Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription Access
Open Access Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Restricted Access Subscription Access

A Study on Clinical Profile of Patients with Acute Severe Pancreatitis on Carbapenem Versus Non-Carbapenems


Affiliations
1 Koringa College of pharmacy, Korangi, East Godavari Dist., - 533462, Andhra Pradesh, India
2 Koringa College of Pharmacy, Korangi-533461, Tallarevu (M), East Godavari Dist., Andhra Pradesh, India
     

   Subscribe/Renew Journal


The present study focussed on the clinical profile of patients with acute severe pancreatitis on carbapenem Vs. non carbapenems. Out of 55 patients 22 patients were given carbapenem antibiotics and rest were given non carbapenem antibiotics which comprises of cephalosporins, fluoroquinolones, Piperacillin+tazobactum, Metronidazole. In the carbapenem group 20 patients were initially on cephalosporins and later they were started on carbapenem as they were not improving. In these 20 patients, renal failure is observed in 14 patients and respiratory failure in 6 patients. All these 20patients survived and they stayed in hospital for 3-5 weeks. Two patients in carbapenem group died and they had renal and respiratory failure even they were started on carbapenem in the first week. These two patients stayed in hospital for 3weeks. A total of 33 patients were given non carbapenem antibiotics. Out of 33 patients 16 patients had renal failure and 12 patients had multiorgan failure. 8 patients had local complications in form of multiple fluid collections and necrosis more than 50%. 22 out of patients received cefaperazone+sulbactum with Fluoroquinolones. 7 patients received only Piperacillin+Tazobactum with Fluoroquinolones. 4 patients received only Fluoroquinolones. 30patients who were on cephalosporins stayed 2-3 weeks and all 30 patients improved and were discharged. 3 Patients out of 33 died in the first week due to multiorgan failure. This study conclude that cefaperazone sulbactum along with quinolone is a good first choice antibiotic and reserve the imipenem for sicker and non responders to cephalosporins.

Keywords

Acute Severe Pancreatitis, Carbapenem Antibiotics, Non-Carbapenem, Respiratory Failure, Multiorgan Failure, Fluoroquinolones.
Subscription Login to verify subscription
User
Notifications
Font Size


  • Bradley EL 3rd. A clinically based classification system for acute pancreatitis. Summary of the International Symposium on Acute Pancreatitis, Atlanta, Ga, September 11 through 13, 992. Arch Surg. May 1993;128(5):586-90.
  • Sommermeyer, Lucille (December 1935). "Acute Pancreatitis". American Journal of Nursing Io (Philadelphia, PA: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins) 35 (12): 1157-1161.
  • Banks P, Freeman M (2006). "Practice guidelines in acute pancreatitis". Am J Gastroenterol 101 (10): 2379-400.
  • Baron TH, Morgan DE. Acute necrotizing pancreatitis. New Engl j Med 1999; 340:1412-17.
  • AGA Institute medical position statement on acute pancreatitis. Gastroenterology 2007; 132:2019-21.
  • Smith R, Southwell-Keely J, Chesher D (2005). "Should serum pancreatic lipase replace serum amylase as a biomarker of acute pancreatitis?” ANZ J Surg 75 (6): 399-404.
  • Scaglione M, Casciani E, Pinto A, Andreoli C, De Vargas M, Gualdi GF (2008). "Imaging assessment of acute pancreatitis: a review". Semin Ultrasound CT MR 29 (5): 322-340.
  • Johnson CD, Abu-Hilal M. Persistent organ failure during the first week as a marker of fetal outcome in acute pancreatitis. Gut 2004; 53:1340.
  • Arvanitakis M, Koustiani G, Gantzarou A, Grollios G, Tsitouridis I, Haritandi-Kouridou A, Dimitriadis A, Arvanitakis C (2007). "Staging of severity and prognosis of acute pancreatitis by computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging-a comparative study". Dig Liver Dis. 39 (5): 473-482.
  • Bhatia M, Wong FL, Cao Y, et al. Pathophysiology of acute pancreatitis. Pancreatology 2005; 5:132-44.
  • Beger HG, Rau B, Mayer J, Pralle U. Natural course of acute pancreatitis. World J Surg 1997; 21:130-5.
  • Sheehy TW. Acute Alcoholic Pancreatitis. Continnuing Education. 1980:87-88, 92-3, 97-100,105,107,109.
  • Isenmann R, Rau B, Beger HG. Early severe acute pancreatitis: characteristics of a new subgroup. Pancreas 2001; 22:274.
  • Wu BU, Johannes RS, Sun X, et al. The early prediction of mortality in acute pancreatitis: a large population-based study. Gut 2008; 57:1698.
  • Simchuk EJ, Traverso LW, Nukui Y, Kozarek RA .Computed tomography severity index is a predictor of outcomes for severe pancreatitis. Am j Surg 2000; 179:352.

Abstract Views: 305

PDF Views: 0




  • A Study on Clinical Profile of Patients with Acute Severe Pancreatitis on Carbapenem Versus Non-Carbapenems

Abstract Views: 305  |  PDF Views: 0

Authors

D. Sarojini
Koringa College of pharmacy, Korangi, East Godavari Dist., - 533462, Andhra Pradesh, India
P. Sunitha
Koringa College of Pharmacy, Korangi-533461, Tallarevu (M), East Godavari Dist., Andhra Pradesh, India
L. K. Kanthal
Koringa College of Pharmacy, Korangi-533461, Tallarevu (M), East Godavari Dist., Andhra Pradesh, India
K. Lavanya
Koringa College of Pharmacy, Korangi-533461, Tallarevu (M), East Godavari Dist., Andhra Pradesh, India
Kausik Bhar
Koringa College of Pharmacy, Korangi-533461, Tallarevu (M), East Godavari Dist., Andhra Pradesh, India

Abstract


The present study focussed on the clinical profile of patients with acute severe pancreatitis on carbapenem Vs. non carbapenems. Out of 55 patients 22 patients were given carbapenem antibiotics and rest were given non carbapenem antibiotics which comprises of cephalosporins, fluoroquinolones, Piperacillin+tazobactum, Metronidazole. In the carbapenem group 20 patients were initially on cephalosporins and later they were started on carbapenem as they were not improving. In these 20 patients, renal failure is observed in 14 patients and respiratory failure in 6 patients. All these 20patients survived and they stayed in hospital for 3-5 weeks. Two patients in carbapenem group died and they had renal and respiratory failure even they were started on carbapenem in the first week. These two patients stayed in hospital for 3weeks. A total of 33 patients were given non carbapenem antibiotics. Out of 33 patients 16 patients had renal failure and 12 patients had multiorgan failure. 8 patients had local complications in form of multiple fluid collections and necrosis more than 50%. 22 out of patients received cefaperazone+sulbactum with Fluoroquinolones. 7 patients received only Piperacillin+Tazobactum with Fluoroquinolones. 4 patients received only Fluoroquinolones. 30patients who were on cephalosporins stayed 2-3 weeks and all 30 patients improved and were discharged. 3 Patients out of 33 died in the first week due to multiorgan failure. This study conclude that cefaperazone sulbactum along with quinolone is a good first choice antibiotic and reserve the imipenem for sicker and non responders to cephalosporins.

Keywords


Acute Severe Pancreatitis, Carbapenem Antibiotics, Non-Carbapenem, Respiratory Failure, Multiorgan Failure, Fluoroquinolones.

References