AMC Indian Journal of Civil Engineering

Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription Access

A Comparative Study of Seismic Behavior of High Rise Building with Diagrid Structure and Conventional RCC Framed Structure


Affiliations
1 M. Tech. Scholar, Civil Engineering Department, Odisha University of Technology and Research, Bhubaneshwar, India
2 Professor, Civil Engineering Department, Odisha University of Technology and Research, Bhubaneshwar, India

   Subscribe/Renew Journal


Construction of tall buildings with various structural systems is on the rise these days. Due to its adaptability and attractive look, the Diagrid system is a prominent technology in high-rise buildings. In this study, a structural model of 32 storey buildings is analyzed using the ETAB software, and various metrics, such as storey stiffness, storey displacement, storey shear, and storey drift in different seismic zones are derived. Comparison is done among these parameters for 36 different cases and the best of the configuration is found out.

Study of the these parameters is done by adopting Response Spectrum Method for Zone II and Zone V. This study concludes that the square shaped building with 2-storey module diagrid column shows less displacement, less storey drift and higher stiffness among all the considered cases.


Keywords

Diagrid, Response Spectrum Method, Storey Drift, Storey Shear, Storey Displacement, Storey Stiffness, and Base Shear.

Paper Submission Date : April 15, 2023 ; Paper sent back for Revision : April 29, 2023 ; Paper Acceptance Date : May 6, 2023 ; Paper Published Online : June 5, 2023

User
Subscription Login to verify subscription
Notifications
Font Size

  • K. A. Bhat and P. Danish, “Analyzing different configurations of variable angle diagrid structures,” Materials Today: Proc., vol. 42, no. 2, pp. 821–826, 2021, doi: 10.1016/j.matpr.2020.11.372.

  • K. P. Bhatta, N. Chaudhary, and G. Singh, “Review paper on diagrid system in tall building,” Int. Res. J. Eng. Tech., vol. 6, no. 8, 2019. [Online]. Available: https://www.irjet.net/archives/V6/i8/IRJET-V6I847.pdf

  • G. Dethe, M. Banagar, P. Kenjale, A. Das, M. Dusane, and K. Prajapati, “Analysis of Diagrid Structure,” Int. Res. J. Eng. Tech., vol. 5, no.3, 2018.

  • A. V. Gorle and S. D. Gowardhan, “Optimum performance of diagrid structure,” Int. J. Eng. Res, vol. 5, no. 3, pp. 583–585, 2016.

  • M. S. Rana, M. F. Hossain, and A. Tahmid, “Parametric study of diagrid structure compared with rigid frame structure subjected to lateral loading,” Malaysian J. Civil Eng., vol. 34, no. 3, pp. 37–46, 2022, doi: 10.11113/mjce.v34.18733.

  • P. L. Isaac and B. A. Ipe, “Comparative study of performance of high rise buildings with Diagrid, Hexagrid and Octagrid systems under dynamic loading,” Int. Res. J. Eng. Technol., vol. 4, no. 5, 2017.[Online]. Available: https://www.academia.edu/33567014/Comparative_Study_of_Performance_of_High_Rise_Buildings_with_Diagrid_Hexagrid_and_Octagrid_Systems_under_Dynamic_Loading

  • H. Jeevitha, T. N. Guruprasad, T. V. Mallesh, and S. R. Ramesh, “A study on behaviour of Diagrid structure using pushover analysis,” vol. 6, no. 8, 2019. [Online]. Available: https://www.irjet.net/archives/V6/i8/IRJET-V6I8331.pdf

  • S. Kiran, and N. M. Yogesh, “Comparative analysis of Conventional structure and Diagrid structure,” Int. J. Res. Eng. Sci., vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 46–53, 2021. [Online]. Available: https://www.ijres.org/papers/Volume-10/Issue-1/Ser-2/H10014653.pdf

  • S. S. Mali, D. M. Joshi, and R. John, “Response of high rise building with different Diagrid structural system,” Int. J. Sci. Tech. Eng., vol. 4, no. 5., pp. 144–150, 2017. [Online]. Available: http://www.ijste.org/articles/IJSTEV4I5020.pdf

  • S. R. Naik, S. N. Desai, and M. P. Naik, “Earthquake responses of Diagrid buildings and conventional moment frame buildings having different H/B ratio considering seismic non-linear time history analysis,” Int. J. Civil Eng. Tech., vol. 9, no. 13, pp. 1532–1539, Dec. 2018. [Online].Available: https://iaeme.com/Home/article_id/IJCIET_09_13_154

  • P. Y. Rudrappa and S. M. Maheshwarappa, “Comparative study on high rise RC Flat -slab building performance for lateral loads with and without Diagrid system,” Int. J. Eng. Res. Adv. Technol., vol. 4, no. 8, pp. 70–79, Aug. 2018, doi: 10.31695/IJERAT.2018.3316.

  • A. Panchal and A. Suthar, “A review paper on comparative analysis of Diagrid structure with various Indian seismic zone,” Int. Res. J. Eng. Tech., vol. 9, no. 1, 2022. [Online]. Available: https://www.irjet.net/archives/V9/i1/IRJET-V9I1269.pdf

  • A. Senthilkumar and R. Umamaheswari, “Comparative analysis of a conventional structure and a Diagrid structure subjected to seismic loading,” Int. J. Recent Advances Multidisciplinary Topics, vol. 2, no. 7, pp. 255–258, 2021.

  • A. K. Potdar and G. R. Patil, “Optimum design of concrete diagrid building and its comparison with conventional frame building,” Int. Res. J. Eng. Technol., vol. 4, no. 8, pp. 1471–1476, 2017. [Online]. Available: https://www.irjet.net/archives/V4/i8/IRJET-V4I8262.pdf

  • A. R Prajapati and A. G. Hansora, “Parametric study on Diagrid structural system with and without shear walls,” vol. 7, no. 3, pp. 1–9, Jun. 2021. [Online]. Available: 10.22161/ijcmes.73.1.

  • S. Rathore and S. Pahwa, “Dynamic analysis of diagrid structural system for RC building structure,” Int. J. Res. Appl. Sci. Eng. Tech., vol. 7, no. 12, pp. 48–56, Dec. 2019, doi: 10.22214/ijraset.2019.12008.

  • Criteria for earthquake resistant design of structures, IS 1893 Part 1: General Provisions and Buildings, 2002. [18] Plain and Reinforced Concrete - Code of Practice (Fourth Revision), IS 456, 2000.


Abstract Views: 263

PDF Views: 0




  • A Comparative Study of Seismic Behavior of High Rise Building with Diagrid Structure and Conventional RCC Framed Structure

Abstract Views: 263  |  PDF Views: 0

Authors

Ajaya Kumar Behera
M. Tech. Scholar, Civil Engineering Department, Odisha University of Technology and Research, Bhubaneshwar, India
P. K. Parhi
Professor, Civil Engineering Department, Odisha University of Technology and Research, Bhubaneshwar, India

Abstract


Construction of tall buildings with various structural systems is on the rise these days. Due to its adaptability and attractive look, the Diagrid system is a prominent technology in high-rise buildings. In this study, a structural model of 32 storey buildings is analyzed using the ETAB software, and various metrics, such as storey stiffness, storey displacement, storey shear, and storey drift in different seismic zones are derived. Comparison is done among these parameters for 36 different cases and the best of the configuration is found out.

Study of the these parameters is done by adopting Response Spectrum Method for Zone II and Zone V. This study concludes that the square shaped building with 2-storey module diagrid column shows less displacement, less storey drift and higher stiffness among all the considered cases.


Keywords


Diagrid, Response Spectrum Method, Storey Drift, Storey Shear, Storey Displacement, Storey Stiffness, and Base Shear.

Paper Submission Date : April 15, 2023 ; Paper sent back for Revision : April 29, 2023 ; Paper Acceptance Date : May 6, 2023 ; Paper Published Online : June 5, 2023


References





DOI: https://doi.org/10.17010/ijce%2F2023%2Fv6i1%2F173002