Journal of Physics & Astronomy

Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription Access

Misunderstandings of Galileos Law-From Galileo to Einstein


Affiliations
1 Tertiary: Study of Technical Physics at “Technische Hochschule”, Technical University Munich, Germany
2 Research, Consulting and Software Engineering, Technical University Munich, Germany
 

The approximative only nature of Galileo’s “law” has already been evidenced sporadically in the past but its status of “universal law” continues unchallenged in scientific textbooks. The traded misinterpretation of Galileo’s “law” of Free Fall is based on the overseeing that the translational acceleration measured in the Galilean setup (referred to the earth centre) is in fact the vector sum of two Newtonian accelerations, namely that of the falling test body mass m and that of the earth mass M towards the common centre of the participating masses. It can be shown that it is a composite acceleration incremented with respect to the Newtonian acceleration by the factor (M+m)/M correcting the distortion from the “simplest form” caused by the offset of the reference frame. Galileo’s law is therefore only approximately true for terrestrial fall situations with m/M typically in the order of 10-24. Several causes are discussed in the current paper, which has contributed to the missed review of Galileo’s “law”, persisting up to day.

Keywords

Magnetic Field, London Penetration Depth, Josephson Penetration Depth, Sine-Gordon Equation, Parameters.
User
Notifications
Font Size

  • Lehavi Y, Galili I. The status of Galileo’s law of free-fall and its implications for physics education. APL Bioeng .2009;77(5):417-23.

  • Guicciardini N. Isaac newton. Philosophiae naturalis principia mathematica (1687). InLandmark Writings in Western Mathematics; Elsevier Science. 2005;59-87.

  • Cornu A, Baille JB. Mutual Determination of the Constant of Attraction and the Mean Density of the Earth. CR Acad Sci Paris.1873;76:954-8.

  • Euler L. Découverte d'un nouveau principe de mécanique. Mémoires de l'académie des sciences de Berlin. 1752:185-217.

  • R.B. Laughlin, A Different Universe - Reinventing Physics From the Bottom Down; Basic Books. 2005.

  • L.D. Landau, and E.M. Lifschiz, (1958) chapter 13, 3rd edition, English translation: Mechanics; Butterwork-Heinemann;Moscow. 1976.

  • Eötvös L. Über die Anziehung der Erde auf verschiedene Substanzen. Mathematische und naturwissenschaftliche Berichte aus Ungarn.1890;8:65-8.

  • Ch.W. Misner, K.S.Thorne, J.A.Wheeler, Gravitation; Freeman, 25th printing. 2003.

  • N. Cartwright, How The Laws of Physics Lie. Clarendon Press; Oxford. 1983.

  • Th. S. Kuhn, The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. University of Chicago Press; third edition. 1996.

  • A.Cornu and J. B. Baille. Mutual Determination of the Constant of Attraction and the Mean Density of the Earth. CR Acad. Sci. Paris. 1873;76:954-58.

  • A. Einstein, U¨ber die spezielle und die allgemeine Relativittstheorie; 24th ed.; Springer Spektrum; 2009.

  • Einstein, A. Relativity. The Special and the General Theory;10th edition:1920.


Abstract Views: 205

PDF Views: 1




  • Misunderstandings of Galileos Law-From Galileo to Einstein

Abstract Views: 205  |  PDF Views: 1

Authors

Vittorio Ferretti
Tertiary: Study of Technical Physics at “Technische Hochschule”, Technical University Munich, Germany
Georg F. Volkert
Research, Consulting and Software Engineering, Technical University Munich, Germany

Abstract


The approximative only nature of Galileo’s “law” has already been evidenced sporadically in the past but its status of “universal law” continues unchallenged in scientific textbooks. The traded misinterpretation of Galileo’s “law” of Free Fall is based on the overseeing that the translational acceleration measured in the Galilean setup (referred to the earth centre) is in fact the vector sum of two Newtonian accelerations, namely that of the falling test body mass m and that of the earth mass M towards the common centre of the participating masses. It can be shown that it is a composite acceleration incremented with respect to the Newtonian acceleration by the factor (M+m)/M correcting the distortion from the “simplest form” caused by the offset of the reference frame. Galileo’s law is therefore only approximately true for terrestrial fall situations with m/M typically in the order of 10-24. Several causes are discussed in the current paper, which has contributed to the missed review of Galileo’s “law”, persisting up to day.

Keywords


Magnetic Field, London Penetration Depth, Josephson Penetration Depth, Sine-Gordon Equation, Parameters.

References