectual property and patents interchangeably as the primary intellectual property right pertinent to clean technology would be patents.

  • How patents encourage innovation in technological development and deployment Global CCS Institute.

  • Cannady C, Access to Climate Change Technology by Developing Countries, A Practical Strategy, ICTSD’s Programme on IPRs and Sustainable Development, International Centre for Trade and Sustainable Development, Geneva, Switzerland. 25 (2010) 1-10.

  • Copenhagen Economics and The IPR Company, Are IPR a Barrier to the Transfer of Climate Change Technology? (19 January 2009).

  • Development and Disarmament Roundtable. Climate mitigation and intellectual property in tension, Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists, 04 May 2015.

  • Chatterjee P, India: Balancing public and private interests in the intellectual property regime, Intellectual Property Watch, 23 March 2015, www.ip-watch.org/2012/09/18/indiabalancingpublic-and-private-interests-in-the-intellectualpropertyregime/.

  • Poonia M, Importance of patents in pharmaceutical industry, 17 December 2015, http://www.pharmabiz.com/ArticleDetails.aspx?aid=92383&sid=21.

  • Wines M, China Outlines Ambitious Plan for Stimulus, New York Times, http:// www.nytimes.com/2009/03/05/ world/asia/05china.htm (2009).

  • WIPO Magazine, Sharing technology to meet a common challenge: Navigating proposals for patent pools, patent commons and open innovation, WIPO Magazine Issue 2, 4-7 April 2009.

  • World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO) (2008), World Patent Report, World Intellectual Property Organization, Geneva, Switzerland.

  • Moyo D, Dead Aid: Why Aid is Not Working and How There Is a Better Way For Africa, Farrar, Straus and Giroux, New York, USA, (2009).

  • Public Health FAQ, WTO TRIPS, https://www.wto.org/ english/tratop_e/trips_e/public_health_faq_e.htm (accessed on 11 October 2017).

  • Sara M Ford, Compulsory licensing provisions under the TRIPS Agreement: Balancing pills and patents, American University International Law review, 15 (4) (2000) 941, 953. Discussing the long-standing conflict between the right to access life-saving medication and the profit-driven agendas of pharmaceutical companies in restricting such access.

  • Chemically known as ‘Sorafenib Tosylate’, the drug is used for the treatment of advanced stage liver and kidney cancer. By stopping the growth of new blood vessels and impacting other cellular growth mechanisms, the drug can extend the life of a patient, the duration being between 6 months and 5 years.

  • Bayer Corporation v Natco Pharma Ltd., Order No. 45/2013 (Intellectual Property Appellate Board, Chennai), http://www.ipab.tn.nic.in/045-2013.htm (accessed on 12 May 2013).

  • RE 100 Annual Report 2016, http://www.se4all.org/ sites/default/files/RE100-Annual-Report2016.pdf (accessed on 13 October 2017).

  • WIPO, Patent Landscapes Reports Project on Solar on Solar Cooking, 2011.

  • Abbott F, Innovation and Technology Transfer to Address Climate Change, Lessons from the Global Debate on Intellectual Property and Public Health, Intellectual Property and Sustainable Development Series, Issue Paper Number 24, ICTSD, June 2009, http://ictsd.org/i/publications/50454/.

  • Poonia M, Importance of patents in pharmaceutical industry, 17 December 2015, http://www.pharmabiz.com/ ArticleDetails.aspx?aid=92383&sid=21.

  • Consumer Protection Concerns As Big Tech Centres the Energy Markets, FORBES, https://www.forbes.com/ sites/uhenergy/2017/09/13/consumer-protection-concerns-asbigtech-enters-the-energy-markets/2/#7849c0c039c9 (accessed on 13 October 2017).

  • Sustainable Signals: The Individual Investor Perspective, Morgan Stanley, https://www.morganstanley.com/ sustainableinvesting/pdf/Sustainable_Signals.pdf, (accessed on 13 October 2017).

  • Sweeney James L, The California Electricity Crisis: Lessons for the Future, National Academy of Engineering of the Nation Academies, (Summer 2002). https://www.ukessays.com/ essays/engineering/role-enron-collapse-california-4854.php.


Abstract Views: 184

PDF Views: 123




  • Climate Change and the Patent Regime:Are Patents the Answer?

Abstract Views: 184  |  PDF Views: 123

Authors

A. Rosencranz
Jindal Global University, Sonipat Narela Road, Sonipat, Haryana 131 001, Haryana, India
P. Modi
Jindal Global University, Sonipat Narela Road, Sonipat, Haryana 131 001, Haryana, India
S. Parab
Jindal Global University, Sonipat Narela Road, Sonipat, Haryana 131 001, Haryana, India
A. Vora
Jindal Global University, Sonipat Narela Road, Sonipat, Haryana 131 001, Haryana, India

Abstract


Next to nuclear annihilation, climate change poses the greatest threat to life as we know it. Climate refugees are becoming a reality and it is expected that by 2050 most of the Pacific Islands will be under water. Forward-thinking nations have made it their agenda to curb the effects of climate change and ensure the reduction in emissions of greenhouse gases.1 To effectively combat climate change, the deployment of clean energy technologies to combat the effect of carbon emissions from fossil fuelshas been the tool of choice.2 Accelerated development and deployment of these clean energy technologies is imperative. The public and private sectors must boost the creation and distribution of clean as well as environmentally sound technologies – something along the magnitude and scale of the space race during the cold war. Addressing the threats posed by climate change requires a portfolio of processes such as extensive introduction of new technologies and modification of existing technologies while also creating optimum environments. The role of intellectual property3 pertaining to clean energy technologies becomes of utmost importance. The patent regime, by its very nature, can either be seen as a hindrance or an incentive for the development of new technology.4 This means that an argument can be raised that patents would hinder climate change mitigations as clean technology is patented and licensing it would prove costly. On the other hand, patents will incentivize innovation and therefore lead to advanced technologies to combat climate change.4 The paper, refutes the former and argues that patents are essential and rebut the presumption that patents will increase prices. The paper explains, with examples, how the holy trinity of patent pools, patent databases and compulsory licensing will help make the clean energy technology competitive and accessible. The future and the applicability of fair, reasonable and nondiscriminatory (FRAND) licensing to standardised clean energy technology are also discussed. The paper is concluded with an affirmation that patents are the answer to climate change.

Keywords


TRIPS Agreement, World Intellectual Property Organization, RE100, FRAND Licensing, Greenhouse Gases, Clean Energy Technologies, Climate Mitigation, Intellectual Property Rights, Pharmaceutical Industry, Patent Pool, Patent Databases, Compulsory Licensing.

References