Journal of Surface Science and Technology

Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription Access
Open Access Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Restricted Access Subscription Access

Interaction of a Cationic Surfactant with an Oppositely Charged Polymer


Affiliations
1 Centre for Surface Science, Department of Chemistry, Jadavpur University, Kolkata – 700032, West Bengal, India
2 Department of Chemistry, Alipurduar College, Alipurduar, India
3 Department of Chemistry, St. Francis Xavier University, Antigonish, Nova Scotia, B2G 2W5, Canada
     

   Subscribe/Renew Journal


The interactions between the cationic surfactant Dodecyltrimethylammonium Bromide (DTAB) and anionic polymer sodium carboxymethyl cellulose (Na-CMC) in aqueous medium were studied at 300K over different concentrations of Na-CMC by tensiometry, conductometry, viscometry, turbidimetry and fluorimetry. Aggregation of surfactant was attained in two steps, the first being the monomeric adsorption of surfactants on anionic sites of the polymer saturating at lower concentrations of surfactant and the second one being the formation of micelles by surfactants at higher concentrations. Mainly, two types of interactions prevailed throughout namely, electrostatic and hydrophobic interactions. Due to the variation of the interactions depending on the concentrations of polymer, there has been considerable differences in the behavioural pattern of the profiles for the lower concentrations of polymer compared to that of the upper ones.

Keywords

Anionic Polymer, Cationic Surfactant, Electrostatic Interaction, Hydrophobic Interaction, Micellization.
Subscription Login to verify subscription
User
Notifications
Font Size


  • S. Ghosh, J. Colloid Interface Sci., 244, 128 (2001).

  • D. Tikariha, K. K. Ghosh, P. Quagliotto and S. Ghosh, J. Chem. Eng. Data, 55, 4162 (2010).

  • S. Ghosh, A. Das Barman, G. C. De and A. R. Das, J. Phys. Chem. B, 115, 11098 (2011).

  • D. Tikariha, B. Kumar, S. Ghosh, A. K. Tiwari, S. K. Saha, N. Barbero, P. Quagliotto, and K. K. Ghosh, J. Nanofluids, 2, 316 (2013).

  • S. M. Saleem and A. Hernandez, J. Surf. Sci. Technol., 3, 1 (1987).

  • A. Bhattacharyya and J. F. Argillier, J. Surf. Sci. Technol., 21, 161 (2005).

  • D. Chandra and A. Bhaumik, Ind. Eng. Chem. Res., 45, 4879 (2006).

  • S. Ghosh and S. P. Moulik, Indian J. Chem. Sect. A, 38, 10 (1999).

  • S. Ghosh and S. P. Moulik, Indian J. Chem. Sect. A, 38, 201 (1999).

  • S. Ghosh and S. P. Moulik, J. Surf. Sci. Technol., 14, 110 (1998).

  • J. M. Landry, D. G. Marangoni, D. A. Arden, I. J. MacLennan and J. C. T. Kwak, J. Surfact. Deterg., 12, 155 (2009).

  • S. Ghosh, J. Surf. Sci. Technol., 19, 167 (2003).

  • J. M. Gohil, A. Bhattacharya and P. Roy, J. Surf. Sci. Technol., 20, 1 (2004).

  • D. Varade, R. Sharma, P. Majhi and P. Bahadur, J. Surf. Sci. Technol., 19, 85 (2003).

  • A. Rangaraj and A. K. Rakshit, J. Surf. Sci. Technol., 16, 246 (2000).

  • S. Chakraborty, A. K. Bera, S. Bhattacharya, S. Ghosh, A. K. Pal, S. Ghosh and A. Banerjee, J. Organomet. Chem., 645, 33 (2002).

  • M. Sadeghalvaad and S. Sabbaghi, J. Nanofluids, 4, 435 (2015).

  • L. S. Sundar, E. V. Ramana, M. K. Singh, J. Gracio and A. C. M. Sousa, J. Nanofluids, 3, 200 (2014).

  • A. Saxena and H. B. Bohidar, J. Surf. Sci. Technol., 13, 32 (1997).

  • S. Brojabasi and J. Philip, J. Nanofluids, 2, 237 (2013).

  • A. Nag, B. Sadhukhan and D. K. Chattoraj, J. Surf. Sci. Technol., 4, 91 (1988).

  • E. Staples, I. Tucker, J. Penfold, N. Warren, R. K. Thomas and D. J. F. Taylor, Langmuir, 18, 5147 (2002).

  • T. C. Singh, R. K. Nath, K. Manna and A. K. Panda, J. Surf. Sci. Technol., 29, 101 (2013).

  • M. Rodgers, C. Rodgers and R. M. Palepu, J. Surf. Sci. Technol., 20, 33 (2004).

  • Y. Kadam, K. Singh, D. G. Marangoni, J. H. Ma, V. K. Aswal and P. Bahadur, J. Colloid Interface Sci., 351, 449 (2010).

  • M. S. Kumar and H. N. Singh, J. Surf. Sci. Technol., 8, 381 (1992).

  • E. Halder, D. K. Chattoraj and K. P. Das, J. Surf. Sci. Technol., 19, 21 (2003).

  • A. A. McLachlan and D. G. Marangoni, Can. J. Chem., 88, 124 (2010).

  • T. C. Singh, S. Biswas, S. Dasgupta, A. Mitra, A. K. Panda and R. K. Nath, J. Surf. Sci. Technol., 24, 21 (2008).

  • T. Chakraborty. I. Chakraborty and S. Ghosh, Langmuir, 22, 9905 (2006).

  • S. Das, I. Mukherjee, B. K. Paul and S. Ghosh, Langmuir, 30, 12483 (2014).

  • S. Das, S. Mondal and S. Ghosh, RSC Advances, 6, 30795 (2016).

  • N. Jain, S. Trabelsi, S. Guillot, McLoughlin, D. Langevin, P. Letellior, M. Turmine, Langmuir, 20, 8496 (2004).

  • Y. Pi, Y. Shang, H. Liu, Y. Hu and J. Jiang, J. Colloid Interface Sci., 306, 405 (2007).

  • P. K. Jana, S. Bhattacharyya, S. Ghosh and P. Das, Int. J. Res. Chem. Environ. 5, 12 (2015).

  • E. K. Just and T. G. Majewicz, Encyclopedia of Polymer Science and Engineering, John Wiley and Sons, New York, 3, 226 (1985).

  • X. Wang, Y. Li, J. Li, J. Wang, Y. Wang, Z. Guo and H. Yan, J. Phys. Chem. B, 109, 10807 (2005).

  • S. Trabelsi, E. Raspand and D. Langevin, Langmuir, 23, 10053 (2007).


Abstract Views: 277

PDF Views: 4




  • Interaction of a Cationic Surfactant with an Oppositely Charged Polymer

Abstract Views: 277  |  PDF Views: 4

Authors

Soumen Ghosh
Centre for Surface Science, Department of Chemistry, Jadavpur University, Kolkata – 700032, West Bengal, India
Arpan Mal
Centre for Surface Science, Department of Chemistry, Jadavpur University, Kolkata – 700032, West Bengal, India
Tanushree Chakraborty
Centre for Surface Science, Department of Chemistry, Jadavpur University, Kolkata – 700032, West Bengal, India
Gobinda Chandra De
Department of Chemistry, Alipurduar College, Alipurduar, India
Daniel Gerrard Marangoni
Department of Chemistry, St. Francis Xavier University, Antigonish, Nova Scotia, B2G 2W5, Canada

Abstract


The interactions between the cationic surfactant Dodecyltrimethylammonium Bromide (DTAB) and anionic polymer sodium carboxymethyl cellulose (Na-CMC) in aqueous medium were studied at 300K over different concentrations of Na-CMC by tensiometry, conductometry, viscometry, turbidimetry and fluorimetry. Aggregation of surfactant was attained in two steps, the first being the monomeric adsorption of surfactants on anionic sites of the polymer saturating at lower concentrations of surfactant and the second one being the formation of micelles by surfactants at higher concentrations. Mainly, two types of interactions prevailed throughout namely, electrostatic and hydrophobic interactions. Due to the variation of the interactions depending on the concentrations of polymer, there has been considerable differences in the behavioural pattern of the profiles for the lower concentrations of polymer compared to that of the upper ones.

Keywords


Anionic Polymer, Cationic Surfactant, Electrostatic Interaction, Hydrophobic Interaction, Micellization.

References





DOI: https://doi.org/10.18311/jsst%2F2016%2F14746