Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription Access

Experimental Studies on Use of Polypropylene Material (Emptied Cement Bags) in Soils-An Alternative to Geosynthetics


Affiliations
1 Department of Civil Engineering, Kakatiya Institute of Technology and Science, Warangal, Telangana State, India
 

On many situations, industrial and infrastructural projects are constructed on soft and weak soil of low bearing capacity. Under these circumstances, the geotechnical engineers normally opt for a suitable ground improvement technique, to improve bearing capacity and reduce settlements. In these situations, reinforced soil has become a viable and cost-effective technique and use of geosynthetics has been proven to be another alternative. But, the use of geosynthetics is not cost effective. Geosynthetics improves the tensile strength of the soil and as a replacement to it, low cost emptied cement bags (made out of polymeric materials) can be used. Improved bearing capacity can be expected when emptied cement bags are used as the reinforcement to the soils. In this paper deteriorated emptied cement bag fibres are used as a stabilizing material to improve the soil characteristics of the cohesive and cohesionless soils. An experimental programme is presented to explore the beneficial aspects of emptied cement bags which is used for stabilizing soils. It is found that this stabilizing technique has improved the cohesion and angle of internal friction in case of cohesionless soils and increased the unconfined compressive strength to a noticeable extent in case of cohesive soils.

Keywords

Stabilization, Reinforcement, Cement Bags, Geotextiles, Polypropylene.
User
Notifications
Font Size


  • Alexiew, D., Brokemper, D. and Lothspeich, S. 2005. Geotextile encased columns (GEC): load capacity, geotextile selection and pre-design graphs. In: Contemporary Issues in Foundation Engineering, pp. 1-14.
  • ASTM Standard D4595-05 2004. Standard test method for tensile properties of geotextiles by the wide-width strip method. Annual Book of ASTM Standards, ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA.
  • Black, J.A., Sivakumar, V., Madhav, M.R. and Hamill, G.A. 2007. Reinforced stone columns in weak deposits: Laboratory model study. J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng., 133(9): 1154-1161.
  • Deb, K. and Badasaheb Namdeo, J. 2011. Laboratory model studies on unreinforced and geogrid reinforced sand bed over stone column improved soft clay. Geotextiles and Geomembranes, 29(2): 190-196.
  • Narasimha Rao, A.N. and Neerja, D. 2012. Influence of geofabric in the construction of pavements of expansive clayey subgrades. International Journal of Advances in Engineering and Technology, 3: 487-493.
  • Md. Shakeel, Abid and Nitesh Goli 2015. Stress analysis of reinforced embankments. IGC Pune, Maharashtra.
  • Islam, M.S. and Ahmed, S.K. 2012. Impact of jute on environment. Journal of Environment and Earth Science, 2(5): 24-31.
  • Murugesan, S. and Rajagopal, K. 2007. Model tests on geosynthetic encased stone columns. Geosynthetics International, 14(6): 346-354.
  • Singh, H.P. 2013. Strength and stiffness of soil reinforced with jute geotextile sheets. International Journal of Current Engineering and Technology, 3: 1143-1146.

Abstract Views: 467

PDF Views: 0




  • Experimental Studies on Use of Polypropylene Material (Emptied Cement Bags) in Soils-An Alternative to Geosynthetics

Abstract Views: 467  |  PDF Views: 0

Authors

Shakeel Abid
Department of Civil Engineering, Kakatiya Institute of Technology and Science, Warangal, Telangana State, India
M. Andal
Department of Civil Engineering, Kakatiya Institute of Technology and Science, Warangal, Telangana State, India

Abstract


On many situations, industrial and infrastructural projects are constructed on soft and weak soil of low bearing capacity. Under these circumstances, the geotechnical engineers normally opt for a suitable ground improvement technique, to improve bearing capacity and reduce settlements. In these situations, reinforced soil has become a viable and cost-effective technique and use of geosynthetics has been proven to be another alternative. But, the use of geosynthetics is not cost effective. Geosynthetics improves the tensile strength of the soil and as a replacement to it, low cost emptied cement bags (made out of polymeric materials) can be used. Improved bearing capacity can be expected when emptied cement bags are used as the reinforcement to the soils. In this paper deteriorated emptied cement bag fibres are used as a stabilizing material to improve the soil characteristics of the cohesive and cohesionless soils. An experimental programme is presented to explore the beneficial aspects of emptied cement bags which is used for stabilizing soils. It is found that this stabilizing technique has improved the cohesion and angle of internal friction in case of cohesionless soils and increased the unconfined compressive strength to a noticeable extent in case of cohesive soils.

Keywords


Stabilization, Reinforcement, Cement Bags, Geotextiles, Polypropylene.

References