Journal of Library Development

Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription Access

Theory Method and Principle of Metrics Science


Affiliations
1 Department of Library and Information Science Karnatak University, Dharwad, India
 

Measurement is an integral part of modern science. This paper proposed a comprehensive statistical overview of the terms librametrics, bibliometrics, scientometrics, informetrics, webometrics and knowledgometrics refer to fields related to the study of the dynamics of disciplines as reflected in the production of their literature. These terms are used to describe similar and overlapping methodologies. The origins, historical survey, scope, application and development of each of these terms are presented in this study. Several method and principles of metrics studies have been discussed. Finally paper concluded that the main research areas of each stage concentrated on the major topic like citation analysis has been a core research area during every stage; research interest has shifted from theoretical research to applied aspect; visualization methods and scientific mapping have attracted more and more attention and will become a main research area of scientometrics. The inclusion of webometrics expands the field of bibliometrics, as webometrics inevitably will contribute to further methodological developments of web-specific approaches and knowledgometrics adds new concept to the field.

Keywords

Bibliometrics, Scientometrics, Knowledgometrics.
User
Notifications
Font Size

  • Almind, T. C., & Ingwersen, P. (1997). Informetric analyses on the world wide web: methodological approaches to ‘webometrics’. Journal of documentation, 53(4), 404-426.

  • Bjorneborn, L., & Ingwersen, P. (2004). Toward a basic framework for webometrics. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 55(14), 1216-1227.

  • Bradford, S. C. (1934). Sources of information on specific subjects. Engineering, 137, 85-86.

  • Bookstein, A. (1976). The bibliometric distributions. The Library Quarterly, 46(4), 416-423.

  • Brookes, B. C. (1968). The derivation and application of the Bradford-Zipf distribution. Journal of Documentation. 24(4), 247-65.

  • Brookes, B. C. (1969a). The complete Bradford-Zipf bibliograph. Journal of Documentation, 25(1), 58.

  • Brookes, B. C. (1969b). Bradford’s law and the bibliography of science. Nature. 224; 953-6.

  • Brookes, B. C. (1970). Obsolescence of special library periodicals: sampling errors and utility contours. Journal of the American Society for Information Science. 21, 320-9.

  • Brookes, B. C. (1990). Biblio-, Scient-, Informetrics??? What are we talking about? In Legghe and R Rousseau (Eds.) Informetrics, 89/90, 31-43.

  • Cole, F. J., & Eales, N. B. (1917). The history of comparative anatomy: Part I.—A statistical analysis of the literature. Science Progress (1916-1919), 11(44), 578-596. Price, D. J. (1986). Little science, big science... and beyond (pp. 103-105). New York: Columbia University Press.

  • Dolrov, G. H., & Korennoi, A. A. (1969). The informational basis of scientometrics: on theoretical problems of informetrics. FID, 435, 165-191.

  • Egghe, L. (1990). The duality of informetric systems with applications to empirical laws. Journal of Information Science, 16(1), 17-27.

  • Firthorne, Robert A (1969). Empirical hyperbolic distributions (Bradford-Zipf Mondelbrot) for bibliometric description and prediction. Journal of Documentation, 25(4), 319-43.

  • Garfield, E. (1989). Essays of an Information Scientist: 1987(Vol. 1-2). ISI Press, Philadelphia.

  • Garfield, E. (1976). Highly cited articles. 26. Some classic papers of late 19th and early 20th centuries. (Current Comments. 21, 5-9).

  • Gosnell, C. F. (1943). The rate of obsolescence in college library book collections, as determined by an analysis of three select lists of books for college libraries (Doctoral dissertation, New York University, School of Education).

  • Gosnell, C. F. (1944). Obsolescence of books in college libraries. College and Research Libraries, 5. 115-125.

  • Gross, P. L., & Gross, E. M. (1927). College libraries and chemical education. Science, 66(1713), 385-389.

  • Hulme, E. W. (1923). Statistical bibliography in relation to the growth of modern civilization.

  • Junping, Q. (2017). Scientometrics: Theory. Methods and applications, Singapore, Springer.

  • Liu, Z., & Hongzhou, Z. (1999). Studies in Science of Science, 17(04), 104109. [In Chinese]

  • Lotka, A. J. (1926). The frequency distribution of scientific productivity. Journal of the Washington academy of sciences, 16(12), 317-323.

  • Mandelbrot, B. (1952). Information theory of the statistical structure of language. Proceedings of the Symposium on Application of Communication Theory, London, Se.1t 1952. Butterworth. 486-500).

  • Pritchard, A. (1969). Statistical bibliography or bibliometrics. Journal of documentation, 25(4), 348-349.

  • Rajan, T. N., & Sen, B. K. (1985). An essay on informetrics: a study in growth and development. In Proceedings of the IASLIC XV, Bangalore.

  • Ranganathan, S. R. (1969). Librametry and its scope. DRTC Annual Seminar, 7. Paper DA.

  • Rao, R., & Kedage, I. (1981). Document and user distribution in transaction records of Canadian University Libraries. London, Ontario (Doctoral dissertation, Doctoral Thesis, Faculty of Graduate Studies, University of Western Ontario. cited by: Ravichandra Rao, Inna Kedage).

  • Ravichandra Rao, I. K. (1993). Librametry to Informetrics: An overview and Ranganathan’s contribution. Libri, 40, 3.

  • Ravichandra Rao, I. K. (1996). Methodological and Conceptual Questions of Bibliometric Standards. Scientometrics. 35(2), 265-70.

  • Ravichandra Rao, I. K. (1983). Quantitative Methods for Library and Information Science. Wiley Eastern Limited. New Delhi.

  • Ravichandra Rao, I. K. (2010). Growth of literature and measures of scientific productivity: Scientometric models. New Delhi: Ess Ess Publications.

  • Sangam,S. L. (2015). Scientometrics: Quantitative methods for Library and information Science. Bangalore : ContentCrafts.

  • Thelwall, M. (2009). Introduction to webometrics: Quantitative web research for the social sciences. Synthesis lectures on information concepts, retrieval, and services, 1(1), 1-116.

  • Wittig, G. R. (1978). Documentation note: statistical bibliography—a historical footnote. Journal of Documentation, 34(3), 240-241.

  • Vickery, B. C. (1948). Bradford’s law of scattering. Journal of documentation, 4(3), 198-203.

  • Wittig, G. R. (1978). Documentation note: statistical bibliography—a historical footnote. Journal of Documentation, 34(3), 240-241.

  • Zhao, H. & Tang, J. (1999). The static charge of the element of knowledge and its expression in space [J]. Science of Science & Management of S&T, 11 (1): 37-41.

  • Zhao, Y., & Zhao, R. (2014). Evolution of the Development of Scientometrics. iConference 2014 Proceedings. (p. 905– 912).

  • Zipf, G. K. (1949). Human Behaviour and the Principle of Least Effort. An Introduction to Human Ecology, Hafner reprint, New York, 1972.


Abstract Views: 394

PDF Views: 0




  • Theory Method and Principle of Metrics Science

Abstract Views: 394  |  PDF Views: 0

Authors

S. L. Sangam
Department of Library and Information Science Karnatak University, Dharwad, India

Abstract


Measurement is an integral part of modern science. This paper proposed a comprehensive statistical overview of the terms librametrics, bibliometrics, scientometrics, informetrics, webometrics and knowledgometrics refer to fields related to the study of the dynamics of disciplines as reflected in the production of their literature. These terms are used to describe similar and overlapping methodologies. The origins, historical survey, scope, application and development of each of these terms are presented in this study. Several method and principles of metrics studies have been discussed. Finally paper concluded that the main research areas of each stage concentrated on the major topic like citation analysis has been a core research area during every stage; research interest has shifted from theoretical research to applied aspect; visualization methods and scientific mapping have attracted more and more attention and will become a main research area of scientometrics. The inclusion of webometrics expands the field of bibliometrics, as webometrics inevitably will contribute to further methodological developments of web-specific approaches and knowledgometrics adds new concept to the field.

Keywords


Bibliometrics, Scientometrics, Knowledgometrics.

References





DOI: https://doi.org/10.32344/jld%2Fv4%2Fi1%2F2018%2F1-18