Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription Access
Open Access Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Restricted Access Subscription Access

Performance of Potato Varieties under Different Moisture Management Systems and Planting Geometry


Affiliations
1 Department of Vegetable Science, College of Forestry, Veer Chandra Singh Garhwali Uttarakhand University of Horticulture and Forestry, Ranichauri, Tehri Garhwal (Uttarakhand), India
     

   Subscribe/Renew Journal


Present investigation was conducted during summer-rainy season (March-July) of 2013 in the temperate hills of Tehri-Garhwal, Uttarakhnad (2000 m altitude, 78°24' E longitude and 30°18' N latitude). Among the treatments planting geometry e.g. single row (60x20 cm) and paired rows (15 cm apart paired rows at 60 x20 cm) and irrigation systems viz., furrow and drip with or without dried grass mulching were tested in all possible combinations across the varieties viz., Kufri Girdhari and Kufri Himalini. In paired row planting, tubers of 20±5 g weight were planted in 15 cm apart paired-rows on ridges spaced at 60x20cm (centre to centre) as against seed tubers of 40-50 g in single row planting geometry at 60x20 cm spacing and thus, the seed rate in all treatments was kept constant (20 q/ha). Results indicated that Kufri Himalini was found to be promising for tuber yield (30.7 t/ha) as affected by combination of planting geometry and irrigation system. Among the cultural practices, paired row planting geometry accompanied with furrow irrigation system (T5) was found to be the best cultural combination for tuber yield (35.2 t/ha). The combination of paired row planting geometry and drip irrigation system (T7) was second most important treatment (33.1 t/ha). When cultivars and cultural combination are considered simultaneously, Kufri Himalini exhibited maximum tuber yield in paired row planting system accompanied with furrow irrigation (36.3 t/ha) followed by at par values of Kufri Girdhari in paired row planting system accompanied with furrow irrigation (34.0 t/ha). Based on the results it could be concluded that two varieties of potato Kufri Girdhari and Kufri Himalini responded well to paired row panting geometry. Among the cultural packages paired row planting + furrow irrigation was most promising combination for tuber yield (35.2 t/ ha) followed by paired row planting + drip irrigation (33.1 t/ha) in temperate Himalayas.

Keywords

Paired-Row, Planting Geometry, Drip Irrigation System, Moisture Imbibition, Furrow Irrigation, Mulching.
Subscription Login to verify subscription
User
Notifications
Font Size


  • Ahire, N.R., Bhoi, P.G. and Solanke, A.V. (2000). Effect of row spacing and planting system on growth and yield of potato under surface and drip irrigation. J. Indian Potato Assoc., 27(1-2): 59-60
  • Anonymous (2012). Annual Report 2011-12. Central Potato Research Institute, Shimla, 67 p.
  • Anonymous (2014). Report of the Quinquennial Review Team on Central Potato Research Institute, Shimla and Aii India Coordinated Research Project on Potato (1 January, 2006 to 31 March, 2013). CPRI, Shimla. pp. 53-54.
  • Bisht, P., Raghav, M. and Singh, V.K. (2012). Effect of different irrigation schedules on the growth and yield of drip irrigated potato. Potato J., 39(2): 202-04.
  • Imam, S.A., Delwar Hossain, A.H.M., Sikka, L.C. and Midmore, D.J. (1990). Agronomic management of potato/sugarcane intercropping and its economic implications. Field Crops Res., 25 (1-2) : 111-22
  • Kumar, M. and Trehan, S.P. (2012). Influence of potato cultivars and N levels on contribution of organic amendments to N nutrition. Potato J., 39(2) : 133-44.
  • Mishra, A.C. (2013). Increasing profitability and resource conservation through paired-row planting geometry in potato. Potato J., 40 (2): 180-183.
  • Murti, G.S.R., Singh, M., Saha, S.N. and Banerjee, V.N. (1976). Effect of night temperatures in the pre- and post-tuber initiation phases on development of potato under short days. Indian J. Agric. Sci., 46 : 65-73.
  • Patel, C. K., Sasani, G.V., Patel, R. N., Chaudhari, S. M., Patel, N.H. and Vihol, K.J. (2005). Effect of planting methods on yield and economics of potato under north Gujarat conditions. Potato J., 32 (3-4): 121-25
  • Saxena, R. and Mathur, P. (2013). Analysis of potato production performance and yield variability in India. Potato J., 40 (1): 38-44
  • Singh, B.P. and Singh, S.V. (2007). Potato cultivation in Western Uttar Pradesh. In: Souvenir: Potato production and utilization in India. XXVI Biennial Group Meeting of AICRP on Potato, September 7-9, 2007 at RAU, Pusa Bihar. pp. 123-127.
  • Singh, M. (1981). Final report of the emeritus scientist scheme. Increasing the efficiency of the major inputs for potato production for the period 7.1.1976 to 6.1.1981. Punjab Agricultural University, Ludhiana.
  • Singh, N., Sood, M.C. and Singh, S.P. (2010 )Y. ield and economics of potato (Solanum tuberosum L.) influenced by raised bed planting patterns and drip layout systems. Prog. Agric., 10 : 29-34.
  • Singh, S.K. and Lal, S.S (2012). Effect of potassium nutrition on potato yield, quality and nutrient use efficiency under varied levels of nitrogen application. Potato J., 39(2): 155-165.
  • Verma, R.B. , Kumar, Arbind and Pathak, S.P. (2013). Studies on nutrient management in potato. Potato J., 40 (1): 72-75.

Abstract Views: 242

PDF Views: 0




  • Performance of Potato Varieties under Different Moisture Management Systems and Planting Geometry

Abstract Views: 242  |  PDF Views: 0

Authors

A. C. Mishra
Department of Vegetable Science, College of Forestry, Veer Chandra Singh Garhwali Uttarakhand University of Horticulture and Forestry, Ranichauri, Tehri Garhwal (Uttarakhand), India
Vivek Pandey
Department of Vegetable Science, College of Forestry, Veer Chandra Singh Garhwali Uttarakhand University of Horticulture and Forestry, Ranichauri, Tehri Garhwal (Uttarakhand), India

Abstract


Present investigation was conducted during summer-rainy season (March-July) of 2013 in the temperate hills of Tehri-Garhwal, Uttarakhnad (2000 m altitude, 78°24' E longitude and 30°18' N latitude). Among the treatments planting geometry e.g. single row (60x20 cm) and paired rows (15 cm apart paired rows at 60 x20 cm) and irrigation systems viz., furrow and drip with or without dried grass mulching were tested in all possible combinations across the varieties viz., Kufri Girdhari and Kufri Himalini. In paired row planting, tubers of 20±5 g weight were planted in 15 cm apart paired-rows on ridges spaced at 60x20cm (centre to centre) as against seed tubers of 40-50 g in single row planting geometry at 60x20 cm spacing and thus, the seed rate in all treatments was kept constant (20 q/ha). Results indicated that Kufri Himalini was found to be promising for tuber yield (30.7 t/ha) as affected by combination of planting geometry and irrigation system. Among the cultural practices, paired row planting geometry accompanied with furrow irrigation system (T5) was found to be the best cultural combination for tuber yield (35.2 t/ha). The combination of paired row planting geometry and drip irrigation system (T7) was second most important treatment (33.1 t/ha). When cultivars and cultural combination are considered simultaneously, Kufri Himalini exhibited maximum tuber yield in paired row planting system accompanied with furrow irrigation (36.3 t/ha) followed by at par values of Kufri Girdhari in paired row planting system accompanied with furrow irrigation (34.0 t/ha). Based on the results it could be concluded that two varieties of potato Kufri Girdhari and Kufri Himalini responded well to paired row panting geometry. Among the cultural packages paired row planting + furrow irrigation was most promising combination for tuber yield (35.2 t/ ha) followed by paired row planting + drip irrigation (33.1 t/ha) in temperate Himalayas.

Keywords


Paired-Row, Planting Geometry, Drip Irrigation System, Moisture Imbibition, Furrow Irrigation, Mulching.

References