Research Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences

Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription Access
Open Access Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Restricted Access Subscription Access

Incorporating Oral Reading Fluency into the Foreign Language Literacy Framework


Affiliations
1 Department of HSS, ITER, SOA University, Jagamara, Khandagiri, Bhubaneswar, Odisha 751030, India
     

   Subscribe/Renew Journal


Oral Reading fluency has been the topic of enough discussion in English L1 settings, as part of reading education and research. However ORF hasn’t been able to gain much attention in FL and L2 settings, except certain preliminary studies on the importance of ORF for second language (L2/FL) learners, done by educators and researchers. Implementing ORF into the FL literacy framework can largely facilitate reading comprehension for students. Therefore, incorporating oral reading fluency in L2 reading should be beneficial as L2 learners need not only read text quickly and smoothly but also comprehend and process information. The current paper is thus an attempt towards a more comprehensive analysis on how oral reading fluency may be incorporated in the FL literacy framework for successful reading comprehension.

Keywords

Oral Reading Fluency, Reading, Second Language Learning, Fluency.
Subscription Login to verify subscription
User
Notifications
Font Size


  • Logan, G. D. (1997). Automaticity and reading: Perspectives from the instance theory of automatization. Reading and Writing Quarterly, 13, 123–146.

  • Adams, M. J. (1990). Beginning to read: Thinking and learning about print. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

  • Hudson, R.F., Mercer, C.D., and Lane, H.B. (2000). Exploring reading fluency: A paradigmatic overview. Unpublished manuscript, University of Florida, Gainesville.

  • Ehri, L.C., and McCormick, S. (1998). Phases of word learning: Implications for instruction with delayed and disabled readers. Reading and Writing Quarterly: Overcoming Learning Difficulties, 14(2), 135–164.

  • Chapman, J.W., and Tunmer, W.E. (1995). Development of young children’s reading self-concepts: An examination of emerging subcomponents and their relationship with reading achievement. Journal of Educational Psychology, 87, 154–16

  • Ehri, L.C. (2002). Phases of acquisition in learning to read words and implications for teaching. In R. Stainthorp and P. Tomlinson (Eds.) Learning and teaching reading. London: British Journal of Educational Psychology Monograph Series II.

  • Share, D. L., and Stanovich, K. E. (1995). Cognitive processes in early reading development: Accommodating individual differences into a model of acquisition. Issues in Education: Contributions from Educational Psychology, 1, 1-57.

  • Kuhn, M.R., and Stahl, S.A. (2000). Fluency: A review of developmental and remedial practices. Ann Arbor, MI: Centre for the Improvement of Early Reading Achievement.

  • LaBerge, D., and Samuels, S.J. (1974). Toward a theory of automatic information processing in reading. Cognitive Psychologist, 6, 293–323.

  • Schwanenflugel, P.J., Hamilton, A.M., Kuhn, M.R., Wisenbaker, J.M., and Stahl, S.A. (2004). Becoming a fluent reader: Reading skill and prosodic features in the oral reading of young readers. Journal of Educational Psychology, 96(1), 119-129.

  • Allington, R.L. (1983). Fluency: The neglected reading goal. The Reading Teacher, 36, 556–561.

  • Dowhower, S.L. (1991). Speaking of prosody: Fluency’s unattended bedfellow. Theory Into Practice, 30, 165–175.

  • Schreiber, P.A. (1980). On the acquisition of reading fluency. Journal of Reading Behavior, 7, 177–186

  • Schreiber, P.A. (1991). Understanding prosody’s role in reading acquisition. Theory Into Practice, 30, 158–164.

  • Chard, D.J., Vaughn, S., and Tyler, B.J. (2002). A synthesis of research on effective interventions for building reading fluency with elementary students with learning disabilities. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 35, 386–406.

  • National Institute of Child Health and Human Development. (2000). Report of the National Reading Panel. Teaching children to read: An evidence-based assessment of the scientific research literature on reading and its implications for reading instruction (NIH Publication No. 00- 4769). Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.

  • Donnes, T. (1999). Extensive reading revisited: An interview with Richard Day and Julian Bamford. The Language Teacher, 23(7), 4-7.Cd

  • Hill, D. (1997). Survey review: Graded readers. English Language Teaching Journal, 51(1), 57- 79.

  • Grabe, W. (1991). Current developments in second language reading research. TESOL Quarterly, 25(3), 375-406.

  • Paran, A. (1996). Reading in EFL: Facts and fictions. English Language Teaching Journal, 50(1), 25-34.

  • Perfetti, C., Van Dyke, J., and Hart, L. (2001). The psycholinguistics of basic literacy. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 21, 127-149.

  • Blum, I., Koskinen, P. A., Tennant, N., Parker, E. M., Straub, M., and Curry, C. (1995). Using audiotaped books to extend classroom literacy instruction into the homes of second language learners. Journal of Reading Behavior, 27, 535-563.

  • Dlugosz, D. W. (2000). Rethinking the role of reading in teaching a foreign language to young learners. English Language Teaching Journal, 54(3), 284-290.

  • Taguchi, E. (1997). The effects of repeated readings on the development of lower identification skills of FL readers. Reading in a Foreign Language, 11, 97-119.

  • Taguchi, E. and Gorsuch, G. J. (2002). Transfer Effects of Repeated EFL Reading on Reading New Passages: A Preliminary Investigation. Reading in a Foreign Language, 14(1), 43- 65. http://nflrc.hawaii.edu/rfl/April2002/taguchi/taguchi.html.

  • Anderson, N. J. (1994). Developing active readers: A pedagogical framework for the second language reading class. System, 22, 177-194.

  • Samuels, S. J., and Farstrup, A. E. (2006a). Reading fluency instruction: Will it be a passing fad or permanent fixture? In S. J. Samuels and E. Farstrup (Eds.), What research has to say about fluency instruction (pp. 1–3)? Newark, DE: International Reading Association.

  • Rasinski, R. V. (2006). A brief history of reading fluency. In S. J. Samuels and E. Farstrup (Eds.), What research has to say about fluency instruction (pp. 4–23)? Newark, DE: International Reading Association

  • Breznitz, A. (2006). Fluency in reading: Synchronization of processes. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum

  • International Reading Association. (2002). Evidence-based reading instruction: Putting the national reading panel report into practice. Newark, DE: International Reading Association.

  • Kuhn, M. R., and Schwanenflugel, P. J. (Eds.). (2008). Fluency in the classroom. New York: The Guilford Press.

  • Kuhn, M. R., and Stahl, S. A. (2004). Fluency: A review of developmental and remedial practices. In R. B. Ruddell and N. J. Unrau (Eds.), Theoretical models and processes of reading (5th ed.) (pp. 412–453). Newark, DE: International Reading Association

  • Samuels, S. J. (2002). Reading fluency: Its development and assessment. In A. E. Frastrup and S. J. Samuels (Eds.), What research has to say about reading instruction (3rd ed.) (pp. 166– 183). Newark, DE: International Reading Association.

  • Samuels, S. J., and Farstrup, A. E. (Eds.). (2006b). What research has to say about fluency instruction. Newark, DE: International Reading Association.

  • Rasinski, T., Blachowicz, C., and Lems, K. (Eds.). (2006). Fluency instruction: Research-based best practices. New York: The Guilford Press.

  • Kame’enui, E., and Simmons, D. C. (2001). Introduction to this special issue: The DNA of reading fluency. Scientific Studies of Reading, 5, 203–210.

  • Wolf, M., and Katzir-Cohen, T. (2001). Reading fluency and its intervention. Scientific Studies of Reading, 5, 211–239.

  • Schwanenflugel, P. J., and Ruston, H. P. (2008). Becoming a fluent reader: From theory to practice. In M. R. Kuhn and P. J. Schwanenflugel (Eds.), Fluency in the classroom (pp. 1– 16). New York: The Guilford Press

  • Topping, K. J. (2006). Building reading fluency: Cognitive, behavioural, and socio-emotional factors and the role of peer-mediated learning. In S. J. Samuels and E. Farstrup (Eds.), What research has to say about fluency instruction (pp. 106–129). Newark, DE: International Reading Association.

  • Biemiller, A. (1977–1978). Relationship between oral reading rates for letters, words, and simple text in the development of reading achievement. Reading Research Quarterly, 13, 223–253.

  • Fuchs, L. S., and Deno, S. L. (1991). Curriculum-based measurement: Current applications and future directions. Exceptional Children, 57, 466–501.

  • Fuchs, D., Fuchs, L. S., Thompson, A., Al Otaiba, S., Yen, L., Yang, N., and Braun, M. (in press). Is reading important in reading-readiness programs? A randomized field trial with teachers as program implementers. Journal of Educational Psychology.

  • Marston, D., Fuchs, L. S., and Deno, S. L. (1985). Measuring pupil progress: A comparison of standardized achievement tests and curriculum-related measures. Diagnostique, 11(2), 77–90.

  • Frederiksen, J. R. (1981). Sources of process interactions in reading. In A. M. Lesgold and C. A. Perfetti (Eds.), Interactive processes in reading (pp. 361–386). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc

  • Gray, W. S. (1925). Summary of investigations relating to reading. Supplementary Educational Monograph No. 28

  • Jenkins, J. R., and Jewell, M. (1993). Examining the validity of two measures for formative teaching: Reading aloud and maze. Exceptional Children, 59, 421–432.

  • Sassenrath, J. M. (1972). Alpha factor analyses of reading measures at the elementary, secondary, and college levels. Journal of Reading Behavior, 5, 304–315.


Abstract Views: 266

PDF Views: 0




  • Incorporating Oral Reading Fluency into the Foreign Language Literacy Framework

Abstract Views: 266  |  PDF Views: 0

Authors

Malavika Mohapatra
Department of HSS, ITER, SOA University, Jagamara, Khandagiri, Bhubaneswar, Odisha 751030, India
Swayamprabha Satpathy
Department of HSS, ITER, SOA University, Jagamara, Khandagiri, Bhubaneswar, Odisha 751030, India

Abstract


Oral Reading fluency has been the topic of enough discussion in English L1 settings, as part of reading education and research. However ORF hasn’t been able to gain much attention in FL and L2 settings, except certain preliminary studies on the importance of ORF for second language (L2/FL) learners, done by educators and researchers. Implementing ORF into the FL literacy framework can largely facilitate reading comprehension for students. Therefore, incorporating oral reading fluency in L2 reading should be beneficial as L2 learners need not only read text quickly and smoothly but also comprehend and process information. The current paper is thus an attempt towards a more comprehensive analysis on how oral reading fluency may be incorporated in the FL literacy framework for successful reading comprehension.

Keywords


Oral Reading Fluency, Reading, Second Language Learning, Fluency.

References