Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription Access

Judicial Interpretation of SARFAESI Act 2002 in the Direction of Strengthening Creditors Protection Regime in India


Affiliations
1 N. S. Soti Law College, Sangli, Maharashtra, India
 

Before SARFAESI Act 2002 , the Debt Recovery Regime in India was absolutely a Pro-Debtors regime and judicial mechanism was also not at par with global standards, resulting in piling of NPA.s. Therefore SARFAESI act 2002 was enacted with the desired objective of reducing NPAs. Initially, there was opposition to the Act through challenge proceedings ï¬led in DRTs to writ petitions ï¬led in High Courts. The Judicial pronouncements which unearth the sentential legis and strengthen the Creditors Protection regime are worth recapitulation.

Keywords

Debt Recovery, Creditors Protection, Security Interest.
User
Notifications
Font Size

  • M.R.Umarji, Law & Practice Relating to Securitisation& Reconstruction of Financial Assets & Enforcement of Security Interest, Taxmann, 6th Edition,
  • VinodKothari, Securitisation, Asset Reconstruction & Enforcement of security Interests : Lexis Nexis, 4th Edition, 2013.
  • K.Pandurang Rao, .Law relating Securitization& Reconstruction of ï¬nancial assets & Enforcement of security interests : Asia Law House, 6th Edition, 2013.
  • K. Pandurang Rao, Law relating to Debt Recovery Tribunals , Asia Law House, 8th Edition, 2017.
  • Justice Srivastava A.B., Securitisation & Debt Recovery Laws along withallied acts& rules: Law Publishers (India) Pvt. Ltd, 6th Edition 2009.
  • S.N. Gupta, The Banking Law in Theory & Practice, Universal Law Publishing Co., 5th Edition in 3 Volumes, 2010.
  • Prashanth K. Reddy "A Comparative study of Non Performing Assets in India in the Global Context - similarities and dissimilarities, remedial measures" www.iimahd.ernet.in , last seen on 12/12/2015
  • Manish Gupta and Dr. Naresh Malhotra “ A Comparative Study of SARFAESI Act 2002 and Other Tools Available For the Recovery of NPAs†, International Journal for Research in Applied Science & Engineering Technology (IJRASET) ISSN: 2321-9653; Volume 5 Issue XI November 2017- available at www.ijraset.com, last seen on 01/02/2018
  • Dr. Vijay Kumar, Mrs. Chanchal Rani “ Contributors to success of Securitization Act †IJRFM Volume 4, Issue 6 (June 2014) (ISSN 2231-5985) International Journal of Research in Finance & Marketing , available at http://www.euroasiapub.org , last seen on 15-10-2015.
  • V. Sekar, Dr. V. Balachandran, “ Implementation of SARFAESI Act –Some Issues †International Journal of Management and Social Sciences Research (IJMSSR) ISSN: 2319-4421, Volume 2, No.1, January 2013, available at www.irjcjournals.org, last seen on 21-11-2015
  • Ajit Singh Cheema“ SARFAESI Act : Delaying Tactics Used by the Borrowers†Bank Quest, The Journal of Indian Institute of Banking & Finance Vol. : 83 u No. : 1 January - March 2012 (ISSN 0019 4921)
  • Dr. K.S.Ravichandran, “ Remedy against enforcement of security interest-options are limited†COMPANY CASES, Volume 157-2010 ( Journal)

Abstract Views: 118

PDF Views: 97




  • Judicial Interpretation of SARFAESI Act 2002 in the Direction of Strengthening Creditors Protection Regime in India

Abstract Views: 118  |  PDF Views: 97

Authors

Amit M. Savadi
N. S. Soti Law College, Sangli, Maharashtra, India

Abstract


Before SARFAESI Act 2002 , the Debt Recovery Regime in India was absolutely a Pro-Debtors regime and judicial mechanism was also not at par with global standards, resulting in piling of NPA.s. Therefore SARFAESI act 2002 was enacted with the desired objective of reducing NPAs. Initially, there was opposition to the Act through challenge proceedings ï¬led in DRTs to writ petitions ï¬led in High Courts. The Judicial pronouncements which unearth the sentential legis and strengthen the Creditors Protection regime are worth recapitulation.

Keywords


Debt Recovery, Creditors Protection, Security Interest.

References





DOI: https://doi.org/10.21904/weken%2F2019%2Fv4%2Fi1%2F170758