Open Access
Subscription Access
Open Access
Subscription Access
Role and Challenges of Objectivity in the Sociological Research: An Overview
Subscribe/Renew Journal
Sociology starts with positive philosophy, founding fathers of sociology like Auguste Comte, Durkheim and Spencer strenuously advocated that methods applied to the natural sciences such as physics should be applied to the study of social behavior (Benton and Craib, 2001). As far as ‘objectivity’ is concerned, positivist methodological approaches claim that ‘objectivity’ is an ideal that is attainable, as the social reality of society can be observed it without any antecedents. Objectivity is a goal of scientific investigation. Science involves use of systematic methods of empirical investigation, the analysis of data, theoretical thinking and logical assessment of argument to develop a body of knowledge about a particular subject matter (Giddens and Sutton, 2013). So sociology is a scientific study of human behavior because both quantitative and qualitative research involved systematic method of investigation and s on. However, the concept of objectivity has increasingly been held within the field as problematic and it is still questionable because the subject matter of sociology which is not exactly as subject matter of natural science and since researchers are also part of the society, it is difficult to do research as value-free that is why Max Weber takes middle position and explain the importance of objectivity in social science with value relevance and also develop some methodological or conceptual tool to understand society. Yet still objectivity in sociological research takes a very suspicious or debatable place. In this paper I am dealing with the explanation of the roles and challenges of objectivity in sociological research and my research questions are - 1. What are the role and status of objectivity in the sociological research, 2. What are the most challenges faced while establishing objectivity. 3. What is an alternative of objectivity in sociological research, 4. Identify and distinguish theories for supporting or rejecting objectivity in sociology. This paper is based on secondary sources and descriptive in nature.
Keywords
Interpretivism, Objectivity, Positivism, Social research, Subjectivity, Value-free
Subscription
Login to verify subscription
User
Font Size
Information
- Berger, Peter L. & Luckmann T. (1966). The Social Construction of Reality: A Treatise in the Sociology of Knowledge. Harmondsworth: Penguin. 1966.
- Benton, T., & Craib, I. (2001). Philosophy of Social Science: The Philosophical Foundations of Social Thought. New York: Palgrave. 2001.
- Berger, A.S. (2010). Sociological research methods and techniques. 2010. http;//www.slideshare.net/ aubynjm/sociologicl-researchmethods.
- Bernstein, R.J. (1983). Beyond Objectivism and Relativism. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press. 1983. https://doi.org/10.9783/9780812205503
- Durkheim, E. (1970). Suicide: A study in sociology. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul. 1970.
- Giddens, A. & Sutton,W. P. (2013). Sociology.7th edition: John Wiley and Sons.
- Husserl, E. (1970). The Crisis of European Sciences and Transcendental Phenomenology. Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press. 1970.
- Haralambos, M., Holborn, M. (2008). Sociology: Themes and Perspective. UK. Harper Collins. 2008.
- Iheriohanma, E. B. J. (2013). Science and the Scientific Nature of Research in the Social Sciences. Studies in the Sociology of Science. 2013.
- Little, W. (2012). Introduction to Sociology. Canadian Publication. 2012.
- Lorraine, D. & Peter, G. (2010). Objectivity. New York: Zone Books. 2010.
- Marten, S. (2014). The Limitations of Social Research. London & New York: 4th Ed. 2014. Routledge Taylor &. Francis Group. 2014.
- Mertens, D. M. (2003). Mixed methods and the politics of human research: The transformative-emancipatory perspective. Tashakkori, A., & teddlie, C. (Eds). Handbook on mixed methods in the behavioural and social sciences. Sage Publications: Thousand Oaks, CA; 2003.
- Merton, R. K. (1963). Basic Research and Potentials of Relevance. American Behavioral Scientist: Sage Journals. 1963. https://doi.org/10.1177/000276426300600925
- Nagel, T. (1989). The view from nowhere. New York: Oxford University Press. 1989.
- Pandey, K. (2014). Objectivity in Social Sciences. 2014. https://ssrn.com/abstract=2399299 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.239929
- Powell, C. (2014). Objectivity and Subjectivity in Classical Sociology. 2014. https://practicaltheorist.wordpress.com/2014/03/10/objectivity-and-subjectivity-in-classic al-sociology
- Strong, T. (2008). A Review of Lorraine Daston and Peter Galison’s Objectivity. The Weekly Qualitative Report: Volume 1. 2008.
- Schutz, A. (1962). The Problem of Social Reality: Collected Papers I. The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff. 1962.
- Schutz, A. (1964). Studies in Social Theory: Collected Papers II. The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff. 1964.
- Sociology, Guide. Problems of Objectivity.
Abstract Views: 433
PDF Views: 0