Drishtikon: A Management Journal

Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription Access
Open Access Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Restricted Access Subscription Access

The Employee Perspective in Lean Environment


Affiliations
1 Army Institute of Management Kolkata Judges Court Road, Alipore, Kolkata – 700027, India
     

   Subscribe/Renew Journal


Lean approach focuses on elimination of wastes by continuously identifying slacks and removing them. From Human Resource Management perspective, unutilized work time and excess workers are considered as slacks. Increasing worker utilization and downsizing usually lead to reduced manufacturing costs. Lack of job security coupled with the need to accomplish more with less people constitutes a source of employee stress in lean enterprises. Increasing worker utilization is a short term solution to improve productivity but at the cost of welfare of the workers. This will eventually negatively affect the capability of an organization to innovate, which is harmful for the organization in the long run. An attempt has been made in this paper to develop an effective solution to this problem by suggesting a framework to identify the deficiencies existing in the current system so as to improve upon the same and move towards an improved state in the future.
Subscription Login to verify subscription
User
Notifications
Font Size


  • Ahmed, P. and Kaushik, M. D. 2011. Career Planning – An Imperative for Employee Performance Management System, International Journal of Business Insights and Transformation, 4(2):102-109.

  • Arnheiter, E. D. and Maleyeff, J. 2005. Research & Concepts: The Integration of Lean Management and Six Sigma. The TQM Magazine, 17(1): 5-18.

  • Badawy, M. K. 2007. Managing Human Resources. Research - Technology Management, 50(4): 56-74.

  • Bhasin, S. 2006. Lean viewed as a Philosophy. Journal of Manufacturing Technology, 17(1): 56-72.

  • Blanchard, K. H., Carlos, J. P. and Randolph, A. 1996. Empowerment Takes More than a Minute. San Francisco: Berrett-Koehler.

  • Brief, A. P. 1998. Attitudes In and Around Organizations. Thousand Oakes, CA: Sage Publications.

  • Cranny, C. J., Smith, P. C. and Stone, E. F. 1992. Job Satisfaction: How People Feel about their Jobs and How it Affects their Performance. In: Weiss, H. M. 2002. Deconstructing Job Satisfaction: Separating Evaluations, Beliefs and Affective Experiences. Human Resource Management Review, 12: 174-175.

  • de Menezes, L. M., Wood, S. and Gelade, G. 2010. The integration of human resource and operation management practices and its link with performance: A longitudinal latent class study. Journal of Operations Management, 28(6): 455-471.

  • Greene, B. M. 2002. A Taxonomy of the Adoption of Lean Production Tools and Techniques. Ph.D. Thesis. The University of Tennessee, Knoxville.

  • Hackman, J. R. and Oldham, G. R. 1976. Motivation through the design of work: Test of a Theory. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 16:250-279.

  • Hines, P., Holweg, M. and Rich, N. 2004. Learning to Evolve: A Review of Contemporary Lean Thinking. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 24(10): 994-1011.

  • Hines, P. and Rich, N. 1997. The Seven Value Stream Mapping Tools. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 17(1): 46-64.

  • Julien, M., Somerville, K. and Culp, N. 2011. Going Beyond the Work Arrangement: The Crucial Role of Supervisor Support, Public Administration Quarterly, 35(2): 167-204.

  • Kenexa. 2007. Kenexa Research Institute, July 25.

  • Kim, N. 2005. Organizational Interventions Influencing Employee Career Development Preferred by Different Career Success Orientations, International Journal of Training and Development, 9(1): 47-61.

  • Linstone, H. and Turoff, M. 1975. The Delphi Method: Techniques and Applications. London: Addison-Wesley.

  • Locke, E. A. 1976. The Nature and Causes of Job Satisfaction In: Brief, A. P. and Weiss, H. M. 2001. Organizational Behavior: Affect in the Workplace. Annual Review of Psychology, (53): 279-307.

  • MacCarthy, B. L. and Atthirawong, W. 2003. Factors Affecting Location Decisions in International Operations: A Delphi Study. International Journal of Operations and Production Management, 23(7): 794.

  • Minter, S. 2010. Measuring The Success of Lean. Industry Week, 259(2): 32-35.

  • Mount, M., Ilies, R. and Johnson, E. 2006. Relationship of Personality Traits and Counterproductive Work Behaviors: The Mediating Effects of Job Satisfaction. Personnel Psychology, 59: 591-622.

  • Organ, D. W. and Ryan, K. 1995. A Meta-Analytic Review of Attitudinal and Dispositional Predictors of Organizational Citizenship Behavior. Personnel Psychology, 48: 775-802.

  • Pettersen, J. 2009. Defining Lean Production: Some Conceptual and Practical Issues. The TQM Journal, 21(2): 127-142.

  • Roberts, Z. 2008. Elegantly Wasted. People Management, 14 (16): 28-30.

  • Rohleder, K. 2009. Human Machines in the Lean Enterprise. Paperboard Packaging, 94(3): 6-6.

  • Saari, L. M. and Judge, T. A. 2004. Employee Attitudes and Job Satisfaction. Human Resource Management, 43: 395-407.

  • Saaty, T. L. 1994. The Analytical Hierarchy Process. 2nd Edition, New York: McGraw-Hill.

  • The International Ergonomics Association. In http://iea.cc/01_What is Ergonomics.html / last updated on 31.08.2011 / last accessed on 12.12.2011.

  • Watson, J. L. 2006. Integrating Lean Manufacturing with Technology: Analyzing the Effects on Organizational Performance in Terms of Quality, Cost and Response Time. Ph.D. Thesis. Capella University.

  • Wegge, J., Schmidt, K., Parkes, C., and van Dick, K. 2007. ‘Taking a Sickie’: Job Satisfaction and Job Involvement as Interactive Predictors of Absenteeism in a Public Organization. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 80: 77-89.

  • Womack, J. P., Jones, D. T. and Roos D. 1990. The Machine that Changed the World: The Story of Lean Production – Toyota’s Secret Weapon in the Global Car Wars that is Revolutionizing World Industry, New York: Free Press, Simon & Schauster.

  • Worley, J. M. and Doolen T. L. 2006. The Role of Communication and Management Support in a Lean Manufacturing Implementation. Management Decision, 44(2): 228-245.


Abstract Views: 355

PDF Views: 2




  • The Employee Perspective in Lean Environment

Abstract Views: 355  |  PDF Views: 2

Authors

Protik Basu
Army Institute of Management Kolkata Judges Court Road, Alipore, Kolkata – 700027, India
Parveen Ahmed
Army Institute of Management Kolkata Judges Court Road, Alipore, Kolkata – 700027, India

Abstract


Lean approach focuses on elimination of wastes by continuously identifying slacks and removing them. From Human Resource Management perspective, unutilized work time and excess workers are considered as slacks. Increasing worker utilization and downsizing usually lead to reduced manufacturing costs. Lack of job security coupled with the need to accomplish more with less people constitutes a source of employee stress in lean enterprises. Increasing worker utilization is a short term solution to improve productivity but at the cost of welfare of the workers. This will eventually negatively affect the capability of an organization to innovate, which is harmful for the organization in the long run. An attempt has been made in this paper to develop an effective solution to this problem by suggesting a framework to identify the deficiencies existing in the current system so as to improve upon the same and move towards an improved state in the future.

References