Drishtikon: A Management Journal

Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription Access
Open Access Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Restricted Access Subscription Access

Team Effectiveness, Innovative Work Culture and Employee Engagement in Selected Information Technology Companies in Kolkata, India:A Study


Affiliations
1 School of Business, University of Bolton, Academic Centre-Ras Al Khaimah, United Arab Emirates
     

   Subscribe/Renew Journal


Highly competitive, transmuting market demand, and expeditious technology change, has made the management of knowledge, indispensable. The contented, committed and loyal project teams have always proved themselves to be the asset to the companies. Impeccable blends of personnel with subject matter experts (SMEs), project managers, team lead ensure the companies a competitive advantage in the market. Transformational leadership, cohesiveness, perpetual sharing of information helps each individual in one hand, on the other, stiff competition among group members, organizational politics always engenders grievance and conflict resulting in poor organizational performance. The exploratory study aimed to understand the impact of project team over employee appreciation, task autonomy of the organization and sequentially their comprehensive effect on employee Engagement. Empowerment in decision making, team reward schemes has shown a positive influence on team effectiveness. The research study has been conducted to understand the role of team, on employee Engagement mediated through the innovation appreciating organizational culture.

Keywords

Team Effectiveness, Empowerment Agreement, Innovation.
Subscription Login to verify subscription
User
Notifications
Font Size


  • Amabile, T. M. (1996). Creativity in context: Update to the social psychology of creativity. Boulder, CO:: Westview Press.

  • Bakke, J. (1992). IBM’s New OS/2 Software: It’s a Go! Think, 58, 12- 19.

  • BoseBiswas, S. (2014). Performance appraisal system for executives: A case study in some selected IT companies in West Bengal. Kalyani: University of Kalyani.

  • Boxall, P., & Macky, K. (2007). High-performance work systems and organisational performance: Bridging theory and practice. Asia Pacific Journal of Human Resources, 45(3), 261-270.

  • Bunce, D., & West, M. A. (1995). Self perceptions and perceptions of group climate as predictors of individual innovation at work. Applied Psychology: An International Review, 44, 199-215.

  • Campion, M. A., & Medsker, G. J. (1992). Job Design. In S. G. (Eds), Handbook of Industrial Engineering (2nd ed.) (pp. 845-881). New York: Willey.

  • Campion, M. A., Papper, E. M., & Medsker, G. J. (1996). Relations between work team characteristics and effectiveness: A replication and extension. Personnel Psychology, 49, 429-452.

  • Delaney, J., & Huselid, M. (1996). The impact of human resource management practices on perceptions of organizational performance. Academy of Management Journal, 39(4), 949-969.

  • Dyer, J. (1984). Team research and team training: A state -of-the art review. In F. A. Muckler, Human Factors FReview (pp. 285-323). Santa Monica: CA: Human Factor Society.

  • Edvinsson, L., & Sullivan, P. (1996). Developing a model for managing intellectual capital. European Management Journal, 14(4), 356-364.

  • Farr, J. L., & Ford, C. M. (1990). Individual innovation. In M. A. West, & J. L. Farr (Eds.), Innovation and creativity at work: Psychological and organizational strategies (pp. 63–80). Chichester, U.K.:: Wiley.

  • Festinger, L. (1950). Informal social communication. Psychological Review, 57, 271-282.

  • Ghosh, A. K. (2013). Employee empowerment: A strategic tool to obtain sustainable competitive advantage. International Journal of Management, 30(3), 95-107.

  • Gladstein, D. L. (1984). Groups in context: A model of task group effectiveness. Administrative Science Quarterly, 29, 499-517.

  • Gottschalk, P., & Karlsen, J. (2005). A comparison of leadership roles in internal IT projects versus outsourcing projects. Industrial Management & Data Systems, 105(9), 1137-49.

  • Guzzo, R. A., & Dickson, M. W. (1996). Teams in organizations: Recent research on performance and effectiveness. Annual Review Psychology, 47, 307-338.

  • Guzzo, R. A., & Shea, G. P. (1992). Group Performance and intergroup relations in organizations. In M. D. Dunnette, & L. M. Hough, Handbook of Industrial and Organizational Psychology (2nd Ed vol. 3) (pp. 269-313). Palo Alto: Consulting Psychologists Press.

  • Hackman, J. (1987). The Design of Work Team. In J. W. Lorsch, “Handbook of Organizational Behavior” (pp. 315 - 342). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.

  • Harris, P. R., & Harris, K. G. (1996). Managing effectively through teams. Team Performance Management: An International Journal, 2(3), 23-36.

  • Hu¨lsheger, U. R., Anderson, N., & Salgado, J. F. (2009). Team-level predictors of innovation at work: A comprehensive meta-analysis spanning three decades of research. Journal of Applied Psychology, 94(5), 1128-1145.

  • Janssen, O. (2003). Innovative behavior and job involvement at the price of conflict and less satisfactory relations with co-workers. Journal of Organizational and Occupational Psychology, 76, 347-364.

  • Janssen, O., & Van Yperen, N. W. (2004). Employees’ goal orientations, the quality of leader-member exchange, and the outcomes of job performance and job satisfaction. Academy of Management Journal, 47, 368-384.

  • Jehn, K. (1999). Why differences make a difference: a field study of diversity, conflict, and performance in workgroups. Administrative Science Quality, 44(4), 741-63.

  • Jiang, J., Klein, G., & Pick, R. (2003). The impact of IS department organizational environments upon project team performances. Information & Management, 40(3), 213-20.

  • Johnson, D. W., & Johnson, R. T. (1995). Social interdependence - Cooperative learning in education. In B. &. (Eds.), Conflict, Cooperation, and Justice (pp. 205-251). San Francisco:: Jossey-Bass Publishers.

  • Kanter, R. (1988). When a thousand flowers bloom: Structural, collective, and social conditions for innovation in organizations”. In B. Staw, & L. Cummings, Research in Organizational Behavior, 10(pp. 169-211). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.

  • Kanter, R. M. (1983). The change masters. New York: Simon & Schuster.

  • Ketchum, L. (1984). How redesigned plants really work. National Productivity Review, 3, 246-254.

  • King, N., & Anderson, N. (1990). Innovation in working groups. In M. A. West, & J. L. Farr (Eds), Innovation and creativity at work: Vol. (pp. 81-100). Chichester. England:: Wiley.

  • Kling, J. (1995). High Performnace work systems and firm performance. Labour Review, 29-36.

  • Landy, F., & Farr, J. (1983). The measurement of work performance: Methods, theory, and application. New York, NY.: : Academic Press.

  • Liden, R. C., Wayne, S. J., Bradway, L., & Sparrowe, R. (1994). Leading Empowered Work group. Drasgow, F (Chair). Work group empowerment: Conceptual and practical issues. Ninth Annual Conference, Inc. Nashville: Society for Industrial Organizational Psychology.

  • Messner, W. (2009). Working with India: The sofeter aspect of a successful collaboration with the Indian IT & BPO industry. Berlin: Springer.

  • Mohrman, A. M., Mohrman, S. A., & Lawler, E. F. (1992). The performance management of teams. In J. B. William, Performance Measurement, evaluation and Incentives (pp. 217-241). Boston, M A: Harvard Business School Press.

  • Munton, A. G., & West, M. A. (1995). Innovations and personal change: Patterns of adjustment to relocation. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 16, 363-375.

  • Nonaka, I., & Takeuchi, H. (1995). The knowledge-creating company. Rinehart and Winston: New York, NY.

  • Oldham, G. R., & Cummings, A. (1996). Employee creativity: Personal and contextual factors at work. Academy of Management Journal, 39, 607-634.

  • Pattern, J. H. (1981). Organizational Developemnt through team building. New York: A Wileinter Science Publication.

  • Pearce, J. A., & Ravlin, E. C. (1987). The design and activation of self regulating work group. Human Relations, 50, 751-782.

  • Phister, M. J. (1979). Data processing: Technology and economics. Santa Monica. California.

  • Salas, E., Dickinson, T. L., Converse, S. A., & I, T. S. (1992). Towards an understanding of team performance. In R. W. Swezey, & E. Salas, Teams: Their training and performance (pp. 3-29). Norwood: NJ : Ablex.

  • Scott, S. G., & Bruce, R. A. (1994). Determinants of innovative behavior: A path model of individual innovation in the workplace. Academy of Management Journal, 37, 580-607.

  • Scott, S. G., & Bruce, R. A. (1994). Determinants of innovative behavior: A path model of individual innovation in the workplace. Academy of Management Journal, 37(3), 580-607.

  • Shea, G. P., & Guzzo, R. A. (1987). Groups as Human Resource. In K. M. Rowland, & F. G. (Eds), Research in Human Resources and Personnel Mangement, vol. 5 (pp. 323-356). Greenwich CT: Jai Press.

  • Tschang, T. (2001). The basic characteristic of skills and organizational capabilities in the Indian software industry. Tokyo: ADB Institute.

  • Ugboro, I. O., & Obeng, K. (2000). Top management leadership, employee empowerment, job satisfaction and customer satisfaction in TQM organizations: An empirical study. Journal of Management, 5, 247-272.

  • Upadhya, C., & Vasavi, A. R. (2006). Work, culture and sociality in the Indian IT industry: A sociological study. Bangalore: School of Social Sciences, National Institute of Advanced Studies.

  • Van de Ven, A. (1986). Central problems in the management of innovation. Management Science, 32, 590-607.

  • Walton, R. E. (1985). From control to commitment in the workplace. Harvard Business Review, 63(2), 76-84.

  • Wick, C. T. (1995). The importance of team skill for software development. Vancouber, Canada: The University of British Columbia.

  • Woodman, R. W., Sawyer, J. E., & Griffin, R. W. (1993). Toward a theory of organizational creativity. Academy of Management Review, 18 , 293-321.


Abstract Views: 226

PDF Views: 0




  • Team Effectiveness, Innovative Work Culture and Employee Engagement in Selected Information Technology Companies in Kolkata, India:A Study

Abstract Views: 226  |  PDF Views: 0

Authors

Indranil Bose
School of Business, University of Bolton, Academic Centre-Ras Al Khaimah, United Arab Emirates

Abstract


Highly competitive, transmuting market demand, and expeditious technology change, has made the management of knowledge, indispensable. The contented, committed and loyal project teams have always proved themselves to be the asset to the companies. Impeccable blends of personnel with subject matter experts (SMEs), project managers, team lead ensure the companies a competitive advantage in the market. Transformational leadership, cohesiveness, perpetual sharing of information helps each individual in one hand, on the other, stiff competition among group members, organizational politics always engenders grievance and conflict resulting in poor organizational performance. The exploratory study aimed to understand the impact of project team over employee appreciation, task autonomy of the organization and sequentially their comprehensive effect on employee Engagement. Empowerment in decision making, team reward schemes has shown a positive influence on team effectiveness. The research study has been conducted to understand the role of team, on employee Engagement mediated through the innovation appreciating organizational culture.

Keywords


Team Effectiveness, Empowerment Agreement, Innovation.

References