Drishtikon: A Management Journal

Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription Access
Open Access Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Restricted Access Subscription Access

Measuring Investment Importance Perception in Equity Shares: A Scale for Individual Investors


Affiliations
1 Department of Business Administration, Rajagiri College of Social Sciences, Ernakulam, Kerala, India
2 Department of Commerce, University of Kerala, Thriruvananthapuram Kerala, India
     

   Subscribe/Renew Journal


This study focused on developing a scale for measuring Investment Importance Perception in Equity shares (IIPe) of individual investors. Item generation (from equity share investors) and content validity was performed (with expert panel) to gather the initial pool of items for the scale. Exploratory Factor Analysis (EFA) was used for item reduction and for establishing the dimensions of IIPe. Further, Confirmatory Factor Analysis (CFA) was used test the measurement validity. Parameters were estimated with maximum likelihood (ML) through the use of AMOS (version 16). The assumptions for multivariate normality were checked by looking into the skewness and kurtosis value of the individual items of the scale. The chi-square goodness-of-fit test guided evaluation of model fit along with established fit indices such as goodness of fit index (GFI), comparative fit index (CFI), incremental fit index (IFI), standardized ischolar_main mean square residual (SRMR), ischolar_main-mean-square error of approximation (RMSEA) and Akaike Information Criterion (AIC).

Keywords

Investment Importance Perception, Investor Knowledge, Acceptance of Equity Shares (AES), Enduring Importance.
Subscription Login to verify subscription
User
Notifications
Font Size


  • Kline, R. B. (2005). Principles and Prictice of SEM. (2, Ed.) New York: The Guliford Press.

  • Ajzen, I. (1991). The theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50(2).

  • Alba, J. W., & Hutchinson, J. W. (1987). Dimensions of consumer expertise. Journal of Consumer Research, 13(4), 411-454.

  • Bettmann, J. R., & Park, C. W. (1980). Effects of prior knowledge and experience and phase of the choice process on consumer decision processes: A protocol analysis. Journal of Consumer Research, 7(3), 234-248.

  • Bloch, P. H., & Richins, L. M. (1983). A theoretical model for the study of product importance perceptions. Journal of Marketing, 47(3).

  • Brown, T. A. (2006). Confirmatory factor analysis for applied research. New York: The Guilford Press.

  • Brucks, M. (1985). The effects of product knowledge on information search behaviour. Journal of Consumer Research, 12, 1-16.

  • Clarke, K., & Belk, R. (1979). The effects of product involvement and task definition of anticipated consumer effort. Advances in Consumer Research, 313-318.

  • Costello, A., & Osborne, J. (2005). Best practices in exploratory factor analysis: Four recommendations for getting the most from your analysis. Practical Assessment, Research and Evaluation, 10(7).

  • Cox. D. F. (1967). Risk Handling in Consumer Behaviour-An intensive study of two cases.

  • Day, G. S. (1970). Buyer Attitudes and Brand Choice.

  • Harrington, D. (2009). Confirmatory Factor Analysis. United States of America: Oxford University Press.

  • Croy, G., Gerrans, P., & Speelman, C. (2010). The role and relevance of domain knowledge, perceptions of planning importance, and risk tolerance in predicting savings intentions. Journal of Economic Psychology, 31(6), 860-871.

  • Churchill, G. A. (1979). A paradigm for developing better measures of marketing constructs. Journal of Marketing Research, 16, 64-73.

  • Henson, R., & Roberts, J. (2006). Use of exploratory factor analysis in published research: Common errors and some comment on improved practice. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 66, 393-416.

  • Hershey, D. A., Jacobs-Lawson, J. M., McArdle, J. J., & Hamagami, F. (2007). Psychological foundations of financial planning for retirement. Journal of Adult Development, 14, 26-36.

  • Howard. J. A. (1974). The structure of buyer behaviour. The theory of buyer behaviour.

  • Hu, L., & Bentler, P. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling, 6, 1-55.

  • Jacoby, J., Chestnut, R. W., & Fisher, W. A. (1978). A behavioral process approach to information acquisition in non-durable purchasing. Journal of Marketing Research., 15, 532-544.

  • Rossiter, J. R. (2002). The C-OAR-SE procedure for scale development in marketing. International Journal of Research in Marketing, 19, 305-335.

  • Johnson, E. J., & Russo, J. E. (1984). Product familiarity and learning new information. Journal of Consumer Research, 11, 542-50.

  • Kline, R. B. (2005). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling 2nded.. New York: The Guilford Press.

  • Lichtenstein, D. R., Kaufmann, P. J., & Bhagat, S. (1999). Why consumer choose managed funds over index funds: Hypothesis from consumer behaviour. The Journal of Consumer Affairs, 33(1), 187-205.

  • Maheswaran, D., Sternthal, B., & Gurhan, Z. (1996). Impact and acquisition of consumer expertise. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 5(2), 115-233.

  • McGuire, W. J. (1989). The structure of individual attitudes and attitude systems. In Attitude structure and function (pp. 37-69).

  • Mishra S. J., & Kumar, M. (2011). How product importance perception, need for cognition and enduring involvement influence investors' knowledge of investment products? Journal of Modern Accounting and Auditing, 7(9), 920-933.

  • Mitchell, A., & Dacin, P. A. (1996). The assessment of alternative measures of consumer expertise. Journal of Consumer Research, 23, 219-239.

  • Golafshani, N. (2003). Understanding reliability and validity in qualitative research. The Qualitative Report, 8(4).

  • Cabrera-Nguyen, P. (2010). Author guidelines for reporting scale development and validation results. Journal of the Society for Social Work and Research, 1(2), 99-103.

  • Schie, R. V., Donkers, B., & Dellaert, B. G. C. (2012). Savings adequacy uncertainty: Driver or obstacle to increased pension contributions? Journal of Economic Psychology, 33(4), 882-896.

  • Mishra, S. K., & Kumar, M. (2011). How product importance perception, need for cognition and enduring involvement influence investors' knowledge of investment products? Journal of Modern Accounting and Auditing, 7(9), 920-33.

  • Schwarz, N. (1999). Self-reports: How questions shape the answers. American Psychologist, 54(2), 93-105.

  • Tabachnick, B. G., & Fidell, L. (2007). Using Multivariate Statistics. 5thed. Boston: Allyn and Bacon.

  • Worthington, R., & Whittaker, T. (2006). Scale development research: A content analysis and recommendations for best practices. Counseling Psychologist, 34, 806-838.


Abstract Views: 379

PDF Views: 2




  • Measuring Investment Importance Perception in Equity Shares: A Scale for Individual Investors

Abstract Views: 379  |  PDF Views: 2

Authors

M. Rakesh Krishnan
Department of Business Administration, Rajagiri College of Social Sciences, Ernakulam, Kerala, India
C. Ganesh
Department of Commerce, University of Kerala, Thriruvananthapuram Kerala, India

Abstract


This study focused on developing a scale for measuring Investment Importance Perception in Equity shares (IIPe) of individual investors. Item generation (from equity share investors) and content validity was performed (with expert panel) to gather the initial pool of items for the scale. Exploratory Factor Analysis (EFA) was used for item reduction and for establishing the dimensions of IIPe. Further, Confirmatory Factor Analysis (CFA) was used test the measurement validity. Parameters were estimated with maximum likelihood (ML) through the use of AMOS (version 16). The assumptions for multivariate normality were checked by looking into the skewness and kurtosis value of the individual items of the scale. The chi-square goodness-of-fit test guided evaluation of model fit along with established fit indices such as goodness of fit index (GFI), comparative fit index (CFI), incremental fit index (IFI), standardized ischolar_main mean square residual (SRMR), ischolar_main-mean-square error of approximation (RMSEA) and Akaike Information Criterion (AIC).

Keywords


Investment Importance Perception, Investor Knowledge, Acceptance of Equity Shares (AES), Enduring Importance.

References