Research Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences

Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription Access
Open Access Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Restricted Access Subscription Access

Relationship of Demographic Characteristics and Distributors' Perception for Network Marketing as an Income Opportunity


Affiliations
1 Delhi School of Professional Studies and Research, 9 Institutional Area, Sector 25, Rohini-110085, Delhi, India
2 Gitarattan International Business School, Sector -14, Rohini-110085, Delhi, India
     

   Subscribe/Renew Journal


This research paper analyzes the relationship of demographic characteristics and distributors' perception for network marketing as an income opportunity. The sample of the research work consists of 381 registered distributors of different network marketing organizations operating in National Capital Region. Data have been analyzed through exploratory factor analysis, t-test and analysis of variance. Results indicate that overall perception of the network marketing distributors has been found positive considering network marketing as an income opportunity. Demographic characteristics like gender, age, monthly income, concerned network marketing organization, job status and network marketing experience have statistically significant influence on distributors' perception regarding network marketing as an income opportunity. Due to rise in cost of living and increased consumption basket of families, network marketing is being considered as an income opportunity.

Keywords

Network Marketing, Distributors, Demographic, Perception.
Subscription Login to verify subscription
User
Notifications
Font Size


  • Alturas, B., Santos, M. C., and Pereira, I. (2005). Determinants of consumers’ satisfaction and acceptance of direct selling. Academy of Marketing Annual Conference, 5th-8th July 2005, School of Marketing, Dublin Institute of Technology, Dublin, Irlanda

  • Berry, R. (1997). Direct Selling from door to door to network marketing, (6th ed.), Oxford: Butterworth- Heinemann.

  • Bloch, B. (1996). Multilevel marketing: what's the catch?, Journal of Consumer Marketing,13(4), 18-26.

  • Brodie, S., Stanworth, J., and Wotruba, T. R. (2002). Comparison of salespeople in multilevel vs. single level direct selling organizations. Journal of Personal Selling and Sales Management, 22(2), 67-75.

  • Bureau, P. R. (2013-14). The Indian Direct Selling Industry Annual Survey 2013-14. Retrieved on August 26, 2014, from http://phdcci.in/file/thematic_pdf/IDSA%20report%202013-14%20inside.pdf.

  • Chouyrod, S. (2009). The effective factor of Chiang University student decision to join network marketing business's analysis, Chiang Mai University.

  • Drafke, M. W., and Kossen, S. (2002). The human side of organisations. Eight edition, Prentice hall of India, New Delhi.

  • Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., and Anderson, R. E. (2010), Multivariate Data Analysis: A Global.

  • Hedges, B. (2001). The parable of the pipeline, Tanpa, FL: INTI Publishing.

  • Higgs, P., and Smith, J. (2007). Rething our world (2nd Edition ed.), South Africa: Juta Academic.

  • Ho, R. (2006). Handbook of univariate and multivariate data analysis and interpretation with SPSS: Chapman and Hall/CRC, Taylor and Francis Group.

  • Kaiser, H. F. (1960). The application of electronic computers to factor analysis. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 20, 141–151.

  • Kaiser, H. F. (1970). A second generation little jiffy. Psychometrika, 35, 401–415.

  • Kiaw, C. O. S., and Run, E. C. D. (2007). Why Malaysians join and stay on in a multilevel marketing company. Journal of Service Marketing, 5(4), 37-52.

  • Kiyosaki, R. T. (2004). Rich dad, poor dad (7th ed.), London: Time Warner.

  • Koehn, D. (2001). Ethical issues connected with Multilevel Marketing schemes. Journal of Business Ethics, 29(1/2), 153-160.

  • Koroth, A. A. (2011). Relevance of Multilevel Marketing in Kerala. University of Calicut, Calicut.

  • Krige, D. (2012). Fields of dreams, fields of schemes: Ponzi finance and multilevel marketing in South Africa. Journal of International African Institute, 82(1), 69-92.

  • Msweli, P., and Sargeant, A. (2001). Modelling distributor retention in network marketing organizations. Journal of Marketing Intelligence and planning, 19(7), 507-514.

  • Muncy, J. A. (2004). Ethical issues in multilevel marketing: Is it a legitimate business or just another pyramid scheme. Marketing Education Review, 14(3), 47-53.

  • Peterson, R. A., and Wotruba, T. R. (1996). What is direct selling? Definition, perspectives and research agenda. Journal of Personal Selling and Sales Management, 16(4), 1-8.

  • Pratt, M. G. (2000). The good, the bad and the ambivalent: Managing identification among Amway distributors. Administrative Science Quarterly, 45, 456-493.

  • Stávková, J., Stejskal, L., and Toufarová, Z. (2008). Factors influencing consumer behaviour.Agric. Econ. – Czech, 54(6), 276–284.

  • Stevens, J. P. (2002), Applied multivariate statistics for the social sciences (4th ed.): NJ: Erlbaum, Hillsdale.

  • Vander, P. J., and Keep, W. W. (2002). Marketing fraud: An approach for differentiating Multilevel Marketing from pyramid schemes.Journal of Public Policy and Marketing, 21(1), 139-151.


Abstract Views: 341

PDF Views: 0




  • Relationship of Demographic Characteristics and Distributors' Perception for Network Marketing as an Income Opportunity

Abstract Views: 341  |  PDF Views: 0

Authors

Pratistha
Delhi School of Professional Studies and Research, 9 Institutional Area, Sector 25, Rohini-110085, Delhi, India
Monika Gulia
Gitarattan International Business School, Sector -14, Rohini-110085, Delhi, India

Abstract


This research paper analyzes the relationship of demographic characteristics and distributors' perception for network marketing as an income opportunity. The sample of the research work consists of 381 registered distributors of different network marketing organizations operating in National Capital Region. Data have been analyzed through exploratory factor analysis, t-test and analysis of variance. Results indicate that overall perception of the network marketing distributors has been found positive considering network marketing as an income opportunity. Demographic characteristics like gender, age, monthly income, concerned network marketing organization, job status and network marketing experience have statistically significant influence on distributors' perception regarding network marketing as an income opportunity. Due to rise in cost of living and increased consumption basket of families, network marketing is being considered as an income opportunity.

Keywords


Network Marketing, Distributors, Demographic, Perception.

References