Parikalpana: KIIT Journal of Management

Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription Access

Employee and Work Engagement: An Answer to The Problems of The Handloom Industry in India


Affiliations
1 Department of Business Management, H.N.B Garhwal University, Srinagar (A Central University), India
2 Research Scholar, Department of Business Management, H.N.B Garhwal University, Srinagar
3 Research Scholar, Department of Business Management, H.N.B Garhwal University, Srinagar, India
 

Handloom has been a vintage industry. Its ischolar_mains can be dated back to the early stages of human civilization. Over time thehandloom sectorhas endured various challenges and setbacks. Some of the major challenges faced have been due to the advancement of technological know-how and mechanizing of the production process. Lack of modernization, migration of workers to other fields have been some of the other problems faced by this industry. All these problems have left a huge impact on the workforce or employees engaged in this industry and hence the problems have become graver. On the other hand, employee engagement and work engagement, in particular, have been recognized to influence the work performance of the employees as well as the overall performance of the organization. With this paper, we will try and understand how work engagement and employee engagement can aid the handloom industry to tackle its problems.

Keywords

Employee Engagement, Work Engagement, Organizational Performance, Handloom Industry, Textile Industry.
User
Notifications
Font Size

  • Anitha, J. (2014). Determinants of employee engagement and their impact on employee performance. International journal of productivity and performance management.

  • Amabile, T. M. (1996). Creativity in context: Update to “the social psychology of creativity”. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.

  • Arshi, T., & Rao, V. (2019). Assessing impact of employee engagement on innovation and the mediating role of readiness for innovation. International Journal of Comparative Management, 2(2), 174-202.

  • Attridge, M. (2009). Measuring and managing employee work engagement: A review of the research and business literature. Journal of Workplace Behavioral Health, 24(4), 383-398.

  • Bag, M., & Behera, B. Problem and Prospects of Handloom Sector in Western Odisha.

  • Bakker, A. B., Albrecht, S. L., & Leiter, M. P. (2011). Work engagement: Further reflections on the state of play. European journal of work and organizational psychology, 20(1), 74-88.

  • Bhagavatula, S., Elfring, T., Van Tilburg, A., & Van De Bunt, G. G. (2010). How social and human capital influence opportunity recognition and resource mobilization in India’s handloom industry. Journal of Business Venturing, 25(3), 245-260.

  • Bortamuly, A. B., Goswami, K., Hazarika, B., &Handique, K. (2014). Do different determinants affect differently across gender and location in handloom entrepreneurship development?. Journal of Small Business & Entrepreneurship, 27(5), 427-449.

  • Bujacz, A., Bernhard-Oettel, C., Rigotti, T., &Lindfors, P. (2017). Task-level work engagement of self- employed and organizationally employed high-skilled workers. Career Development International.

  • De Jong, J., & Den Hartog, D. N. (2007). How leaders influence employees’ innovative behaviour. European Journal of Innovation Management, 10(1), 41–64.

  • Gunti Amaravathi, K. Bhavana Raj (2019). Indian Handloom Sector – A Glimpse. International Journal of Innovative Technology and Exploring Engineering, 2278-3075

  • Holbeche, L. and Springett, N. (2003), In Search of Meaning in the Workplace, Horsham, Roffey Park Institute, ISBN: 0907416527.

  • Javed, B., Khan, A. K., &Quratulain, S. (2018). Inclusive leadership and innovative work behavior: examination of LMX perspective in small capitalized textile firms. The Journal of psychology, 152(8), 594-612.

  • Kahn, W. A. (1990). Psychological conditions of personal engagement and disengagement at work. Academy of management journal, 33(4), 692-724.

  • Kane-Frieder, R. E., Hochwarter, W. A., & Ferris, G. R. (2014). Terms of engagement: Political boundaries of work engagement–work outcomes relationships. Human Relations, 67(3), 357-382.

  • Kim, W., Kolb, J. A., & Kim, T. (2013). The relationship between work engagement and performance: A review of empirical literature and a proposed research agenda. Human Resource Development Review, 12(3), 248-276.

  • Kwon, K., & Kim, T. (2020). An integrative literature review of employee engagement and innovative behavior: Revisiting the JD-R model. Human Resource Management Review, 30(2), 100704.

  • Laguna, M., Razmus, W., &Żaliński, A. (2017). Dynamic relationships between personal resources and work engagement in entrepreneurs. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 90(2), 248-269.

  • Macey, W. H., & Schneider, B. (2008). The meaning of employee engagement. Industrial and organizational Psychology, 1(1), 3-30.

  • Markos, S., & Sridevi, M. S. (2010). Employee engagement: The key to improving performance. International journal of business and management, 5(12), 89.

  • Ministery of Textile Annual report 2002-2003, Chapter V Handloom Industry. Retrieved from http://ministryoftextiles.gov.in/pdf/AR05-06-05.pdf

  • Ministery of Textile Annual Report 2019-20. Retrieved from http://texmin.nic.in/documents/annual-report

  • Parker, S. K., & Griffin, M. A. (2011). Understanding active psychological states: Embedding engagement in a wider nomological net and closer attention to performance. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 20(1), 60-67.

  • Pattnaik, S. C., & Sahoo, R. (2020). Employee engagement, creativity and task performance: role of perceived workplace autonomy. South Asian Journal of Business Studies.

  • Rich, B. L., Lepine, J. A., & Crawford, E. R. (2010). Job engagement: Antecedents and effects on job performance. Academy of management journal, 53(3), 617-635.

  • Saks, A. M. (2006). Antecedents and consequences of employee engagement. Journal of managerial psychology.

  • SANKARAKUMAR, R. AN ANALYSIS OF INDIAN HANDLOOM INDUSTRY-STATISTICAL SURVEY.

  • Schaufeli, W. B., Bakker, A. B., &Salanova, M. (2006). The measurement of work engagement with a short questionnaire: A cross-national study. Educational and psychological measurement, 66(4), 701-716.

  • Sekhar, C., Patwardhan, M., & Vyas, V. (2018). Linking work engagement to job performance through flexible human resource management. Advances in Developing Human Resources, 20(1), 72-87.

  • Simpson, M. R. (2009). Engagement at work: A review of the literature. International journal of nursing studies, 46(7), 1012-1024.

  • Sorenson, S. (2013). How employee engagement drives growth. Gallup business journal, 1, 1-4.

  • Soundarapandian, M. (2002). Growth and prospects of handloom sector in India. National Bank for Agriculture and Rural Development.

  • Tanusree, S. (2015). A study of the present situation of the traditional handloom weavers of Varanasi, Uttar Pradesh, India. International Research Journal of Social Sciences, 4(3), 48-53. The Reservation of Articles for Production Act, 1985.

  • Tierney, P., & Farmer, S. M. (2002). Creative self-efficacy: Its potential antecedents and relationship to creative performance. Academy of Management Journal, 45(6), 1137–1148.

  • Truss, C., Shantz, A., Soane, E., Alfes, K., &Delbridge, R. (2013). Employee engagement, organisational performance and individual well-being: exploring the evidence, developing the theory.

  • Zhang, Z., Wang, M., & Shi, J. (2012). Leader-follower congruence in proactive personality andwork outcomes: The mediating role of leader-member exchange. Academy of ManagementJournal, 55(1), 111–130.

  • Zondo, R. W. (2020). The influence of employee engagement on labour productivity in an automotive assembly organisation in South Africa. South African Journal of Economic and Management Sciences, 23(1), 1-9.


Abstract Views: 398

PDF Views: 0




  • Employee and Work Engagement: An Answer to The Problems of The Handloom Industry in India

Abstract Views: 398  |  PDF Views: 0

Authors

Surendra Kumar
Department of Business Management, H.N.B Garhwal University, Srinagar (A Central University), India
Sneha Maindola
Research Scholar, Department of Business Management, H.N.B Garhwal University, Srinagar
Manoj Rawat
Research Scholar, Department of Business Management, H.N.B Garhwal University, Srinagar, India

Abstract


Handloom has been a vintage industry. Its ischolar_mains can be dated back to the early stages of human civilization. Over time thehandloom sectorhas endured various challenges and setbacks. Some of the major challenges faced have been due to the advancement of technological know-how and mechanizing of the production process. Lack of modernization, migration of workers to other fields have been some of the other problems faced by this industry. All these problems have left a huge impact on the workforce or employees engaged in this industry and hence the problems have become graver. On the other hand, employee engagement and work engagement, in particular, have been recognized to influence the work performance of the employees as well as the overall performance of the organization. With this paper, we will try and understand how work engagement and employee engagement can aid the handloom industry to tackle its problems.

Keywords


Employee Engagement, Work Engagement, Organizational Performance, Handloom Industry, Textile Industry.

References





DOI: https://doi.org/10.23862/kiit-parikalpana%2F2021%2Fv17%2Fi1%2F209026