![Open Access](https://i-scholar.in/lib/pkp/templates/images/icons/fulltextgreen.png)
![Restricted Access](https://i-scholar.in/lib/pkp/templates/images/icons/fulltextred.png)
Diagnosing The Conditional Dependence Between Returns And Risk With Vector Autoregressive Model During Covid Crisis
Introduction: This paper proposed two separate tests for checking the conditional dependence between returns and risk of selected securities using Vector Autoregressive (VAR) model. Methodology: The proposed first test is based on Special Wald’s F-statistic. This test was employed in order to check whether the expected returns conditionally depend on risk and past year returns if the returns follow normal distribution. Similarly, in order to scrutinize the conditional dependence of risk on return and past years risk, the second test based on Lagrange’s multiplier (LM) statistic was employed. The methodology consists to model the data over the security returns of selected 5 companies under FMCG Industry listed in National Stock Exchange (NSE), India over the period between Jan 1, 2020 to Dec 31, 2020. Results: From the result of the study, it is revealed that even though the stock liquidity of Britannia and Marico is good, their expected returns reveals that this was not a deciding factor on their past year risk and return during the period of the study. And also Nestle and ITC proved to be their risk has an influence over their past risk and past returns.
Keywords
returns, risk, conditional dependence, autoregression, vector autoregression, heteroscedasticity, Special Wald test, Lagrange’s multiplier test
User
Font Size
Information
- Ahalawat, S., & Patro, A. (2019). Exchange rate and Chinese financial market: Variance decomposition under vector autoregression approach. Cogent Economics & Finance, 7(1).
- Balcilar, M., Thompson, K., Gupta, R., & Van Eyden, R. (2016). Testing the asymmetric effects of financial conditions in South Africa: A nonlinear vector autoregression approach. Journal of International Financial Markets, Institutions and Money, 43, 30-43.
- Christopoulos, D. K., & Tsionas, E. G. (2004). Financial development and economic growth: evidence from panel unit root and cointegration tests. Journal of development Economics, 73(1), 55-74.
- Kalliovirta, L., Meitz, M., & Saikkonen, P. (2016). Gaussian mixture vector autoregression. Journal of Econometrics, 192(2), 485-498.
- Le, N. D., Martin, R. D., & Raftery, A. E. (1996). Modeling flat stretches, bursts outliers in time series using mixture transition distribution models. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 91(436), 1504-1515.
- Luintel, K. B., & Khan, M. (1999). A quantitative reassessment of the finance–growth nexus: evidence from a multivariate VAR. Journal of development economics, 60(2), 381-405.
- Nielsen, H. B., & Rahbek, A. (2014). Unit root vector autoregression with volatility induced stationarity. Journal of Empirical Finance, 29, 144-167.
- Phillips, P. C. (1995). Fully modified least squares and vector autoregression. Econometrica: Journal of the Econometric Society, 1023-1078.
- Subudhi, R.N. (2019), “Testing of Hypothesis: Concepts and Applications”, Subudhi, R.N. and Mishra, S. (Ed.) Methodological Issues in Management Research: Advances, Challenges, and the Way Ahead, Emerald Publishing Limited, Bingley, pp. 127-143. https://doi.org/10.1108/978-1-78973-973-220191009
- Wong, C. S., & Li, W. K. (2000). On a mixture autoregressive model. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series B (Statistical Methodology), 62(1), 95-115.
![](https://i-scholar.in/public/site/images/abstractview.png)
Abstract Views: 200
![](https://i-scholar.in/public/site/images/pdfview.png)
PDF Views: 0