ANVESHAK-International Journal of Management

Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription Access
Open Access Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Restricted Access Subscription Access

Motivation among Higher Education Academicians:A Factor Analytical Approach


Affiliations
1 Department of Management Studies, YMCA University of Science and Technology, Faridabad, Haryana, India
2 Department of Management Studies, DAV Institute of Management, Faridabad, Haryana, India
     

   Subscribe/Renew Journal


Motivation refers to the way a person is enthused at work to intensify his desire and willingness to use his energy for the achievement of organization's objectives. Motivation is vital to all organizations. The motivation among academicians is far more important for development of young generation. This research paper aims to identify the factors which motivate academicians of higher education. A comprehensive literature review on motivation was done to finalise the variables of assessing academicians' motivation level and their further inclusion in structured questionnaire. This questionnaire was used to acquire data from the academicians working in different institutes and universities of NCR region. The factors were identified by conducting an Exploratory Factor Analysis (EFA) using SPSS 19.0 version. Through EFA twelve factors were extracted namely Recognition of Seniority, Growth opportunities, Interpersonal Relationship, Participative Management, Responsibility with Authority, Job Security, Personal Factor, Performance Management System, Monetary Benefits, Top Management Support, Student Feedback and Appreciation, Research Based activities. The results of this study may help public and private academic bodies to examine the motivation level of faculty members, thereby to formulate different policies to further improve their motivation level.

Keywords

Motivation, Exploratory Factor Analysis, Factors of Motivation, Academicians, Higher Education.
Subscription Login to verify subscription
User
Notifications
Font Size


  • All India Survey on Higher Education 2011-12, Government of India Ministry of Human Resource Development Department of Higher Education, New Delhi, 2013.

  • Baron, H., Henley, S., Mc Gibbon, A. & Mc Carthy, T., (2002), Motivation questionnaire manual and user’s guide, Sussex: Saville and Holdsworth Limited.

  • Child, D., (2006), The Essentials of Factor Analysis, 3rd edn. Continuum International Publishing Group. New, York, NY.

  • Comrey, L.A. & Lee, H.B., (1992), A first in Factor Analysis, in Hillside, 2nd edition, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

  • Devadass, Rajeswari, (2011), “Employees Motivation in Organizations: An integrative literature Review”, International Conference on Sociality and Economics Development, IPED Vol. 10, IACSIT Press, Singapore.

  • Field, A.P., (2005), Discovering statistics using SPSS, 2nd edition, Sage, London.

  • Gliem, J. A., & Gliem, R. R., (2003), “Calculating, interpreting, and reporting Cronbach’s alpha reliability coefficient for Likert-type scales.” Midwest Research to Practice Conference in Adult, Continuing, and Community Education, retrieved January 10, 2008 from http://www.alumni-osu.org/ midwest/midwest%20papers/Gliem%20&%20Gliem--Done.pdf.

  • Gupta, Deepti. & Gupta, Navneet., (2012), “Higher Education in India: Structure, Statistics and Challenges”, Journal of Education and Practice, 2012, Vol. 3, No. 2, pp. 17-24.

  • Hair, J.F, Jr, Black, C.W., Babin, J.B., Anderson, R.E., & Tatam, L.R., (2006), Multivariate Data Analysis, 6th edn, Prentice-Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ.

  • Hersey, P., & Blanchard, K., (1969), Management of Organizational Behaviour, Prentice]Hall, Inc., Englewood Cliffs, NJ, pp. 34-5.

  • Hill, M., D., (1986), gA Theoretical Analysis of Faculty Job Satisfaction/ Dissatisfactionh, Educational Research, Quaterly, pp. 36-44.

  • Kapur, D., & Mehta Pratap B., (2007), Indian Higher Education Reform: From Half-Baked Socialism to Half-Baked Capitalism, Presentation at BrookingsNCAER India Policy Forum 2007, New Delhi.

  • Kovach, K., A., (1987), gWhat Motivates Employees? Workers and Supervisors Give Different Answersh, Business Horizons, 1987, Vol. 30, No. 5, pp. 58-65.

  • Kovach, K.A., (1980), gWhy motivational theories donft Work?h, SAM Advanced Management Journal, 1980, Vol. 45, No. 2, pp. 54-90.

  • Kumar, Ravi, B., (2013), gFactors Affecting the Motivation of Teaching Staff (An Empirical Study with Reference to Engineering Colleges, Krishna Districth, Review of Arts and Humanities, 2013, Vol. 2, No. 1, pp. 34-39.

  • Lacy, F., J., Sheehan, B.A., (1997), gJob Satisfaction Among Academic Staff: An International Perspectiveh, Higher Education, 1997, Vol. 34, No. 3, pp. 305-322.

  • Leung, T., Siu, O. & Spector, (2000), gFaculty Stressors, Job Satisfaction, and Psychological Distress Among University Teachers in Hongkong: The Role of Locus of Controlh. International Journal of Stress Management, 2000, Vol. 7, No. 2, pp. 121.138.

  • Locke E.A., Latham G.P. (2002), gBuilding a Practically Useful Theory of Goal Setting and Task Motivationh, American Psychologist, 2002, Vol. 57, No. 9, pp. 705-717.

  • Mushtaq, A., Sajid, Imrab, Shaheen, (2013), Factors Responsible for High and Low Motivational Level of University Academicians, International Journal of Science and Research, 2013, Vol. 2, No. 2, pp. 603-608. ISSN: 2319-7064.

  • Nulty, D., (2008, June), gThe Adequacy of Response Rates to Online and Paper Surveys: What Can Be Done?h, Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 2008, Vol. 33, No. 3, pp. 301-314.

  • Pearson, D. A., & Seiler, R. E., (1983), gEnvironmental Satisfiers in Academiciansh, Higher Education, 1983, Vol. 12, No. 1, pp. 35-47.

  • Rowley, J., (1996), gMotivation and Academic Staff in Higher Education, Quality Assurance in Education, 1996, Vol. 4, No. 3, pp. 11-16.

  • Sinha S., Singh Ajay Kr., Gupta N., Dutt R., (2010), gImpact of Work Culture on Motivation and Performance Level of Employees in Private Sector Companies.h Acta Oeconomica Pragensia, 2010, Vol .6, pp. 49-62.

  • Tabchnick, B.G., & Fidell, L.S., (2007), Using Multivariate Statistics, 5th edn., Allyn & Bacon. Boston, MA.

  • Thomas, Li-Ping, Tang, & Mitchell, Chamberlain, (2010), “Effects of Rank, Tenure, Length of Service, and Institution on Faculty Attitudes towards Research and Teaching: The Case of Regional State Universities”, Taylor and Francis Online Journal, pp. 103-110.

  • Tien, Flora, F., and Blackburn, Robert, T., (1996), “Faculty Rank System, Research Motivation, And Faculty Research Productivity: Measure Refinement and Theory Testing”, Journal of Higher Education, 1996, Vol. 67, pp. 2-11.

  • Wiley, C., (1997), “What Motivates Employees According to Over 40 Years of Motivation Surveys”, International Journal of manpower, 1997, Vol. 18, No. 3, pp. 263-280.


Abstract Views: 484

PDF Views: 0




  • Motivation among Higher Education Academicians:A Factor Analytical Approach

Abstract Views: 484  |  PDF Views: 0

Authors

Anushree Chauhan
Department of Management Studies, YMCA University of Science and Technology, Faridabad, Haryana, India
Manisha Goel
Department of Management Studies, YMCA University of Science and Technology, Faridabad, Haryana, India
Ritu Gandhi Arora
Department of Management Studies, DAV Institute of Management, Faridabad, Haryana, India

Abstract


Motivation refers to the way a person is enthused at work to intensify his desire and willingness to use his energy for the achievement of organization's objectives. Motivation is vital to all organizations. The motivation among academicians is far more important for development of young generation. This research paper aims to identify the factors which motivate academicians of higher education. A comprehensive literature review on motivation was done to finalise the variables of assessing academicians' motivation level and their further inclusion in structured questionnaire. This questionnaire was used to acquire data from the academicians working in different institutes and universities of NCR region. The factors were identified by conducting an Exploratory Factor Analysis (EFA) using SPSS 19.0 version. Through EFA twelve factors were extracted namely Recognition of Seniority, Growth opportunities, Interpersonal Relationship, Participative Management, Responsibility with Authority, Job Security, Personal Factor, Performance Management System, Monetary Benefits, Top Management Support, Student Feedback and Appreciation, Research Based activities. The results of this study may help public and private academic bodies to examine the motivation level of faculty members, thereby to formulate different policies to further improve their motivation level.

Keywords


Motivation, Exploratory Factor Analysis, Factors of Motivation, Academicians, Higher Education.

References





DOI: https://doi.org/10.15410/aijm%2F2018%2Fv7i1%2F119884