Reason-A Technical Journal (Formerly Reason-A Technical Magazine)

Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription Access

Technological Advancements in the Screening and Detection of Breast Tissue Malignancies


Affiliations
1 Amity Institute of Biotechnology, Amity University Uttar Pradesh, Noida- 201301, Sector-125, India
 

Breast tissue malignancy is one among the most common varieties of cancer found worldwide. The number of incidents has been increasing gradually with time. Mammography scanning technique has been found to be one of the trusted methods to detect the lesions in the breast. Although mammography works almost accurately, it is a very invasive and uncomfortable scanning technique the patients have to go through. Young women having very thick breasts are more likely to get a false positive result. To reduce and eradicate all these discrepancies, scientists have been trying to develop and discover certain devices and scanning techniques that would be more accurate and sensitive than the mammograms and will overcome its shortcomings altogether. A number of different scanning techniques and procedures including Sonography, Magnetic Resonance Imaging and others are being used presently for breast cancer screening. This review aims to list and describe all such available technicalities and procedures for imaging along with screening of the breast cancer patients.

Keywords

Breast Cancer, Imaging, Mammography, Advancement, Technology.
User
Notifications
Font Size


  • Momenimovahed, Z. and Salehiniya, H., Epidemiological characteristics of and risk factors for breast cancer in the world, Breast Cancer (Dove Med Press), Vol.11, pp. 151-164,2019.

  • Alibek, K., Kakpenova, A., Mussabe-kova, A. , Sypabekova, M., Karatayeva, N., Role of viruses in the development of breast cancer. Infect Agents Cancer, Vol. 8, 32, 2013.

  • Aswathy, M.A., and Jagannath, M., Detection of breast cancer on digital histopathology images: Present status and future possibilities. Informatics in Medicine Unlocked, Vol. 8, pp. 74-79,2017.

  • Joy, J. E., Penhoet, E. E., Petitti, D. B. and Institute of Medicine (US) and National Research Council (US) Committee on New Approaches to Early Detection and Diagnosis of Breast Cancer (Eds.), Saving Women's Lives: Strategies for Improving Breast Cancer Detection and Diagnosis, National Academies Press (US), 2005.

  • Nazari, S.S. and Mukherjee, P., An overview of mammographic density and its association with breast cancer. Breast Cancer, Vol. 25(3), pp. 259-267,2018.

  • Feng, Y, Spezia, M., Huang, S., Yuan, C., Zeng, Z., Zhang, L., Ji, X., Liu, W., Huang, B. , Luo, W., Liu, B., Lei, Y, Du, S., Vuppalapati, A., Luu, H.H., Haydon, R.C., He, T.C., Ren, G., Breast cancer development and progression: Risk factors, cancer stem cells, signaling pathways, genomics, and molecular pathogenesis. Genes & diseases, Vol. 5(2), pp. 77-106,2018.

  • Parikh, U., Chhor, C.M., Mercado, C.L., American Journal of Roentgenology, Vol. 210(2), pp. 246-255,2018.

  • Bhan, A., Comparative Analysis of Pre- Processing Techniques for Mammo-gram Image Enhancement, Procee-dings of the INCON VIII, International Conference on Ongoing Research in Management and IT, Pune, India, 2013.

  • Loberg, M., Lousdal, M.L., Bretthauer, M., Kalager, M., Benefits and harms of mammography screening. Breast Cancer Res, Vol. 17(1), 63,2015.

  • Esserman, L., Thompson, I.M., Reid, B., Nelson, P., Ransohoff, DF., Welch, HG., Addressing overdiagnosis and overtreatment in cancer: a prescription for change. Lancet Oncol., Vol. 15, pp. 234-242,2014.

  • Reynolds, H., The Big Squeeze: A Social and Political History of the Controversial Mammogram, New York: Cornell University Press, 2012.

  • Sundaram, K.M., Sasikala, D., Rani, P.A.,A Study On Preprocessing A Mammogram Image Using Adaptive Median Filter, Int. J. Innov. Res. Sci. Eng. Technol, Vol. 3, pp. 10333-10337,2018.

  • Hofvind, S., Ponti, A., Patnick, J., Ascunce, N., NJor, S., Broeders, M., Giordano, L., Frigerio, A., TSrnberg, S., Van-Hal, G., Martens, R, M^Jek, O., Danes, J., Von Euler-Chelpin, M., Aasmaa, A., Anttila, A., Becker, N., Pentek, Z., Budai, A., Madai, S., Fitzpatrick, R, Mooney, T., Zappa, M., Ventura, L., Scharpantgen, A., Hofvind, S., Seroczynski, R, Morais, A., Rodrigues, V, Bento, M.J., Gomes de Carvalho, J., Natal, C., Prieto, M., S^nchez-Contador- Escudero, C., Zubizarreta Alberti, R., Fernandez Llanes, S.B., Ascunce, N., Ederra Sanza, M., Sarriugarte Irigoien, G., Salas Trejo, D., Ibanez Cabanell, J., Wiege, M., Ohisson, G., TOrnberg, S., Korzeniewska, M., Wolf, C., Fracheboud, J., Patnick, J., Lancucki, L., Ducarroz, S., Suonio, E.J., False-positive results in mammographic screening for breast cancer in Europe: a iiterature review and survey of service screening programmes. Med Scree. 19 Suppi, Voi. 1, pp. 57-66, 2012.

  • Torrisi, L., Restuccia, N., Torrisi, A., Study of goid nanoparticies for mammo-graphy diagnostic and radiotherapy improvements, Rep. Pract. Oncoi. Radiother. J. Greater Poiand Cancer Cent. Pozn. Poi. Soc. Radiat. Oncoi, Voi. 24, pp. 450-457, 2019.

  • Lowry, K.P., Coiey, R.Y., Migiioretti, D.L., Keriikowske, K., Henderson, L.M., Onega, T, Sprague, B.L., Lee, J.M., Herschorn, S., Tosteson, A.N.A., Rauscher, G., Lee, C., Screening Performance of Digitai Breast Tomosyn-thesis vs Digitai Mammo-graphy in Community Practice by Patient Age, Screening Round, and Breast Density, JAMA Netw Open, Voi. 3(7), e2011792, 2020.

  • Mann, R.M., Kuhi, C.K., Kinkel, K., Boetes, C., Breast MRI: Guidelines from the European Society of Breast Imaging. Eur Radiol, Voi. 18(7), pp. 1307-1318,2008.

  • Newell, M.S., Giess, C.S., Argus, A.D., ACR practice parameter for the performance of contrast enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of the breast, Reston Va: American College of Radiology, 2018.

  • Sardanelll, F., Boetes, C., Borisch, B., Magnetic resonance imaging of the breast: Recommendations from the EUSOMA working group, Eur J Cancer, Voi. 46(8), pp. 1296-1316,2010.

  • Graves, M.J., Zhu, C., Trivedi, R., Saba, L., Suri, J.S., Basic Principies of Magnetic Resonance imaging In 3D Imaging Technoiogies in Atheros-clerosis, Eds. Springer, pp. 153-169,2015.

  • Warner, E., Causer, P.A., Wong, J.W., improvement in DCiS detection rates by MRi over time in a high-risk breast screening study. Breast J, Voi. 17(1), pp. 9-17,2011.

  • Mann, R.M., Kuhi, C.K., Moy, L., Contrast- enhanced MRI for breast cancer screening, J. Magn. Reson. imaging, Voi. 50, pp. 377-390,2019.

  • Waiiyn, J., Anton, N., Akram, S., Vandamme, T.F., Biomedical Imaging: Principies, Technoiogies, Ciinicai Aspects, Contrast Agents, Limitations and Future Trends in Nanomedicines, Pharm. Res., Voi. 36(6), pp. 78,2019.

  • Goidsmith, M., Koutcher, J.A., Damadian, R., NMR in cancer, Xiii: Appiication of the NMR maiignancy index to human mammary tumours, Br. J. Cancer, Voi. 38. pp. 547-554,1978.

  • Rahbar, H., Partridge, S.C., Multipara- metric MR Imaging of Breast Cancer, Magn. Reson. Imaging Clin. North Am., Voi. 24. pp. 223-238,2016.

  • Wang, H., Hu, Y, Li, H., Xie, Y, Wang, X., Wan, W., Preliminary study on identification of estrogen receptor-positive breast cancer subtypes based on dynamic contrast-enhanced mag-netic resonance imaging (DCE-MRI) texture analysis, Gland Surg., Voi. 9, pp. 622-628,2020.

  • Azzam, H., Kamal, R., El-Assaly, H., Metwally, L.I.A., The value of dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI in differentia-ting tripie-negative breast cancer from other subtypes, Egypt J Radioi Nuci Med 50,106, 2019.

  • Amornsiripanitch, N., Bickeihaupt, S., Shin, H.J., Dang, M., Rahbar, H., Pinker, K., Partridge, S.C., Diffusion-weighted MRI for Unenhanced Breast Cancer Screening, Radioiogy, Voi. 293, pp. 504-520,2019.

  • Glaser, K.J., Manduca, A., Ehman, R.L., Review of MR elastography applications and recent developments, J. Magn. Reson. Imaging, Vol. 36, pp. 757-774,2012.

  • Patel, B.K., Samreen, N., Zhou, Y, Chen, J., Brandt, K., Ehman, R., Pepin, K., MR Elastography of the Breast: Evolution of Technique, Case Exam-pies and Future Directions, Clin. Breast Cancer, Vol. 21, 102-111,2020.

  • Sinkus, R., Siegmann, K., Xydeas, T., Tanter, M., Claussen, C., Fink, M., MR elastography of breast lesions: understanding the solid/liquid duality can improve the specificity of contrast-enhanced MR mammography, Magn Reson Med, Vol. 58(6), pp. 1135-1144,2007.

  • Lorenzen, J., Sinkus, R., Lorenzen, M., Dargatz, M., Leussler, C., Roschmann, P., Adam, G., MR elastography of the breast: preliminary clinical results, Rofo Fortschr. Geb. Rdntgenstrahlen NukI, Vol. 174, pp. 830-834,2002.

  • Malayeri, A.A., El Khouli, R.H., Zaheer, A., Jacobs. M.A., Corona-Villalobos, C.P., Kamel, I.R., Macura, K.J., Principles and applications of diffusion-weighted imaging in cancer detection, staging and treatment follow-up. Radiographics, Vol. 31(6), pp. 1773-1791,2011.

  • Durur-Subasi, I., DW-MRI of the breast: A pictorial review. Insights Into Imaging, Vol. 10,61,2019.

  • Bolan, P.J., Meisamy, S., Baker, E.H., Lin, J., Emory, T, Nelson, M., Everson, L.I., Yee, D., Garwood, M., In vivo quantification of choline compounds in the breast with 1H MR spectroscopy, Magn. Reson. Med., Vol. 50, pp. 1134-1143,2003.

  • Jagannathan, N.R., Kumar, M., Seenu, V, Coshic, O., Dwivedi, S.N., Julka, P.K., Srivastava, A.. Rath. G.K., Evaluation of total choline from in-vivo volume localized proton MR spectros-copy and its response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in locally advanced breast cancer, Br. J. Cancer, Vol. 84, pp. 1016-1022,2003.

  • Stanwell, R, Mountford, C., In Vivo Proton MR Spectroscopy of the Breast, Radio Graphics, Vol. 27, pp. 253-266,2007.

  • Flavell, R.R., Naeger, D.M., Mari Aparici, C., Hawkins, R.A., Pampaloni, M.H., Behr,

  • S.C., Malignancies with Low Fluorodeo- xyglucose Uptake at PET/CT: Pitfalls and Prognostic Importance: Resident and Fellow Education Feature, RadioGraphics, Vol. 36, pp. 293-294,2016.

  • Berger, A., How does it work? Positron emission tomography, BMJ, Vol. 326 (7404), 1449,2003.

  • Narayanan, D., Berg, W.A., Dedicated Breast Gamma Camera Imaging and Breast PET: Current Status and Future Directions, PET Clin. Vol. 13(3), pp. 363- 381,2018

  • Jorgensen, J.T., Norregaard, K., Sim6n Martin, M., Oddershede, LB., KJaer, A., Non-invasive Early Response Monitoring of Nanoparticle-assisted Photothermal Cancer Therapy Using 18F-FDG, 18F-FLT and 18F-FET PET/CT Imaging, Nano- theranostics, Vol. 2(3), pp. 201 -210,2018.

  • Shaikh, K.. Krishnan, S., Thanki, R., Breast Cancer Detection and Diagnosis Using Al In Artificial Intelligence in Breast Cancer Early Detection and Diagnosis, Springer International Publishing: Cham, Switzerland, pp. 79-92,2021.

  • Gong, Z., Williams, M.B., Comparison of breast specific gamma imaging and molecular breast tomosynthesis in breast cancer detection: Evaluation in phantoms, Med. Phys, Vol. 42, pp. 4250-4259,2015.

  • Urbano, N.. Scimeca, M., Tancredi, V., Bonanno, E., Schillaci, O., 99mTC- Sestamibi breast imaging: Current status. new ideas and future perspectives, Semin. Cancer Bioi, 2020.

  • Lyman. G.H., Somerfieid, M.R., Bosserman, L.D., Perkins, C.L., Weaver, D.L., Giuiiano, A.E., Sentinei Lymph Node Biopsy for Patients With Eariy-Stage [48] Breast Cancer: American Society of Ciinicai Oncoiogy Clinicai Practice Guideiine Update, J. Ciin. Oncoi., Voi. 35. pp. 561-564,2016.

  • Cox, C.E., Kiiuk, J.V., Riker, A.I., Cox, J.M., [49] Aiired, N., Ramos, D.C., Dupont, E.L., Vrcei, V., Diaz, N., Bouiware, D., Significance of sentinei iymph node micrometastases in human breast cancer, [50] J Am Coil Surg., Voi. 206(2), pp. 261-268.

  • Candeiaria, R., Fornage, B.D., Second-iook US examination of MR-detected [51] breast iesions, J. Clin. Uitrasound, Voi. 39, pp. 115-121,2011.

  • Arora, N., Martins, D., Ruggerio, D., Tousimis, E., Swistel, A.J., Osborne, M.P., Simmons, R.M., Effectiveness of a noninvasive digital infrared thermai imaging system in the detection of breast cancer. The American Journai of Surgery, Voi. 196(4), pp. 523-526,2008.

  • Marmo, A.A., Morris, D.M., Schwaike, M.A., iiiev, I.G., Rogers, S., Eiectricai Potentiai Measurements in Human Breast Cancer and Benign Lesions, Tumor Bioi, Voi. 15, pp. 147-152,1994.

  • Domchek, S.M., The utiiity of ductai iavage in breast cancer detection and risk assessment, Breast Cancer Res.,Voi. 4(2), pp. 51-53,2002.

  • Bao, T., Davidson, N.E., Gene expression profiling of breast cancer, Adv Surg, Voi. 42, pp. 249-260,2008.

  • Marino, A., Battaglini, M., De Pasquale, D., Degl'lnnocenti, A., Ciofani, G., Ultrasound- Activated Piezoelectric Nanoparticles Inhibit Proliferation of Breast Cancer Cells, SciRep.Vol.8,6257,2018.


Abstract Views: 314

PDF Views: 145




  • Technological Advancements in the Screening and Detection of Breast Tissue Malignancies

Abstract Views: 314  |  PDF Views: 145

Authors

Monalisa Kesh
Amity Institute of Biotechnology, Amity University Uttar Pradesh, Noida- 201301, Sector-125, India

Abstract


Breast tissue malignancy is one among the most common varieties of cancer found worldwide. The number of incidents has been increasing gradually with time. Mammography scanning technique has been found to be one of the trusted methods to detect the lesions in the breast. Although mammography works almost accurately, it is a very invasive and uncomfortable scanning technique the patients have to go through. Young women having very thick breasts are more likely to get a false positive result. To reduce and eradicate all these discrepancies, scientists have been trying to develop and discover certain devices and scanning techniques that would be more accurate and sensitive than the mammograms and will overcome its shortcomings altogether. A number of different scanning techniques and procedures including Sonography, Magnetic Resonance Imaging and others are being used presently for breast cancer screening. This review aims to list and describe all such available technicalities and procedures for imaging along with screening of the breast cancer patients.

Keywords


Breast Cancer, Imaging, Mammography, Advancement, Technology.

References





DOI: https://doi.org/10.21843/reas%2F2021%2F62-83%2F212374