Journal of Intellectual Property Rights

Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription Access

The Death of Criticism: Moral Rights v Fair Dealing in the Indian Context


Affiliations
1 Jindal Global Law School, O P Jindal Global University, Sonipat — 131 001, Haryana, India., India
2 Aretha Legal, New Delhi — 110 017, Delhi, India., India
 

Copyright protection is a legal force which has the power to encourage creators/authors by creating propriety rights in intangible assets. However, its purpose is not limited to serving creators. It also has the onus to balance out the interests of the society by ensuring reasonable access of ideas to the publicat large. Moral rights and fair dealing exist at the two extremes of this incentive-access balance, necessitating friction incertain cases. This paper is aimed at highlighting a gap in the Indian legal context, where moral rights have become broad enough to pose a threat to fair dealing, particularly criticism, which is one of the most important aspects of development in any field. Pursuant to this aim, the paper puts forward an argument to subjugate moral rights to fair dealing through legislative amendments. Further, it suggests two judicial standards to navigate through the grey waters of the aforementioned friction.

Keywords

Moral Rights, Fair Dealing, Criticism, Public Interest, Right of Integrity.
User
Notifications
Font Size

  • Hawking S W, The Theory of Everything: The Origin and Fate of the Universe, (Phoenix Books) 2006.

  • Khobragade J W & Anson C J, Fair use provisions under the Indian Copyright Act: Awareness among librarians of colleges and universities in Maharashtra, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 27 (2022) 7-15.

  • Vezina B, Moral Rights: Shortcomings and Drawbacks Addressing Misuse, Centre for International Governance Innovation(2020) https://www.jstor.org/stable/ resrep 25328.9#metadata_info_tab_contents (accessed on 28 September 2022).

  • Petrolis M A, An immoral fight: Shielding moral rights with First Amendment Jurisprudence when fair use battles with actual malice, The John Marshall Review of Intellectual Property, 8 (190) (2009), https://repository.law.uic.edu/ripl/ vol8/iss1/8/ (accessed on 30September 2022).

  • Yonover G J, The precarious balance: Moral rights, parody and fair use, Cardozo Arts & Entertainment Law Journal, 14 (1) (1996) 79-126 https://heinonline.org/HOL/ LandingPage? handle=hein.journals/caelj14&div=9&id=&page= (accessed on 11 October 2022).

  • The Visual Rights Act of 1990, 17 U.S.C 106A.

  • Hansmann H &Santilli M, Authors’ and artists’ moral rights: A comparative legal and economic analysis, The Journal of Legal Studies, 26 (1) (1997) 95-143, https://www.jstor.org/ stable/10.1086/467990#metadata_info_tab_contents (accessed on 11 October 2022).

  • Masiyakurima P, The trouble with moral rights, The Modern Law Review, 68 (3) (2005) 411-434, https://www. jstor.org/stable/3699169#metadata_info_tab_contents (accessed on 18 October 2022).

  • Adler A M, Against moral rights, California Law Review, 97 (1) (2009) 263-300.

  • Vezina B, Moral rights: Copyright’s poor relation, in a moral rights approach, Centre for International Governance Innovation,2020.

  • Vezina B, A moral rights approach, Centre for International Governance Innovation,2020.

  • Rajan M T S, Moral rights in the public domain: Copyright matters in the works of Indian national poet C Subramania Bharti, Singapore Journal of Legal Studies,2001, 161-195, https://www.jstor.org/stable/24868216#metadata_info_tab_c ontents (accessed on 20 October 2022).

  • Berne Convention for the Protection of Literary and Artistic Works, 9 September 1886, 828 U.N.T.S 221, Article 6bis.

  • Agreement on Trade-Related Aspects of Intellectual Property Rights, 15 April 1994, Article 9.

  • The Copyright Act, 1957, Section 57.

  • The Copyright (Amendment) Act, 1994.

  • Amarnath Sehgalv Union of India117 (2005) DLT 717.

  • Priyadarshi G & Chandrashekhar A C, Fair dealing under Indian Copyright Act: A defense against claim of infringement of literary works, NUALS Law Journal,5 (71) (2011) 71-79.

  • Ball H G, The Law of Copyright and Literary Property, (M. Bender & Company Incorporated) 1994, 260.

  • Agreement on Trade-Related Aspects of Intellectual Property Rights, 15 April 1994, Article 13.

  • Goel A, Limits of fair dealing with literary works in India, University of Botswana Law Journal, 11 (2010) 169-176.

  • United States Code: Copyright Office, 1958, 17 U.S.C 201-216.

  • Folsomv Marsh 9 F. Cas 342.

  • The Copyright Act, 1957, Section 54.

  • Hubbard v Vosper [1972] 2 Q.B. 84.

  • Civic Chandran vAmmini Amma (1996) PTC (16) 670 (Ker.).

  • Brenson M, Art view; The Messy Saga of Tilted Arc Is Far From Over, (The New York Times, 2 April 1989).

  • LevinsonS, Written in Stone: Public Monuments in Changing Societies(Duke University Press) 2018.

  • www.bbc.com (30 October 2022) (accessed on 2 November 2022).

  • Krauss R, Changing the work of David Smith, Art Journal, 43 (1) (1983) 89-95.

  • Kramer H, Altering of Smith Work Stirs Dispute, (The New York Times, 13 September 1974).

  • Latman A, Gorman R A & Ginsburg J C, Copyright for the Nineties: Cases and Materials, (Michie Company) 1989.

  • Campbellv Acuff Rose Music Inc. 510 U.S. 569 (1994).

  • Manet E, The Luncheon in the Grass(1862), kept in Musee d’Orsay, Paris, France.

  • Chaman Lal vState of Punjab, (1970) 1 SCC 590.

  • The Constitution of India, Article 19 (1) (a).

  • Baldia S, Intellectual property in global sourcing: The art of the transfer, Georgetown Journal of International Law, 38 (3) (2006) 499, https://heinonline.org/HOL/ LandingPage? handle=hein.journals/geojintl38&div=25&id=&page= (accessed on 8 November 2022).


Abstract Views: 211

PDF Views: 124




  • The Death of Criticism: Moral Rights v Fair Dealing in the Indian Context

Abstract Views: 211  |  PDF Views: 124

Authors

Sakshat Bansal
Jindal Global Law School, O P Jindal Global University, Sonipat — 131 001, Haryana, India., India
Ananya Vajpeyi
Aretha Legal, New Delhi — 110 017, Delhi, India., India

Abstract


Copyright protection is a legal force which has the power to encourage creators/authors by creating propriety rights in intangible assets. However, its purpose is not limited to serving creators. It also has the onus to balance out the interests of the society by ensuring reasonable access of ideas to the publicat large. Moral rights and fair dealing exist at the two extremes of this incentive-access balance, necessitating friction incertain cases. This paper is aimed at highlighting a gap in the Indian legal context, where moral rights have become broad enough to pose a threat to fair dealing, particularly criticism, which is one of the most important aspects of development in any field. Pursuant to this aim, the paper puts forward an argument to subjugate moral rights to fair dealing through legislative amendments. Further, it suggests two judicial standards to navigate through the grey waters of the aforementioned friction.

Keywords


Moral Rights, Fair Dealing, Criticism, Public Interest, Right of Integrity.

References