Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription Access
Open Access Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Restricted Access Subscription Access

Comparing the Effect of Injecting Urea, NACL and Distilled Water on Emissions of Diesel Engine with After Treatment Devices


Affiliations
1 K. S. Institute of Technology, Bangalore, India
2 Sir M. Visvesvaraya Institute of Technology, Bangalore, India
3 Government Engineering College, Ramanagara, India
     

   Subscribe/Renew Journal


The experimental investigations on existing diesel engine adopted with two after treatment devices viz; Diesel particulate filters, Diesel oxidation catalyst with injection of fluids at the exhaust pipe were carried out. In the first part of the experimentation, only DPF and DOC were fixed; performance and emissions were measured at all the loads. Injecting fluid viz; urea solution, sodium chloride and distilled water separately at the exhaust pipe was second part of the experimentation keeping same DPF and DOC. From all the emission values, the optimum condition leading to least emission value is engine having both DPF and DOC and injecting urea solution at the exhaust pipe. Running the existing diesel engine with this suggested optimum condition would lead decremental of 79.3% in smoke, 41.1% in CO and 30.3% in NOx emissions.

Keywords

Diesel Engine, Urea Solution, Sodium Chloride, Diesel Particulate Filters, Diesel Oxidation Catalyst
User
Subscription Login to verify subscription
Notifications
Font Size

  • Bastman, M. (2017). Research of Exhaust Emission Control of Off-road Diesel Engine and Active Regeneration of Diesel Particulate Filter. Energy and Combustion Engine Technology, 1-70.
  • Chan, J. (2019). Tampering & Aftermarket Defeat Devices. Presentation at the Far West Equipment Dealers Association Conference, November 2019.
  • Dallmann, T., Posada, F., & Bandivadekar, A. (2018). Costs of Emission Reduction Technologies for Diesel Engines Used in Non-Road Vehicles and Equipment. Working paper 2018-10, International Council on Clean Transportation, 1-26.
  • Dunnuck, D. (2019). Enabling Technologies Diesel through hybrid. CES Research and Engineering.
  • Guo, M., Fua, Z., Maa, D., Jia, N., Songa, C., & Liua, Q. (2015). A Short Review of Treatment Methods of Marine Diesel Engine Exhaust Gases. 9th International Symposium on Heating, Ventilation and Air Conditioning (ISHVAC) and the 3rd International Conference on Building Energy and Environment (COBEE), Procedia Engineering, 121, 938 – 943.
  • Gupta, R., Gupta, P., Bhalla, J., & Moury, S. (2016). Performance Analysis of a Diesel Engine using the Soybean Oil based Biodiesel. Indian Journal of Science and Technology, 9(36), ISSN (Online):0974-5645.
  • Hayes, D. (2019). The Clean Vehicle Retrofit Guide. Zemo Partnership, 1-32.
  • Jun, Y. (2020). Experimental Investigation to analyze the Effects of Oil Dilution on Unintended Acceleration in A Diesel Engine. International Journal of Automotive Technology, 21(5), 1077-1087.
  • Johnson, T. V. (2011). Diesel Emissions in Review. SAE International journal of engines, 4(1), 143-157.
  • Kair, M. (2006). After Diesel: Options for cleaner trucks, trains and ships. Southwest Research Institute, California.
  • Khalife, E., Tabatabaei, M., & Najafi, B. (2017). A novel emulsion fuel containing aqueous nano cerium oxide additive in diesel–biodiesel blends to improve diesel engines performance and reduce exhaust emissions: Part I – Experimental analysis. Fuel, 207, 741-750.
  • Khond, V. W., & Kriplani, V. M. (2016). Effect of nanofluid additives on performances and emissions of emulsified diesel and biodiesel fueled stationary CI engine: A comprehensive review. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 59, 1338-1348.
  • Lin, C-Y. (2013). Effects of Biodiesel Blend on Marine Fuel Characteristics for Marine Vessels. Energies, 6, 4945-4955.
  • Louis, C., Liu, Y., Tassel, P., Perret, P., Chaumond, A. and André, M. (2016). PAH, BTEX, carbonyl compound, black-carbon, NO2 and ultrafine particle dynamometer bench emissions for Euro 4 and Euro 5 diesel and gasoline passenger cars. Atmospheric Environment, 141, 80-95.
  • Mehregan, M., and Moghiman, M. (2018). Effects of nano-additives on pollutants emission and engine performance in a urea-SCR equipped diesel engine fueled with blended-biodiesel. Fuel, 222, 402-406.
  • National Institute of Automotive Service Excellence (ASE) (2020). Medium/Heavy Composite Vehicle Type 4 Reference Booklet. http://www.ase.com/uploads/L2CV4_2021_210112_141626.pdf
  • Ogren, R. Y., and Kong, S-C. (2018). Ultra-High Fuel Injection Pressure with Massive EGR to Enable Simultaneous Reduction of Soot and NOx Emissions. SAE 2018-01-0227.
  • Pandey, A. K., Nandgaonkar, M., Suresh, S., and Pandey, U. (2018). Comparison and Evaluation of performance, Combustion, NOx reduction and Nano particle emission of Diesel, Jatropha and Karanja oil Methyl Ester Biodiesel in a Military 38.8L CIDI Engine Applying EGR with Turbo Charging. SAE 2018-01-0919.
  • Perez, J.M. (2018). Measurement of unregulated emissions: Some heavy duty diesel engine results. Environment International, 5(4–6), 217-228.
  • Prabakaran, B. (2018). Utilization of diesel- ethanol blends in CI engine as a fuel with nano alumina as combustion enhancer. SAE 2018-28-0010.
  • Rimkus, A., Matijošius, J., Bogdevičius, M., Bereczky, A., and Török, A. (2018). An investigation of the efficiency of using O2 and H2(hydrooxile gas -HHO) gas additives in a ci engine operating on diesel fuel and biodiesel. Energy, 152, 640-651.
  • Shah, P. R., and Ganesh, A. (2018). A novel strategy of periodic dosing of soy-lecithin as additive during long term test of diesel engine fueled with straight vegetable oil. Fuel, 228, 405-417.
  • Seesy, A., Hassan, H., and Ookawara, S. (2018). Effects of graphene nanoplatelet addition to jatropha Biodiesel–Diesel mixture on the performance and emission characteristics of a diesel engine. Energy, 147, 1129-1152.
  • Singh, P and Chauhan, V. S. R. (2016). Carbonyl and aromatic hydrocarbon emissions from diesel engine exhaust using different feedstock: A review. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 63, 269-291.
  • Soltic, P., Hilfiker, T., Hänggi, S. (2019). Efficient light duty engine using turbulent jet ignition of lean methane mixtures. International Journal of Engine Research, 1-11. https://doi.org/10.1177/1468087419889833
  • Trevisan, A. (2016). Challenges and opportunities for stage V NRMM. SAE NAPLES Conference After treatment System for Diesel Engines.
  • Trivedi, S., and Ram Prasad (2018). A four-way catalytic system for control of emissions from diesel engine. Sadhana, 43(8), 130.
  • Wakale, A. B., Mohamed, S. Y., Naser, N., Ali, M. J. M., Banerjee, R., Hong Im & Sarathy, S. M. (2018). An Experimental and Numerical Study of N-Dodecane/Butanol blends for compression ignition engines. SAE 2018-01-0240.
  • Wei, H., Yao, C., Dou, Z., & Wang, B. (2017). Comparison of the conversion efficiency of DOC and DPOC to unregulated emissions from a DMDF engine. Fuel, 204, 71-84.
  • Xiao, H., Zeng, P., Li, Z., Zhao, L., & Fu, X. (2016). Combustion performance and emissions of 2-methylfuran diesel blends in a diesel engine. Fuel, 5, 157-163.
  • Yang, Y-X., Tan, B-Q., Liu, C-W., Zhang, P., Le, Q-J., & Zhang, B-X. (2019). A T3 metering theory used for diesel exhaust fluid dosing and failure diagnosis in selective catalyst reduction dosing systems. Journal of Zhejiang University-Science A (Applied Physics & Engineering), 20(5), 334-346.
  • Zhu, R., Cheung, C. S., Huang, Z., & Wang, X. (2011). Regulated and unregulated emissions from a diesel engine fuelled with diesel fuel blended with diethyl adipate. Atmospheric Environment, 45(13), 2174-2181.

Abstract Views: 251

PDF Views: 0




  • Comparing the Effect of Injecting Urea, NACL and Distilled Water on Emissions of Diesel Engine with After Treatment Devices

Abstract Views: 251  |  PDF Views: 0

Authors

K. S. Nagaprasad
K. S. Institute of Technology, Bangalore, India
S. Shivakumar
Sir M. Visvesvaraya Institute of Technology, Bangalore, India
D. Madhu
Government Engineering College, Ramanagara, India

Abstract


The experimental investigations on existing diesel engine adopted with two after treatment devices viz; Diesel particulate filters, Diesel oxidation catalyst with injection of fluids at the exhaust pipe were carried out. In the first part of the experimentation, only DPF and DOC were fixed; performance and emissions were measured at all the loads. Injecting fluid viz; urea solution, sodium chloride and distilled water separately at the exhaust pipe was second part of the experimentation keeping same DPF and DOC. From all the emission values, the optimum condition leading to least emission value is engine having both DPF and DOC and injecting urea solution at the exhaust pipe. Running the existing diesel engine with this suggested optimum condition would lead decremental of 79.3% in smoke, 41.1% in CO and 30.3% in NOx emissions.

Keywords


Diesel Engine, Urea Solution, Sodium Chloride, Diesel Particulate Filters, Diesel Oxidation Catalyst

References