![Open Access](https://i-scholar.in/lib/pkp/templates/images/icons/fulltextgreen.png)
![Restricted Access](https://i-scholar.in/lib/pkp/templates/images/icons/fulltextred.png)
Impact of Control Section and Pollution Source Generalization on Calculation of Water Environment Capacity
Based on the one-dimensional water quality modelling theory, this paper discusses the impact of different calculation methods on water environment capacity in different water functional areas. Through a case study of the Yinma River in Jilin province, in the same condition, the influence of four calculation methods (1. section-beginning control and no pollution sources generalization; 2. section-beginning control and uniform pollution sources generalization; 3. section-end control and no pollution sources generalization; 4. section-end control and uniform pollution sources generalization) on the calculated results of water environment capacity were analysed. The calculation results of four calculation methods from big to small are: 4,3,2,1. In the case of considering only one of the model parameters, control section or pollution source generalization, the percentage improvements of water environment capacity are the same.
Keywords
Water Functional Area, Water Environment Capacity, Control Section, Pollution Sources.
User
Font Size
Information
- Fang, Xiaobo, Zhang, Jianying, Chen, Wei, Xu, Xiangyang and Chen, Yingxu 2007. Assimilative capacity of the Qiantang River watershed based on a QUAL2K model. Journal of Environmental Sciences, 27(8): 1402-1407.
- GB25173-2010. Code of Practice for Computation on Allowable Permitted Assimilative Capacity of Water Bodies.
- Han, Long-xi, Zhu, Dang-sheng and Jiang, Li-hua 2002. Methods for calculation of water environment capacity of small and medium river channels. Journal of Hohai University, 30(1): 35-38.
- Hou, Bing-jiang and Li, Xiao-tao 2008. Study on allowable assimilative ability for pollution and quantity control of pollution discharge at present in Heilongjiang Province. Journal of Heilongjiang Hydraulic Engineering College, 35(1): 74-77.
- Lao, Gou-ming 2009. Impact of pollution source generalization on computation of pollution carrying capacity in 1-D model. Zhejiang Hydrotechnics, (5): 8-10.
- Li, Hong-liang and Li, Wei-ti 2006. Methods for calculation of water pollutant capacity and application. South-to-North Water Transfers and Water Science & Technology, 4: 58-60,97
- Liu, Hai, Qi, Wenbiao, Yu, Dewan and Xie, Xinmin 2013. Study on ecological operation in Yinmahe River basin. Journal of China Hydrology, 33(6): 35-41.
- Liu, Wei, Liu, Honk-chao and Xu, Hai-yan 2009. Calculation method of water environment capacity for water function area based on MIKE 11 model. Water Resources & Hydropower of Northeast, (8): 69-70.
- Lu, Yu and Su, Bao-lin 2011. Comparison of water environment capacity calculation methods for a river system. Water Resources Protection, 27(4): 5-9,47.
- Xu, Zhong xiang, Sun, Jianfu, Zhang, Xianzhong, Zhang, Peiqin and Fang, Yanzhen 2011. Application of water quality model WASP in assimilative capacity of Lan River. Northern Environment, 23(10): 30-33,36.
- Zhang, Xiu-ju, Yang, Kai, Cai, Ai-fang and Zhang, Qin-ling 2012. Influence of uncertainty parameters on assimilative capacity of water body. China Rural Water and Hydropower, (1): 13-17.
- Zhou, Gang, Kun, L., Guo, F. U., and Guang-jun, M. 2014. Calculation method of river water environmental capacity. Journal of Hydraulic Engineering, 45(2): 227-234,242.
- Zhou, Xiao-de, Guo, J.L., Cheng, W., Song, C., and Cao, G. 1999. The Comparison of the environmental capacity calculation methods. Journal of Xi’an University of Technology, 15(3): 1-6.
![](https://i-scholar.in/public/site/images/abstractview.png)
Abstract Views: 161
![](https://i-scholar.in/public/site/images/pdfview.png)
PDF Views: 0