Drishtikon: A Management Journal

Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription Access
Open Access Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Restricted Access Subscription Access

Exploring Dependent Relationship of Teachers' Motivation on Quality of Teaching


Affiliations
1 Professor, Faculty of Management Studies, Banaras Hindu University, India
2 Research Scholar Faculty of Management Studies Banaras Hindu University, India
     

   Subscribe/Renew Journal


Management education largely evolved in west and was extended in INDIA. Management Education in India has experienced a paradigm shift in the recent past. Proliferation of management institutions in recent past were majorly through private capital. The dynamics of the business environment brought about many changes in the priorities of these management institutions. These structural changes led to many of the issues. Prime Ministers Knowledge Commission brought about the issue of unemployability of the work force and considered it to be a serious issue requiring immediate attention. Another issue that came to the fore was the issue of Quality of Education in management institutions. Quality of Teaching in Management institutions has always been on the priority list of the government. A lot of concern from time to time has been raised from various forums including the Parliament on Quality of Teaching in Management institutions. Several reports have been published to study, analyze and comment on the state of management education in the country. Nanda Committee (1981), Kurien Committee (1992), Ishwar Dayal Committee (2001), Management Education Review Committee (2003), National Knowledge Commission (2007), Prof Yashpal Committee Report on Higher Education(2009), were few to highlight various issues related with quality of management education in the country.The paper demonstrates the signifcance of quality especially from the students' perspective. It attempts to quantitatively evaluate the level of teachers' motivation in management institutions. It also brings to fore the quality of teaching that prevails in these institutions and assesses the impact of former factor on the latter one.
Subscription Login to verify subscription
User
Notifications
Font Size


  • Barnett, R. (1992). Improving Higher Education: Total Quality Care. Buckingham: Society for Research in Higher Education and Open University Press.

  • Campbell, W. E. & Smith, K. A. (1997). New Paradigms for College Teaching. Edina, Minn.: Interaction Book Company.

  • Downey, R. G. & Cashin, W. E. (1992). Using global student rating items for summative evaluation. Journal of Educational Psychology, 84(4), 563-72.

  • Emery, C. R., Kramer, T. R. & Tian, R. G. (2003). Return to academic standards: A critique of teaching effectiveness. Quality Assurance in Education, 11(1), 37-46.

  • Enders, J., File, J., Huisman, J. & Westerheijden, D. (2005). The European higher education and research landscape. Scenarios and Strategic Debates. Enschede: CHEPS.

  • Harvey, L., Green, H. & Burrows, A. (1993). Assessing quality in higher education: A transbinary research project. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 18(2), 143-148.

  • Hill, F. M. & Taylor, W. A. (1992). Implementing TQM in higher education. International Journal of Educational Management, 6(4), 4-10.

  • Johnson, R. T., Johnson, D. W. & Smith, K. A. (1998). Active Learning: Cooperation in the College Classroom (2nded.). Edina, Minn.: Interaction Press.

  • Marsh, H. W. & Roche, L. A. (1997). Making students’ evaluation teaching effectiveness effective: The critical issues of validity, bias and utility. American Psychologist, 52(11), 1187-1197.

  • McKeachie, W. (1999). Teaching Tips (10thed.) Boston: Houghton Miffin.

  • McKeachie, W. J. (1979). Student ratings of faculty: A reprise. Academe, 65, 384-397.

  • McKeachie, W. J. (1994). Teaching Tips: Strategies, Research, and Theory for College and UniversityfTeachers (9thed.). Lexington, MA: D. C. Heath.

  • McKeachie, W. J. (1997). Student ratings: The validity of use. American Psychologist, 52(11), 1218-1225.

  • Middlehurst, R. (1992). Quality: An organising principle for higher education? Higher Education Quarterly, 46(1), 20-38.

  • Mohanty, R. P. & Behera, A. K. (1996). TQM in the service sector. Work Study, 45(3), 13-17.

  • Neave, G. (1988). On the cultivation of quality, effciency and enterprise: An overview of recent trends in higher education in Western Europe, 1986-1988. European Journal of Education, 23(1/2), 7-23.

  • Neave, G. (1994). The politics of quality: Developments in higher education in Western Europe 1992-1994. European Journal of Education, 29(2), 115-134.

  • Seldin, P. (1999a). Current Practices - Good and Bad - Nationally. In: P. Seldin and Assoc, (Ed.), Changing Practices in Evaluating Teaching. Boston, MA: Anker Publishing Company.

  • Taylor, S. A. (1994). Distinguishing service quality from patient satisfaction in developing health care marketing strategies. Hospital & Health Service Administration, 39, 221-36.

  • Taylor, W. A. & Hill, F. M. (1992). Implementing TQM in higher education. International Journal of Educational Management, 5(5), 4-9.

  • Theall, M. & Franklin, J. L. (1990). Student ratings of instruction: Issues for improving practice (Eds.). New Directions for Teaching and Learning #43. San Francisco: Jossey Bass.

  • US Department of Education. (1991). Assessing teaching performance. The Department Chair: A Newsletter for Academic Administrators, 2(3), 2.

  • Westerheijden, D. F. (1990). Peers, performance, and power: Quality assessment in the Netherlands. In Goedegebuure, L. C. J., Maassen, P.

  • A. M. & Westerheijden, D. F. (Eds.), Peer Review and Performance Indicators: Quality Assessment in British and Dutch Higher Education (pp. 183-207). Utrecht: Lemma

  • Westerheijden, D. F. (1997). A solid base for decisions: Use of the VSNU research evaluations in Dutch universities. Higher Education, 33(4), 397-413.

  • Witcher, B. (1990). Total Marketing: Total Quality and the Marketing Concept. Quarterly Review of Marketing, 15(2), 1-6.

  • Yorke, M. (1994). The external examiner system-In crisis? Yorke, M. (ed.), External Examining for Capability (pp. 2-4). London: Higher Education Quality Council.

  • Yorke, M. (1995). The Assessment of Higher Order Transferable Skills: A Challenge to Higher Education. M Yorke (ed.), Assessing Capability in Degree and Diploma Programmes (pp. 5-12). Proceedings of a conference held in Liverpool on 8 February 1995. Liverpool: Centre for Higher Education Development, Liverpool John Moores University.

  • Yorke, M. (1997). The skills of graduates: A small enterprise perspective. Capability, 3(1), 27-33.

  • Yorke, M. (1992). Quality in higher education: A conceptualization and some observations on the implementation of a sectoral quality system. Journal of Further and Higher Education, 16(2), 90-104.


Abstract Views: 349

PDF Views: 4




  • Exploring Dependent Relationship of Teachers' Motivation on Quality of Teaching

Abstract Views: 349  |  PDF Views: 4

Authors

Alok Kumar Rai
Professor, Faculty of Management Studies, Banaras Hindu University, India
Medha Srivastava
Research Scholar Faculty of Management Studies Banaras Hindu University, India

Abstract


Management education largely evolved in west and was extended in INDIA. Management Education in India has experienced a paradigm shift in the recent past. Proliferation of management institutions in recent past were majorly through private capital. The dynamics of the business environment brought about many changes in the priorities of these management institutions. These structural changes led to many of the issues. Prime Ministers Knowledge Commission brought about the issue of unemployability of the work force and considered it to be a serious issue requiring immediate attention. Another issue that came to the fore was the issue of Quality of Education in management institutions. Quality of Teaching in Management institutions has always been on the priority list of the government. A lot of concern from time to time has been raised from various forums including the Parliament on Quality of Teaching in Management institutions. Several reports have been published to study, analyze and comment on the state of management education in the country. Nanda Committee (1981), Kurien Committee (1992), Ishwar Dayal Committee (2001), Management Education Review Committee (2003), National Knowledge Commission (2007), Prof Yashpal Committee Report on Higher Education(2009), were few to highlight various issues related with quality of management education in the country.The paper demonstrates the signifcance of quality especially from the students' perspective. It attempts to quantitatively evaluate the level of teachers' motivation in management institutions. It also brings to fore the quality of teaching that prevails in these institutions and assesses the impact of former factor on the latter one.

References