Parikalpana: KIIT Journal of Management

Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription Access

Examining Social Media Usage, Brand Image and E-WOM (Quantity, Quality and Credibility) as Determinants of Purchase Intention


Affiliations
1 Research Scholar, Bharati Vidyapeeth (Deemed to be university) Institute of Management and Research New Delhi, India
2 Professor, Jagannath International Management School, Kalkaji New Delhi, India
 

Social media took over the world in no time and proved to be a game changer for better connectivity, shared information, global integration and consumption. On one hand consumers became more enthusiastic about their social media image, products or services they consumer and perception of influencers towards brand, on another brand managers became more proactive about what their consumers are putting and seeking out in this dynamic world of choices. The traditional factors influencing purchase intention become less relevant and the modern factors like social media, E-wom, global trends become more important to analyse. This study aims at identifying social media usage, brand image and E-WOM (quality, quantity and credibility) as the determinants of purchase intention. The research is causal and descriptive in nature. For data collection, self-administered questionnaire was developed and data collection was via convenient sampling method. To check the reliability and data validity, exploratory factor analysis and confirmatory factor analysis was run using SPSS and AMOS.

Keywords

Social Media Usage, E-WOM, E-WOM Quantity, E-WOM Quality, E-WOM Credibility, Brand Image, Purchase Intention
User
Notifications
Font Size

  • A. S., Dick, and K. Basu, Customer loyalty: Toward an integrated conceptual framework. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, Vol. 22, No. Spring, pp. 99í113. (1994).

  • F., Wangenheim, and T. Bayon, Satisfaction, loyalty and word of mouth within the customer base of a utility provider Differences between stayers, switchers and referral switchers. Journal of Consumer Behavior, Vol. 3, No. 3, pp. 211í220. (2004).

  • P. F. Bone, Word-of-mouth effects on short-term and long-term product judgments. Journal of Business Research, Vol. 32, pp. 213í223. (1995).

  • R., Neelamegham, and D. Jain, Consumer choice process for experience goods: An econometric model and analysis. Journal of Marketing Research, Vol. 36, No. 3, pp. 373–386. (1999).

  • Aaker, D. (1996). Building strong brands. New York: Free Press.

  • Ajzen, I. Fishbein, M. “Attitudes And Normative Beliefs As Factors Influencing Behavioral Intentions”, Journal Of Personality And Social Psychology, (1972).

  • Amen, R.L., Agot Jr., W.C., Rosauro, O.R. and Gamas, M.A. (2017). Finding the hidden dimension of global internet usage through fractal analysis. NMSCST Research Journal, Vol. 3, No. 1, pp.87–95.

  • Arnaud De Bruyn, Gary L. Lilien. “A multi-stage model of word-ofmouth influence through viral marketing”, [J]. International Journal of Research in Marketing, 2008, 25(3):151-163.

  • Avery, C., Resnick, P. and Zeckhauser, R. (1999). The market for evaluations. American Economic Review, Vol. 89, No.3, pp. 564 584.

  • Bataineh, Abdallah Q. “The Impact Of Perceived E-WOM On Purchase Intention”, The Mediating Role Of Corporate Image, International Journal Of Marketing Studies 7.1 (2015), 126.

  • Berger, J., Sorensen, A. T., & Rasmussen, S. J. (2010). Positive effects of negative publicity: When negative reviews increase sales. Marketing Science, 29 (5), 815-827.

  • Bhatnagar, Amit and Sanjoy Ghose. “Online information search termination patterns across product categories and consumer demographics” , Journal of Retailing, 2004, 80 (3): 221–228.

  • Bhattacherjee A. A. S, “Influence Process For Information Technology Acceptance An Elaboration Likelihood Model”, MIS Quarterly, 2006, 30(4), 805-825.

  • Bhattacherjee, A. A. S. (2006). Influence Process For Information Technology Acceptance An Elaboration Likelihood Model. MIS Quarterly, 30(4), 805- 825.

  • Bickart, B., & Schindler, R.M. (2001). Internet forums as influential sources of consumer information. Journalof Interactive Marketing, 15 (3), 31-40

  • Brown, J., Broderick, A.J., & Lee, N. (2007). Word of mouth communication within online communities: Conceptualizing the online social network. Journal of Interactive Marketing, 21 (3), 2-20.

  • Charo, N., Sharma, P., Shaikh, S., Haseeb, A. and Sufya, M. Z. (2015). Determining the impact of E-WOM on brand image and purchase intention through adoption of online opinions. International Journal of Humanities and Management Sciences, 3 (1), 41-46.

  • Cheung, C. M. K. & Thadani, D. R. 2012. The Impact of Electronic Word-of-Mouth Communication: A Literature Analysis and Integrative Model. Decision Support Systems, 54, 461–470.

  • Chevalier J, Mayzlind D. “The effect of word of mouth on sales: online book reviews” , [J]. Journal of Marketing Research, 2006, 43(3): 345- 354.

  • Chikandiwa, S. T., Contogiannis, E., &Jembere, E. (2013). The adoption of social media marketing in South African banks. European business review.

  • Erkan, I. and Evans, C. (2016). The influence of E-WOM in social media on consumers’ purchase intentions: an extended approach to information adoption. Computers in Human Behavior, Vol. 61, pp.47–55.

  • Eun-JuSeo and Jin-Woo Park, 2018, A Study on the Influence of the Information Characteristics of Airline Social Media on e-WOM, Brand Equity and Trust, The Open Transportation Journal, 2018, Volume 12, 289-300.

  • Filieri, R. and McLeay, F. (2014), “E-WOM and accommodation: an analysis of the factors that influence travelers’ adoption of information from online reviews”, Journal of Travel Research, Vol. 53 No. 1, pp. 44-57.

  • Gupta, P., & Kaushik, N. (2018). Dimensions of service quality in higher education - critical review (students’ perspective). International Journal of Educational Management.

  • Hajli, N. (2014), “A study of the impact of social media on consumers”, International Journal of Market Research, Vol. 56 No. 3, pp. 387-404.

  • Hennig-Thurau, T., and Walsh, G. “Electronic word-of-mouth: motives for and consequences of reading customer articulations on the internet”, [J]. International Journal of Electronic Commerce, 2003, 8（2）:51-74.

  • Hennig-Thurau, T., Gwinner, K.P., Walsh, G. &Gremler, D.D. (2004). Electronic word-of-mouth via consumer opinion platforms: What motivates consumers to articulate themselves on the Internet?, Journal of Interactive Marketing, 18 (1), 38-52.

  • Hilligoss. B, Rieh S.Y, “Developing A Unifying Framework Of Credibility Assessment Construct Heuristics And Interaction In Context”. Information Processing And Management, 2007, 44(4), 1467-1484.

  • J. G., Maxham, and R. G. Netemeyer, A longitudinal study of complaining customers’ evaluations of multiple service failures and recovery efforts. Journal of Marketing, Vol. 66, No. 4, pp. 57í71. (2002).

  • Jalilvand, M.R. & Samiei, N. (2012). The effect of electronic word of mouth on brand image and purchase intention. Marketing Intelligence & Planning, 30 (4), 460-476.

  • Jin, S.A. and Phua, J. (2014). Following celebrities’ Tweets about brands: the impact of Twitter-based electronic word-of-mouth on consumers’ source credibility perception, buying intention and social identification with celebrities. Journal of Advertising, Vol. 43, No. 2, pp.181–195.

  • Jonas, J.R.O. (2010). Source credibility of company-produced and user-generated content on the internet: An exploratory study on the Filipino youth. Philippine Management Review, 17, 121–132.

  • Jones, Q., Ravid, G. and Rafaeli, S. (2004), “Information overload and the message dynamics of online interaction spaces”, Information Systems Research, Vol. 15 No. 2, pp. 194-210.

  • Keller, K. (2009). Managing the growth tradeoff: Challenges and opportunities in luxury branding. Journal of Brand Management, 16 (5/6), 290-301.

  • Kotler, Philip dan Keller, Kevin Lane. (2009). Manajemen Pemasaran. Jilid 1.Edisi 13. Diterjemahkan oleh: Bob Sabran. Erlangga, Jakarta.

  • Kotler, Philip dan Keller, Kevin Lane. (2009). Manajemen Pemasaran. Jilid 1.Edisi 13. Diterjemahkan oleh: Bob Sabran. Erlangga, Jakarta.

  • Krishnamurthy, S. and Dou, W. (2008), “Advertising with user-generated content: a framework and research agenda”, Journal of Interactive Marketing, Vol. 8 No. 2, pp. 1-7.

  • Lee, J., Park. D.H., & Han, I. (2008). The Effect Of Negative Online Customer Reviews On Product Attitude. An Information Processing View. Electronic Commerce Research And Applications, 7(3), 341-352.

  • Lee. J, Park, D. H, Han I, “The Effect Of Negative Online Customer Reviews On Product Attitude”, An Information Processing View. Electronic Commerce Research and Applications, (2008), 7(3), 341-352.

  • Lo, A.S. and Yao, S.S. (2019), “What makes hotel online reviews credible? An investigation of the roles of reviewer expertise, review rating consistency and review valence”, International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management, Vol. 31 No. 1, pp. 41-60.

  • Ma, L., Sun, B. and Kekre, S. (2015), “The squeaky wheel gets the grease-an empirical analysis of customer voice and firm intervention on Twitter”, Marketing Science, Vol. 34 No. 5, pp. 627-645.

  • Maulana, Roby Irzal. 2018. Peran Citra Merek Memediasi Kredibilitas Celebrity Endorser Terhadap Niat Beli Smartphone Vivo Di Kota Tangsel. Jurnal Pemasaran Kompetitif. 2 (1),2598-2893.

  • Nielsen (2009), “How teens use media”, report, Nielsen, available at: www.nielsen. com

  • Papadopoulou, K., Pavlidou, V. and Hodza, A. (2012). Electronic Word-of-Mouth through Social Networking Sites: How Does it Affect Consumers?. Linnaeus University.

  • Park, D.H. & Lee, J. (2008). E-WOM overload and its effect on consumer behavioral intention depending on consumer involvement. Electronic Commerce Research and Applications, 7, 386-398.

  • Peres, R., Shachar, R. and Lovett, M.J. (2011), “On brands and word of mouth”, MSI Report 11-111, Marketing Science Institute, Cambridge, MA.

  • Robert V. Kozinets, J.L. “E-tribalized marketing: the strategic implications of virtual communities of consumption”, [J]. European Management Journal , 1999, 17 ( 3): 252–264.

  • Sahin, A; Zehir, C; Kitapci, H. 2012. The effects of brand experience and service quality on repurchase intention: The role of brand relationship quality. African Journal of Business Management, 6 (45),11190-11201.

  • Schlosser, A.E. (2005), “Posting versus lurking: communication in a multiple audience context”, Journal of Consumer Research, Vol. 32 No. 2, pp. 260-265.

  • Shao, G. (2009), “Understanding the appeal of user-generated media: a uses and gratification perspective”, Internet Research, Vol. 19 No. 1, pp. 7-25.

  • Shimp, Trence. A., (2010). Integrated marketing communication in advertising and promotions. Eight edition. South-Western: Cengage Learning.

  • Smith, T. D., & McMillan, B. F. (2001). A Primer of Model Fit Indices in Structural Equation Modeling. Annual Meeting of the Southwest Educational Research Association, 4.

  • Spears, N. & Singh S. N. (2004). Measuring attitude toward the brand and purchase intentions. Journal of Current Issues and Research in Advertising, 26 (2), 53- 66.

  • Trusov, M., Bucklin, E.R., & Koen, P. (2009). Effects of word-of-mouth versus traditional marketing: Findings from an internet social networking site. Journal of Marketing, 73 (5), 90-102

  • Wells, J.D., Valacich, J.S. and Hess, T.J. (2011). What signal are you sending? How website quality influences perceptions of product quality and purchase intentions. MIS Quarterly, Vol. 35, No. 2, pp.373–396.

  • Yeap, J.A., Ignatius, J. and Ramayah, T. (2014). Determining consumers’ most preferred E-WOM platform for movie reviews: a fuzzy analytic hierarchy process approach. Computers in Human Behavior, Vol. 31 No. 2, pp. 250-258.


Abstract Views: 467

PDF Views: 0




  • Examining Social Media Usage, Brand Image and E-WOM (Quantity, Quality and Credibility) as Determinants of Purchase Intention

Abstract Views: 467  |  PDF Views: 0

Authors

Alisha Kumar
Research Scholar, Bharati Vidyapeeth (Deemed to be university) Institute of Management and Research New Delhi, India
Navneet Gera
Professor, Jagannath International Management School, Kalkaji New Delhi, India

Abstract


Social media took over the world in no time and proved to be a game changer for better connectivity, shared information, global integration and consumption. On one hand consumers became more enthusiastic about their social media image, products or services they consumer and perception of influencers towards brand, on another brand managers became more proactive about what their consumers are putting and seeking out in this dynamic world of choices. The traditional factors influencing purchase intention become less relevant and the modern factors like social media, E-wom, global trends become more important to analyse. This study aims at identifying social media usage, brand image and E-WOM (quality, quantity and credibility) as the determinants of purchase intention. The research is causal and descriptive in nature. For data collection, self-administered questionnaire was developed and data collection was via convenient sampling method. To check the reliability and data validity, exploratory factor analysis and confirmatory factor analysis was run using SPSS and AMOS.

Keywords


Social Media Usage, E-WOM, E-WOM Quantity, E-WOM Quality, E-WOM Credibility, Brand Image, Purchase Intention

References





DOI: https://doi.org/10.23862/kiit-parikalpana%2F2023%2Fv19%2Fi1%2F220837