Open Access
Subscription Access
Open Access
Subscription Access
Analyzing the Utility of Faculty Development Programs:A Faculty Perspective
Subscribe/Renew Journal
Faculty Development Programs (FDP) are intended to prevent faculty from being outdated, especially, in the field of higher education where most recent synthesized knowledge has to be incorporated in the course content so that students can get the first-hand conceptual understanding of new knowledge. Apart from this, there are some more specific objectives of the FDPs such as to bridge the skill gap created by the intrusion of the technology and technology based teaching tools, to meet the anticipated need of career advancement in order to fulfil academic oriented administrative challenges. This research paper discusses what faculty members think about faculty development program in terms of benefits offered by these programs. This paper also intends to analyze the benefits of such programs for B-schools. The outcomes show that most of the faculty perceive that FDP are linked to development of the B-Schools. The outcomes also reveal that FDP improve the faculty retention ability of the B-school. Results also disclose that FDP improves faculty retention ability, communication skills, presentation skills, innovative way of content delivery and classroom teaching etc. Though not quite deeply, but through this paper, it also tries to understand the nature of faculty development program.
Keywords
Faculty Development Programs, Faculty Perspective, Skill Gap, Benefits of Faculty Development Programs.
Subscription
Login to verify subscription
User
Font Size
Information
- Austin, J.M. (2013), (n.d.). Retrieved September 5th, 2013, from www.academicfreedomjournal.org: www.academicfreedomjournal.org/volumeone/V1Main.html
- Canals, J. (2013, Sept), Seeking a Greater Impact: New Challenges for B-Schools, http://www.iese.edu.
- Gaff, J.G., Pruitt-Logan, A.S., Sims, L.B. and Denecke, D.D. (2003), Preparing Future Faculty in the Humanities and Social Sciences: A guide for change, Council of graduate schools and the association of American colleges and universities. Washington DC
- Kavita Bhatnagar, K. (2012), (n.d.). Retrieved December 20th, 2012, from http://medind.nic.in: http://medind.nic.in/icg/t10/i2/icgt10i2p138.pdf
- Knapper, C. (2012), (n.d.). Retrieved December 5th, 2012, from http://cll.mcmaster.ca: http://cll.mcmaster.ca/scholarship/pdf/strategies_and_barriers.pdf
- Kolmos, O.V. (2012, December 20th), National Strategies for Staff and Faculty Development in Engineering Education in Denmark, www.wiete.com.au/journals.
- Nelson, P.D. and Morreale, S.P. (2002), “Disciplinary Leadership in Preparing Future Faculty: The Humanities and Social Sciences”, Liberal Education, Vol. 88(3), pp. 28–33.
- Randall, L.E. (2012), (n.d.), Rethinking Faculty Development: Toward Sustaining a Community of Learners, Retrieved December 5th, 2012, from http://umbfacultydevelopment.wikispaces.umb.edu: http://umbfacultydevelopment.wikispaces.umb.edu/file/view/Camblin_Rethinking+Facu lty+Devel.pdf
- Sales, J., Comeau, D., Liddle, K., Perrone, L., Palmer, K. and Lynn, D. (2007), “Preparing Future Faculty: An Interdisciplinary, Undergraduate Science Course Taught by Graduate and Postdoctoral Teacher-scholars”, Journal of College Science Teaching, Vol. 36(4), pp. 24–30.
- Steinert, Y. (2011), “Faculty Development for Postgraduate Education–The Road Ahead”, Members of the FMEC PG consortium.
Abstract Views: 743
PDF Views: 0