Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription Access

Trademark Law Declared by the Supreme Court of India in Twenty-First Century (2010 – 2023) – II


Affiliations
1 National Law Institute University, Bhopal - 462 044, Madhya Pradesh, India
2 Jindal Global Law School, O.P. Jindal Global University, Sonipat - 131 001, Haryana, India
 

The Parliament of India amends and makes and unmakes the law. The Supreme Court of India (hereinafter, the Supreme Court), does not merely decide a lis in personam but also declares the law on a question that it decides to answer. The law so declared by the Supreme Court becomes binding in rem by virtue of Article 141 of the Constitution of India (hereinafter, the Constitution). The Supreme Court, by virtue of Article 141 of the Constitution, declares the law and makes and unmakes the law while deciding cases through the process of judicial review and interpretation-construction. In the second and third decades of twenty-first century, the Supreme Court has, on an average, decided 1.86 (point eight six) cases in a year, or one trademark case in 196.07 (point zero seven) days, or one case in .53 (point five three) year. A review of the reported decisions on the Trade Marks Act, 1999 (hereinafter, the Trade Marks Act) reveals that the Supreme Court has: (i) delivered a total of 27 decisions including a few decisions in which the Trade Marks Act finds only a reference; (ii) declared trademark law and iron out the creases of law by interpreting the text of the statutes; (iii) not declared anything on the constitutionality of the trademark statutes as no such question of constitutionality was brought before it; (iv) delivered all the decisions unanimously as no dissenting or concurring judgment is reported; (v) decided maximum number of cases by Division Bench (21 cases) constituting 77.77 (point seven seven) percent, followed by Full Bench (5 cases) constituting 18.51 (point five one) percent, and 1 by Single Bench constituting 3.7 (point seven) percent; and (vi) decided only one trademark case by a Single Bench which is reported from the third decade of this century. A total of 39 judges were on the bench deciding the 27 trademark cases. It has been observed that no sitting Chief Justice of India was on the bench in any of the trademark cases. Paper proceeds with the same argument and method as developed and adopted in the papers covering patent law, copyright law, design law and trademark law in twentieth and twenty-first centuries published under the theme„IP Laws Declared by the Supreme Court). This Paper seeks to cull out the principles of trademark law declared by the Supreme Court in the second and third decades of the twenty-first century.

Keywords

Trademark, Supreme Court of India, Law Declared, Article 141, The Constitution of India, The Trade Marks Act 1940, The Trade and Merchandise Marks Act, 1958, The Trade Marks Act, 1999, Bench, Decisions, Dissenting, Concurring, Constructed Meaning, Princip
User
Notifications
Font Size

  • In this Paper, the expression ‗interpretation-construction‘ has been used in the same sense as explicated by Lawrence B Solum. Solum L B, The Interpretation-Construction Distinction, Constitutional Commentary, 27 (2010) 95–218.
  • Raza A &Alam G, Patent Law declared by the Supreme Court of India, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 28 (1) (2023) 46–67.
  • Raza A, Alam G & Talib M A, Copyright Law declared by the Supreme Court of India, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 28 (2) (2023) 151–170.
  • Raza A &Alam G, Design Law declared by the Supreme Court of India, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 28 (3) (2023) 236–241.
  • Raza A &Alam G, Trademark Law declared by the Supreme Court of India in twentieth-century, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 28 (4) (2023) 334–346.
  • Raza A &Alam G, Trademark Law declared by the Supreme Court of India in twenty-first century (2000-2009)––I, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 28 (5) (2023) 445–460.
  • Supreme Court of India; https://main.sci.gov.in/history#:~: text=On%20the%2028th%20of%20January,the%20House%20of%20the%20People (accessed on 12 August 2023).
  • The decisions on Trademark Law have been taken from the Judgment Information System of the Supreme Court (JUDIS), https://main.sci.gov.in/judgments (accessed on 1 August 2022). For the purposes of citations: Supreme Court Reports (SCR), TruePrint copies from Supreme Court Cases (SCC), SCC OnLine, Supreme Court Almanac (SCALE) and All India Reporter (AIR) have been referred and relied upon. Where, the judgment is not available on the above-mentioned judgment reporters, reliance has been placed on the judgment copy as available on JUDIS.
  • (2010) 2 SCC 142.
  • (2023) 7 SCC 295.
  • (2018) 18 SCC 346.
  • (2001) 5 SCC 73.
  • (2010) 2 SCC 142, 153.
  • (2010) 8 SCC 401.
  • The Trade Marks Act, 1999 (Act 47 of 1999).
  • (2010) 8 SCC 401, 406.
  • (2010) 8 SCC 423.
  • (2011) 1 SCC 125.
  • Act 43 of 1958.
  • (2011) 1 SCC 125, 136.
  • Lord Romer‘s judgment in Royal Baking Powder Company v Wright, Crossley and Co, (1898) 15 RPC 377.
  • Hardie Trading Ltd v Addisons Paint & Chemicals Limited, (2003) 11 SCC 92; Kabushiki Kaisha Toshiba v Toshiba Appliances Co., (2008) 10 SCC 766.
  • (2011) 1 SCC 125, 139–140.
  • (2011) 1 SCC 125, 140.
  • (2011) 4 SCC 85.
  • (2011) 4 SCC 85, 120.
  • (2012) 1 SCC 578.
  • Act 47 of 1963.
  • Act 9 of 1872.
  • (2012) 1 SCC 578, 591.
  • (2014) 14 SCC 782.
  • Hardie Trading Ltd v Addisons Paint & Chemicals Limited, (2003) 11 SCC 92.
  • (1996) 9 SCC 930.
  • (2014) 14 SCC 782, 787.
  • (2014) 14 SCC 331.
  • (2015) 1 SCC 160.
  • (2015) 13 SCC 466.
  • (2015) 10 SCC 161.
  • The Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (Act 5 of 1908).
  • The Copyright Act, 1957 (Act 14 of 1957).
  • (2015) 10 SCC 161, 177.
  • (2015) 10 SCC 161, 178.
  • (2015) 10 SCC 161, 178–179.
  • (2015) 10 SCC 161, 179.
  • (2015) 10 SCC 161, 197.
  • (2016) 2 SCC 683.
  • (2016) 2 SCC 683, 698.
  • (2016) 2 SCC 683, 698–699.
  • (2016) 2 SCC 683, 699.
  • (2016) 2 SCC 683, 700.
  • (2016) 2 SCC 683, 701.
  • (2016) 2 SCC 683, 702.
  • (2016) 2 SCC 683, 704.
  • (2016) 2 SCC 672.
  • (2016) 2 SCC 672, 680.
  • (2018) 2 SCC 112.
  • (2018) 2 SCC 112, 127–128.
  • (2018) 2 SCC 112, 128.
  • (2018) 2 SCC 112, 129.
  • (2018) 2 SCC 112, 129–130.
  • (2018) 2 SCC 112, 130–131.
  • (2018) 2 SCC 112, 131.
  • (2018) 1 SCC 728.
  • (2018) 2 SCC 1.
  • (2018) 2 SCC 1, 17-18.
  • (2018) 2 SCC 1, 18.
  • (2018) 2 SCC 1, 19.
  • (2018) 2 SCC 1, 20.
  • (2018) 9 SCC 183.
  • Judgment dated 7 May 1953, Civil Appeal No. 135 of 1952, para 12 of the judgment. Judgment Information System (JUDIS) of the Supreme Court, https://main.sci.gov.in/ judgment/judis/1030.pdf; accessed 12 August 2023. This judgment has been covered in: Raza A &Alam G, Trademark Law declared by the Supreme Court of India in twentieth-century, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 28 (4) (2023) 334–346, 336; reference number 14.
  • (2018) 9 SCC 183, 211.
  • (2018) 9 SCC 183, 213–214.
  • (2018) 18 SCC 346. 74 (2002) 3 SCC 65. This judgment has been covered in: Raza A &Alam G, Trademark Law declared by the Supreme Court of India in twenty-first century (2000–2009), Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 28 (5) (2023) 445–460, 451; reference number 41. 75 (2004) 6 SCC 145. This judgment has been covered in: Raza A &Alam G, Trademark Law declared by the Supreme Court of India in twenty-first century (2000–2009), Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 28 (5) (2023) 445–460, 452; reference number 51.
  • (2021) 4 SCC 519.
  • (2023) 7 SCC 295.
  • 2021 SCC OnLine SC 378.
  • (2022) 5 SCC 1.
  • (2022) 5 SCC 1, 18.
  • (2022) 5 SCC 1, 21–22.
  • (2022) 5 SCC 1, 23.
  • (2022) 5 SCC 1, 25.
  • (2022) 5 SCC 1, 25–26.
  • (2022) 5 SCC 1, 27.
  • (2022) 5 SCC 1, 28.
  • (2022) 5 SCC 1, 28–29.
  • (2022) 5 SCC 1, 32.
  • 2022 SCC OnLine SC 114.
  • (2022) 5 SCC 449.
  • (2023) 1 SCC 634.
  • (2023) 1 SCC 634, 658.
  • Civil Appeal No. 5007 of 2008, Judgment dated 6 April 2022.
  • 2023 SCC OnLine SC 95. 95 (1998) 8 SCC 1. This judgment has been covered in: Raza A &Alam G, Trademark law declared by the Supreme Court of India in twentieth-century, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 28 (4) (2023) 334–346, 344; reference number 83.
  • (2023) 7 SCC 295.
  • In the first decade of twenty-first century (2000–2009), the Supreme Court has on an average decided 2.3 (point three) trademark cases in a year; or one trademark case in 158.82 (point eight two) days or in .43 (point four three) years.
  • In the twentieth century (from 28 January 1950 to 1999), the Supreme Court has on an average decided .38 (point three eight) trademark case in a year; or one trademark case in 978.94 (point nine four) days, or in 2.68 (point six eight) years.
  • For related discussion, Raza A &Alam G, Theoretical underpinnings of Trademark Law: Decisions of the Supreme Court of India, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 27 (5) (2023) 351–366.
  • Panesar S, Theories of private property in modern property law, Denning Law Journal, 15 (2000) 113–138; Hettinger C H, Justifying Intellectual Property, Philosophy and Public Affairs, 18 (1989) 31–52.
  • For the approach of the Supreme Court in cases dealing with the trademarks law, see generally the last two papers on the Trademark Law declared by the Supreme Court of India that have covered the reported decisions from the twentieth-century and the first decade of the twenty-first century: Raza A&Alam G, Trademark Law declared by the supreme court of india in twentieth-century, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 28 (4) (2023) 334–346; and Raza A & Alam G, Trademark Law declared by the Supreme Court of India in twenty-first century (2000-2009)––I, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 28 (5) (2023) 445–460.

Abstract Views: 60

PDF Views: 39




  • Trademark Law Declared by the Supreme Court of India in Twenty-First Century (2010 – 2023) – II

Abstract Views: 60  |  PDF Views: 39

Authors

Ghayur Alam
National Law Institute University, Bhopal - 462 044, Madhya Pradesh, India
Aqa Raza
Jindal Global Law School, O.P. Jindal Global University, Sonipat - 131 001, Haryana, India

Abstract


The Parliament of India amends and makes and unmakes the law. The Supreme Court of India (hereinafter, the Supreme Court), does not merely decide a lis in personam but also declares the law on a question that it decides to answer. The law so declared by the Supreme Court becomes binding in rem by virtue of Article 141 of the Constitution of India (hereinafter, the Constitution). The Supreme Court, by virtue of Article 141 of the Constitution, declares the law and makes and unmakes the law while deciding cases through the process of judicial review and interpretation-construction. In the second and third decades of twenty-first century, the Supreme Court has, on an average, decided 1.86 (point eight six) cases in a year, or one trademark case in 196.07 (point zero seven) days, or one case in .53 (point five three) year. A review of the reported decisions on the Trade Marks Act, 1999 (hereinafter, the Trade Marks Act) reveals that the Supreme Court has: (i) delivered a total of 27 decisions including a few decisions in which the Trade Marks Act finds only a reference; (ii) declared trademark law and iron out the creases of law by interpreting the text of the statutes; (iii) not declared anything on the constitutionality of the trademark statutes as no such question of constitutionality was brought before it; (iv) delivered all the decisions unanimously as no dissenting or concurring judgment is reported; (v) decided maximum number of cases by Division Bench (21 cases) constituting 77.77 (point seven seven) percent, followed by Full Bench (5 cases) constituting 18.51 (point five one) percent, and 1 by Single Bench constituting 3.7 (point seven) percent; and (vi) decided only one trademark case by a Single Bench which is reported from the third decade of this century. A total of 39 judges were on the bench deciding the 27 trademark cases. It has been observed that no sitting Chief Justice of India was on the bench in any of the trademark cases. Paper proceeds with the same argument and method as developed and adopted in the papers covering patent law, copyright law, design law and trademark law in twentieth and twenty-first centuries published under the theme„IP Laws Declared by the Supreme Court). This Paper seeks to cull out the principles of trademark law declared by the Supreme Court in the second and third decades of the twenty-first century.

Keywords


Trademark, Supreme Court of India, Law Declared, Article 141, The Constitution of India, The Trade Marks Act 1940, The Trade and Merchandise Marks Act, 1958, The Trade Marks Act, 1999, Bench, Decisions, Dissenting, Concurring, Constructed Meaning, Princip

References