Journal of Library Development

Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription Access

Next Generation of Catalogues:A Comparative Analysis of Opacs of University Libraries in India


Affiliations
1 Indian Maritime University, Chennai Campus, Chennai, India
2 SDM Institute for Management Development (SDMIMD), Mysore, India
 

The Next Generation Online Public Access Catalogue (OPAC), generally termed as OPAC 2.0, is the results of continuous rethinking and reworking to make the information retrieval more effective, efficient and elegant with improved searching experiences. This paper attempts to list the OPAC functionalities by studying the OPAC 2.0 features available in representatives of all three types of software – commercial, open source and free. This paper attempts to compare the features available in the OPAC of ten universities against the listed expectations. Effort is also made to understand the level of OPAC 2.0 in the software adopted by these universities for integration of e-Resources, and interoperability standards.

Keywords

OPAC, Information Retrieval, OPAC 2.0., Library Automation, Online Catalogue.
User
Notifications
Font Size

  • Aligarh Muslim University (1875). Retrieved September 11, 2015, from http://webopac.amu.ac.in:8080/opac/

  • Ballard, T., & Blaine, A. (2011). User search-limiting behaviour in online catalogs: Comparing classic catalog use to search behaviour in next-generation catalogs.New Library World, 112(5/6), 261-273.

  • Breeding, M. (2014).Perceptions 2013: an International survey of library automation. Retrieved from http://www.librarytechnology.org/perceptions2013.pl

  • Calcutta University Library. (1857). Retrieved September 20, 2015, from http://www.caluniv.ac.in/opac/index.html

  • Delhi University Library. (1922). Retrieved September 20, 2015, from http://dulsopac.du.ac.in/Default.aspx

  • Dempsey, L. (2006). The library catalogue in the new discovery environment: Some thoughts. Ariadne, (48), 4.

  • Golder, S. A., & Huberman, B. A. (2006). Usage patterns of collaborative tagging systems. Journal of information science, 32(2), 198-208.

  • Gujarat University Library. (1949). Retrieved September 20, 2015, from http://14.139.122.29/webopac/main.aspx

  • Gupta, A., & Kumar, A. (2006).Handbook of universities (Vol. 1, p. 472). New Delhi: Atlantic & Distributors.

  • Gupta, A., & Kumar, A. (2006).Handbook of universities (Vol. 2, p. 897). New Delhi: Atlantic & Distributors.

  • Haravu, L.J. (2004). Library automation: design, principles and practice. New Delhi: Allied Publishers.

  • Karnatak University Library. (1949). Retrieved September 20, 2015, from http://kul-koha.informindia.co.in/

  • Luong, T., & Liew, C. (2009). The evaluation of New Zealand academic library OPACs: A checklist approach. The Electronic Library, 27(3), 376-393.

  • Madhusudhan, M., & Aggarwal, S. (2011). Web-based online public access catalogues of IIT libraries in India: an evaluative study. Program: electronic library and information systems, 45(4), 415-438.

  • Mercun, T., & Žumer, M. (2008). New generation of catalogues for the new generation of users: a comparison of six library catalogues. Program: electronic library and information systems, 42(3), 243-261.

  • Mumbai University Library. (1857). Retrieved September 20, 2015, from http://121.241.25.77/soulwebopac/main.aspx

  • Mysore University Library System catalog. (1916). Retrieved September 20, 2015, from http://libcatmysore-koha.informindia.co.in/

  • Naun, C. C. (2010). Next generation OPACs: A cataloging viewpoint. Cataloguing & Classification Quarterly, 48(4), 330-342.

  • Saurashtra University Library. (1967). Retrieved September 20, 2015, from http://14.139.121.46/SOULWEBOPAC/main.aspx

  • Tam, W., Cox, A. M., & Bussey, A. (2009). Student user preferences for features of next-generation OPACs: a case study of University of Sheffield international students. Program: electronic library and information systems, 43(4), 349-374.

  • The Maharaja Sayajirao University of Baroda Library. (1949). Retrieved September 20, 2015, from http://14.139.121.106/webopac/Default.aspx

  • Welcome to Osmania University Library. (1918). Retrieved September 11, 2015, from http://14.139.82.46:8080/newgenlibctxt/

  • Yang, S. Q., & Wagner, K. (2010). Evaluating and comparing discovery tools: how close are we towards next generation catalog?. Library Hi Tech, 28(4), 690-709.

  • Yang, S. Q., & Hofmann, M. A. (2011).Next generation or current generation? A study of the OPACs of 260 academic libraries in the USA and Canada. Library Hi Tech, 29(2), 266-300.


Abstract Views: 346

PDF Views: 2




  • Next Generation of Catalogues:A Comparative Analysis of Opacs of University Libraries in India

Abstract Views: 346  |  PDF Views: 2

Authors

Chandrappa
Indian Maritime University, Chennai Campus, Chennai, India
M. V. Sunil
SDM Institute for Management Development (SDMIMD), Mysore, India

Abstract


The Next Generation Online Public Access Catalogue (OPAC), generally termed as OPAC 2.0, is the results of continuous rethinking and reworking to make the information retrieval more effective, efficient and elegant with improved searching experiences. This paper attempts to list the OPAC functionalities by studying the OPAC 2.0 features available in representatives of all three types of software – commercial, open source and free. This paper attempts to compare the features available in the OPAC of ten universities against the listed expectations. Effort is also made to understand the level of OPAC 2.0 in the software adopted by these universities for integration of e-Resources, and interoperability standards.

Keywords


OPAC, Information Retrieval, OPAC 2.0., Library Automation, Online Catalogue.

References





DOI: https://doi.org/10.32344/jld%2Fv3%2Fi1%2F2017%2F25-37