Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription Access

Decussating Aspects of Intellectual Property Rights and Private International Law in India


Affiliations
1 School of Law, Dr. Vishwanath Karad MIT-World Peace University, Pune - 411 038, Maharashtra, India
 

Intellectual property issues are covered by international contracts and need private enforcement, or steps taken in court by private parties. These legal actions are governed by the legislation of the nation where the lawsuit is filed and are based on the territoriality concept. A thriving private international law may contribute to the system in ways that go well beyond resolving individual conflicts because it acknowledges the expressive and formative power of judicial decision-making. National courts had played limited part in the development of global intellectual property law under the conventional framework controlling matters relating to intellectual property. The lack of willingness on the part of courts to consider claims involving external intellectual property rights resulted in a pattern of domestic litigation of foreign conflicts, typically based on a right similar to that given by the municipal law system in effect at the time. When it came to intellectual property rights, litigation only involved the domestic rights discussed in municipal law. It did, however, get national courts thinking about situations with global implications, which led to the incorporation of private international law into IP protections. In an effort to better understand the Indian perspective on foreign intellectual property concerns, this study examines the laws that govern IPR violation, validity, ownership, and the difficulties of implementing abroad court judgments.

Keywords

Intellectual Property Rights, Private International Law, Choice of Law, Jurisdiction
User
Notifications
Font Size

  • Agarwal V, International Law: Intellectual property and outsourcing to India, GP Solo, 29 (4) (2012) 68– 69.
  • Corbett R J T, Protecting and enforcing intellectual property rights in developing countries, The International Lawyer, 35 (3) (2001) 1083–103.
  • Hague Agreement Concerning the International Registration of Industrial Designs (Hague Agreement Concerning the International Registration of Industrial Designs) https://www. wipo.int/treaties/en/registration/ hague/ (accessed on 5 September 2022).
  • Sharma D K, Intellectual property and the need to protect it, Indian Journal of Science and Research, 9 (2014) 84-87. 5 Article 7 of the Hague Conference on Private International Law, 1955.
  • Article 1 of the Hague Conference on Private International Law, 1955.
  • Sharan S, India: Process of services of summons in India under the Hague Convention http://www.mondaq.com/india/x/433154/ Internationa l+Courts+Tribunals/Process+Of+Service+Of+ Summ ons+In+India+Under+The+Hague+Convention#_ftn1 (accessed on 5 September 2022).
  • Cuts International Jaipur, Intellectual property rights, biodiversity and traditional knowledge, Monographs on Globalisation and Indian-Myths and Realities, 13 (2007) 20-22.
  • Convention of 18 March 1970 on the Taking of Evidence Abroad in Civil or Commercial Matters, HCCH 1970 Evidence Convention, https://assets.hcch.net/docs/ec1fc148-c2b1-49dcba2f- 65f45cb2b2d3.pdf (accessed on 5 September 2022).
  • Bennett A & Granata S, When Private International Law Meets Intellectual Property Law – A Guide for Judges, WIPO, https://www.wipo.int/edocs/pubdocs/en/wipo_pub_10 53.pdf (accessed on 15 October 2022).
  • Caterpillar Inc. v Kailash Nichani (2002) 97 DLT 304.
  • Article 16(4) of the Brussels Convention, 1968, “The following courts shall have exclusive jurisdiction, regardless of domicile: 4. in proceedings concerned with the registration or validity of patents, trademarks, designs, or other similar rights required to be deposited or registered, the courts of the Contracting State in which the deposit or registration has been applied for, has taken place or is under the terms of an international convention deemed to have taken place”
  • Duijnstee v Goderbauer, ECJ 15 Nov 1983.
  • Indian Performing Rights Society Ltd. v Sanjay Dalia, (2015) 10 SCC 161.
  • M/S. Dhodha House v S.K. Maingi 2006 (9) SCC 41.
  • Ultra-Home Construction Pvt Ltd v Purushottam Kumar Chaubey and Ors. (2015) DLT178.
  • Phoolan Devi v Shekhar Kapoor and Ors 57 (1995) DLT 195.
  • Suresh Jindal v Rizsoli Corriere Delia Sera Prodzioni T.V.S.P. A. AIR 1995 SC 2092.
  • Modi Entertainment Network v W.S.G. Cricket Pte ltd, 2003 AIR SCW 733.
  • Anup T, Indian Inflow: The Interplay of Foreign Investment and Intellectual Property, Third World Quarterly, 19 (1) (1998) 87–113.
  • Mirani S & Poddar M., Arbitrability of IP Disputes in India – A Blanket Bar, Kluwer Arbitration Blog, http://arbitrationblog. kluwerarbitration.com/2019/03/09/arbitrability-of-ip-disputes-inindia- a-blanket-bar/ (accessed on 5 November 2022).
  • Convention on the Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Judgments in Civil and Commercial matters, https://www.hcch. net/en/instruments/conventions/full-text/?cid=78 (accessed on 5 November 2022).
  • Section 13 of the Indian Civil Procedure Code, 1908.
  • Section 14 of the Indian Civil Procedure Code, 1908.
  • Section 144A of the Indian Civil Procedure Code, 1908.
  • Keg Technologies Inc. v Reinhart Lainer No. 1:04-cv- 00253- RWS (N.D.Ga. Oct, 28 2005).
  • Ghose A & Ali SM Aamir, Protection of cuisine under intellectual property law: A Global Perspective, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 27 (3) (2022) 171-180.
  • Barton B, Intellectual property law and the sumptuary code, Harvard Law Review, 123(4) (2010) 810–89.
  • Euro Kids International Private Limited v Bhaskar Vidhyapeeth Shikshan Sanstha 2015 (4) Bom. C. R. 734.
  • Chokhi Dhani Resorts Private Limited v Essem Recreation 2014 (1) CLT 534.

Abstract Views: 53

PDF Views: 40




  • Decussating Aspects of Intellectual Property Rights and Private International Law in India

Abstract Views: 53  |  PDF Views: 40

Authors

Aastha Gilda
School of Law, Dr. Vishwanath Karad MIT-World Peace University, Pune - 411 038, Maharashtra, India
Anuttama Ghose
School of Law, Dr. Vishwanath Karad MIT-World Peace University, Pune - 411 038, Maharashtra, India

Abstract


Intellectual property issues are covered by international contracts and need private enforcement, or steps taken in court by private parties. These legal actions are governed by the legislation of the nation where the lawsuit is filed and are based on the territoriality concept. A thriving private international law may contribute to the system in ways that go well beyond resolving individual conflicts because it acknowledges the expressive and formative power of judicial decision-making. National courts had played limited part in the development of global intellectual property law under the conventional framework controlling matters relating to intellectual property. The lack of willingness on the part of courts to consider claims involving external intellectual property rights resulted in a pattern of domestic litigation of foreign conflicts, typically based on a right similar to that given by the municipal law system in effect at the time. When it came to intellectual property rights, litigation only involved the domestic rights discussed in municipal law. It did, however, get national courts thinking about situations with global implications, which led to the incorporation of private international law into IP protections. In an effort to better understand the Indian perspective on foreign intellectual property concerns, this study examines the laws that govern IPR violation, validity, ownership, and the difficulties of implementing abroad court judgments.

Keywords


Intellectual Property Rights, Private International Law, Choice of Law, Jurisdiction

References