Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription Access
Open Access Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Restricted Access Subscription Access

Energy Consumption and Economic Growth in India: A Causality Analysis


Affiliations
1 Unique Institute of Management, Pune, India
     

   Subscribe/Renew Journal


This article examines the relationship between electricity consumption and economic growth in India for the period of 1970 to 2011. The close relationship between economic growth and electricity consumption suggests that energy policies of a country affect its economic growth. Earlier literature provides four hypothesis on relationship between economic growth and electricity consumption i.e., growth hypothesis, conservative hypothesis, feedback hypothesis and neutrality hypothesis. One of the objectives of this study is to find out which hypothesis is applicable to India. This study is based on secondary data and required data is collected from World Bank database. The main objective of this study is to find out long run relationship and direction of relationship between electricity consumption and economic growth. ADF test is used to find out stationary data series and level of integration between GDP and electricity consumption. Cointegration test is used to find out long run relationship between electricity consumption and economic growth. Granger causality model is used to examine causal effect between electricity consumption and economic growth. This study found that data series of GDP and electricity consumption are non-stationary at its level and stationery at 1st difference. Both the series are integrated with order one i.e. I(1). Result of cointegration test indicates no long run relationship between electricity consumption and GDP. Also, Granger causality test indicates no causal relationship between electricity consumption and GDP. On the basis of findings, it is concluded that electricity consumption does not affect the GDP, so government should focus on gradual shift towards non-renewable sources of energy.

Keywords

GDP, Electricity Consumption, ADF Test, Cointegration Test, Granger Causality Test.
Subscription Login to verify subscription
User
Notifications
Font Size


  • Belke, A., Dreger, C. and Haan, F. (2010), “Energy Consumption And Economic Growth– New Insights Into The Cointegration Relationship”, RUHR Economic Papers, Paper No.190, ISSN 1864-4872, pp. 4–22.
  • Asghar, Azid (2008), “Energy-GDP Relationship: A Causal Analysis for the Five Countries of South Asia”, Applied Econometrics and International Development, Vol. 8–1, pp. 167–180
  • Nondo, C., Kahsai, M. and Schaffer, P. (2010), “Energy Consumption and Economic Growth: Evidence from COMESA Countries”, Southwestern Economic Review, Vol. 1, pp. 107–117
  • Bekhet, Hussain Ali and Othman, N. (2011), “Causality Analysis Among Electricity Consumption, Consumer Expenditure, Gross Domestic Products and Foreign Domestic Investment”, Case Study of Malaysia, Vol. 1, pp. 1–25
  • Shaari, M. and Hussain, N. (2013), “Relationship between Energy Consumption And Economic Growth: Empirical Evidence From Malaysia”, Business Systems Review, Vol. 2, Issue 1, pp. 17–28.
  • Shahbaz, M., Zeshan, M. and Afza, T. (2012), “Is Energy Consumption Effective to Spur Economic Growth in Pakistan? New Evidence From Bounds Test to Level Relationships And Granger Causality Tests”, Asia Economic and Social Society, working Paper Series No. 01/August, 2012, pp. 2–24
  • Hou, Quing (2009), “The Relationship between Energy Consumption and Economic Growth In China”, International Journal of Economics and Finance, Vol. 1, No. 2, pp. 232–236.
  • Soytas, U. and Sari, R. (2003), “Energy Consumption and GDP: Causality Relationship in G7 Countries and Emerging Market”, Energy Economics, Issue 25, pp. 33–37
  • Dantama, Y. and Inuwa, N. (2012), “A Granger Causality Examination of the Relaltionship between Energy Consumtion & Economic Growth in Nigeria”, Journal of Economic, Commerce and Research, Vol. 2, Issue 2, pp. 14–24

Abstract Views: 859

PDF Views: 0




  • Energy Consumption and Economic Growth in India: A Causality Analysis

Abstract Views: 859  |  PDF Views: 0

Authors

Vikas Ramesh Adhegaonkar
Unique Institute of Management, Pune, India

Abstract


This article examines the relationship between electricity consumption and economic growth in India for the period of 1970 to 2011. The close relationship between economic growth and electricity consumption suggests that energy policies of a country affect its economic growth. Earlier literature provides four hypothesis on relationship between economic growth and electricity consumption i.e., growth hypothesis, conservative hypothesis, feedback hypothesis and neutrality hypothesis. One of the objectives of this study is to find out which hypothesis is applicable to India. This study is based on secondary data and required data is collected from World Bank database. The main objective of this study is to find out long run relationship and direction of relationship between electricity consumption and economic growth. ADF test is used to find out stationary data series and level of integration between GDP and electricity consumption. Cointegration test is used to find out long run relationship between electricity consumption and economic growth. Granger causality model is used to examine causal effect between electricity consumption and economic growth. This study found that data series of GDP and electricity consumption are non-stationary at its level and stationery at 1st difference. Both the series are integrated with order one i.e. I(1). Result of cointegration test indicates no long run relationship between electricity consumption and GDP. Also, Granger causality test indicates no causal relationship between electricity consumption and GDP. On the basis of findings, it is concluded that electricity consumption does not affect the GDP, so government should focus on gradual shift towards non-renewable sources of energy.

Keywords


GDP, Electricity Consumption, ADF Test, Cointegration Test, Granger Causality Test.

References





DOI: https://doi.org/10.15410/aijm%2F2015%2Fv4i2%2F67717