Intellectual property issues are covered by international contracts and need private enforcement, or steps taken in court by private parties. These legal actions are governed by the legislation of the nation where the lawsuit is filed and are based on the territoriality concept. A thriving private international law may contribute to the system in ways that go well beyond resolving individual conflicts because it acknowledges the expressive and formative power of judicial decision-making. National courts had played limited part in the development of global intellectual property law under the conventional framework controlling matters relating to intellectual property. The lack of willingness on the part of courts to consider claims involving external intellectual property rights resulted in a pattern of domestic litigation of foreign conflicts, typically based on a right similar to that given by the municipal law system in effect at the time. When it came to intellectual property rights, litigation only involved the domestic rights discussed in municipal law. It did, however, get national courts thinking about situations with global implications, which led to the incorporation of private international law into IP protections. In an effort to better understand the Indian perspective on foreign intellectual property concerns, this study examines the laws that govern IPR violation, validity, ownership, and the difficulties of implementing abroad court judgments.
Keywords
Intellectual Property Rights, Private International Law, Choice of Law, Jurisdiction
User
Font Size
Information