Evaluations of Private and National Brand in Men's Apparel: Effects of Product Attributes
Subscribe/Renew Journal
The purpose of this study was to study consumer preference towards private and national brand in men's apparel among consumers. Literature review indicates that the current study argues, based on theoretical framework that product attributes dimension have an impact on attitude toward men's apparel in Delhi-NCR.
The research design is cross-sectional based on descriptive methodology. The instrument designed for the research study relates to product attributes of men's apparel. Validity and reliability of the instrument is established with appropriate statistical measure of Cronbach's Alpha. Cluster sampling has been used with a sample size of 500 consumers. The mall intercept survey, structured questionnaire was employed to collect the primary data in Delhi NCR. A total of 460 respondents completed and returned useable questionnaires.
The findings reveal that factors affecting consumer preferences towards private versus national brand in men's apparel differed significantly and product attributes of men's apparels have significant relationship with brand preferences. Consumers had an overall more positive attitude towards national brand apparel over private label/ brand apparel. Furthermore, the perceived quality of national brand apparel was rated higher than that of private brand. High price, lack of discount/ offers and fashionable apparels are the reasons for not purchasing national brand whereas price consciousness, colour range, discount/ offers are considered for preferring private brand in men's apparel by the consumers.
Keywords
- Ailawadi, K.L., Neslin, S.A. and Gedenk, K. (2001), “Pursuing the Value-conscious Consumer: Store Brands Versus National Brand Promotions”, Journal of Marketing, (Jan): pp. 71-89.
- Beaudoin, P., Moore, M.A. and Goldsmith, R.E. (1998), “Young Fashion Leaders’ and Followers’ Attitudes toward American and Imported Apparel”, Journal of Product & Brand Management, Vol. 7 (3), pp. 193–207.
- Beneke, J. (2009), “Consumer Perceptions of Private Label Brands within the Retail Grocery Sector of South Africa”, African Journal of Business Management, Vol. 4(2), pp. 203–220.
- Boyle, M. (2003), “Brand Killers Store Brands Aren't for Losers Anymore”, In fact, they are Downright Sizzling. Retrieved 19 January 2014 from: http://money.cnn.com/magazines/ fortune/fortune _archive/2003 /08/ 11/346850/index.htm
- Burton, S., Lichtenstein, D.R., Netemeyer, R.G. and Garretson, J.A. (1998), “A Scale for Measuring Attitude toward Private Label Products and an Examination of its Psychological and behavioral Correlates”, Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, Vol. 26(4), pp. 293–306.
- Buttle, F. (1996), “Servqual: Review, Critique, Research Agenda”, European Journal of Marketing, Vol. 30(1), pp. 8–32.
- Carpenter, D. (2007), Kraft Net Falls 19 Percent, Associated Press, (January). Retrieved 22 November 2013, from: http://in .us.biz.yahoo.com/ap/070131/earns_kraft.html?.v=4
- Casielles, R.V. (2008), “Effects of Price Decisions on Product Categories and Brands”, Asia Pacific Journal of Marketing and Logistics, Vol. 20(1), pp. 23–43.
- CII Report (2008), Retail Scenario in India-unlimited Opportunity. Retrieved 14 January 2014, from: http://www.ibef.org/attachdisplay.aspx?cat_id=375andart_id=4165.
- Deloitte Touche Tohmatsu Limited (2013), Retrieved 28 November 2013, from: https://www. deloitte.com/view/en_ IN/in/index.htm
- Kisholoy, R. (2008), “Private Brands in Organised Retail”, Marketing Mastermind, Vol. 8(12), pp. 31–36.
- Kotler, P. and Gary, A. (2006), Principles of Marketing. New Delhi: Prentice Hall India Pvt. Ltd.
- KPMG (2004), Consumer Loyalty and Private Label Products. KPMG Research Series. Retrieved 11 December 2013, from: www.kpmg.ca/en/cib/consumer/documents/ CustomerLoyalty.pdf
- KPMG (2009), Indian Retail: Time to Change Consumer Markets. Retrieved 18 January 2014, from.:www.kpmg. com/in/en/pages/indianretail-timetochangelanes.aspx
- Likert, R. (1932), “A Technique for the Measurement of Attitude Scales, Archives of Psychology, p. 140.
- Lincoln, K. and Thomassen, L. (2008), Privatelabel: Turning the Retail Brand Threat into your Biggest Opportunity, London: Kogan Page.
- Malhotra, N.K. (2010), Marketing Research: An Applied Orientation, (4thed.). Delhi: Pearson Education.
- Mendenhall, W., James, E. Reinmuth and Beaver, R.J. (1993), Statistics for Management and Economics, Pearson Education.
- Nielsen, A.C. (2005), Consumer Attitudes towards Private Label: Global Study. Retrieved 19 November 2013, from: http://www2.acnielsen.com/press/documents/ACNielsen_PrivateLabel_GlobalSummary.pdf
- Pallant, J. (2005), SPSS Survival Manual, (2nded.). Glasgow: Open University Press.
- Private Label Manufacturers Association (2007), Growth and Success. Private Label Today. Retrieved 29 October 2013, from: http://www.plmainternational.com /private _label_en .htm
- Retail Authority of India (2014), Retrieved 26 October 2013, from: http://www.rai.net.in/
- Sample Size Calculator. Retrieved 16 May 2013, from: http://www.surveysystem.com /sscalc.Htm
- Sharma, J.K. (2005), Business Statistics (3rdReprint). New Delhi: Pearson Education.
- Sharma, Dubey and Pandey (2010), “Customer Perception of Store Brands Vs National Brands in Select Are of Maharashtra”, Journal of Engineering, Science & Management Education, Vol. 4, pp. 59–65.
Abstract Views: 622
PDF Views: 1