Drishtikon: A Management Journal

Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription Access
Open Access Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Restricted Access Subscription Access

Enhancing the Job Satisfaction Level through Dimensions of Employee Engagement:An Empirical Study on Private Sector Bank Managers


Affiliations
1 Galgotias University, Greater Noida, Gautam Buddh Nagar, Uttar Pradesh, India
     

   Subscribe/Renew Journal


Purpose: The purpose of the study is to analyse how the of job satisfaction level can be enhanced through employee engagement and its dimensions namely, vigour, dedication and absorption. Augmenting the job satisfaction levels can increase the employee retention in organizations. Research has proved that engaged employees can act as competitive advantage for organizations and creates quality workforce that is fully committed.

Methodology: The study was administered on 96 Managers who were representatives of 4 private sector banks in Delhi/NCR. Variables in the study were assessed using validated instruments. Descriptive Statistics, Correlation and Regression were used for data analysis.

Implications: Indian private banking sector has undergone incredible change in the last few decades. Due to enormously competitive scenario; it is relevant to note that banks need to distinguish themselves from each other. Enough research has been on the concept of employee engagement and its vitality to employee's wellbeing, but there is limited research on employee engagement dimensions and relation between job satisfaction. The current research is imperative in providing insights into relation between employee engagement dimensions and its impact on job satisfaction levels.


Keywords

Job Satisfaction, Employee Engagement, Vigour, Dedication, Absorption Private Sector Banks.
Subscription Login to verify subscription
User
Notifications
Font Size


  • Abraham, S. (2012). Job satisfaction as an antecedent to employee engagement. SIES Journal of Management, 8(2), 27-36.

  • ADP Research Institute, U.S. (2012). Employee satisfaction vs. employee engagement: Are They the Same Thing? U.S.: ADP Research Institute.

  • Al-Ajmi, R. (2001). The effect of personal characteristics on job satisfaction: A study among male managers in the kuwaiti oil industry. International Journal of Commerce and Management, 11, 91-110.

  • ALARCON, G. M., & LYONS, J. B. (2011). The relationship of engagement and job satisfaction in working samples. The Journal of Psychology, 145(5), 463-480.

  • Asadi, A. F. (2008). Personal characteristics affecting agricultural extension workers’ job satisfaction level. Journal of Social Sciences, 4(4), 246-250.

  • Bakker, A., & Leiter, M. (2010). Work engagement: The essential theory and research. Psychology Press.

  • Baumruk, R. (2004). The missing link: the role of employee engagement in business success. Workspan, 47, 48-52.

  • Brief, A. P. (1998). Attitudes in and around organizations. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

  • Brief, A. P., & Weiss, H. M. (2002). Organizational behavior: Affect in the workplace. Annual Review of Psychology, 53, 279-307.

  • Britt, T. W., Dickinson, J. M., Greene, T. M., & McKibben, E. (2007). Self engagement at work. To appear in C. L. Cooper & D. Nelson (Eds.), Positive organizational behavior: Accentuating the positive at work. Sage: Thousand Oaks, CA.

  • Chaudhary, R., Rangnekar, S., & Barua, K. M. (2013). Engaged versus disengaged: The role of occupational self-efficacy. Asian Academy of Management Journal, 18(1), 91–108.

  • Clark, E. A. (1996). Job satisfaction in Britain. British Journal of Industrial Relations, 34(2), 189–217.

  • Crouch, A., & Nimran, U. (February 1989). Office design and the behavior of senior managers. Human Relations, 42( 2), 139-155.

  • Demerouti, E., Bakker, A. B., Nachreiner, F., & Schaufeli, W. B. (2001). The job demands-resources model of burnout. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86, 499-512.

  • Demerouti, E., Bakker, A., Janssen, P., & Schaufeli, W. (2001). Burnout and engagement at work as a function of demands and control. Scandinavian Journal of Work, Environment & Health, 27, 279-286.

  • Dodd-McCue, D., & Wright, G. (1996). Men, Women, and Attitudinal Commitment: The Effects of Workplace Experiences and Socialization. Human Relations, ,49, 1065-109l.

  • Falcon, S. (1991). Self-assessment and job satisfaction in public and private organizations. Productivity and Management Review, 16, 385-396.

  • Fishbein, M., & Ajzen, I. (1975). Belief, attitude, intention and behaviour: An introduction to theory and research. Reading, Mass: Addison Wesley.

  • G, S. (1998). Employed mothers: Job satisfaction and self-Esteem. Canadian Journal of Counselling, 32(3), 242-258.

  • Gallup Consulting. (2010). Employee engagement: What’s your engagement ratio? Washington D.C.: Gallup World Consulting Group.

  • Gazioglu, S., & Tansel, A. (2006). Job Satisfaction in Britain: Individual and job related factors. Applied Economics, 38, 1163–1171.

  • Gopal, A. (October 2003). Disengaged employees cost Singapore $4.9 billion. Gallup Management Journal.

  • Hallberg, U. E., & Schaufeli, W. B. (2006). “Same, same, but different”? Can work engagement be empirically separated from job involvement and organizational commitment? . European Psychologist, 11, 119-127.

  • Harter, J. K., Schmidt, F. L., & Hayes, T. L. (April 2002). Business-unitlevel relationship between employee satisfaction,employee engagement and business outcomes: A meta-analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87(2), 268-279.

  • Harter, J. K., Schmidt, F. L., & Keyes, C. L. (2002). Wellbeing the workplace and its relationship to business outcomes: A review of the Gallup studies. In. C. L. Keyes & J. Haidt (Eds.), Flourishing: The Positive Person and the Good Life. Washington D.C.: American Psychological Association, 205-224.

  • Herzberg, F. (1966). Work and the nature of man. Cleveland, OH: World Publishing.

  • Herzberg, F., Mausner, B., & Snyderman, B. (1959). In The motivation to work. NewYork: John Wiley and Sons.

  • Hobfoll, S. (1989). Conservation of resources: A new attempt at conceptualizing stress. American Psychologist, 44, 513–524.

  • Igbaria, M., & Greenhaus, J. (February 1992). Determinants of MIS employee’s turnover intentions: A structural equation model. Communications of the ACM, 34-49.

  • Kong, Y. (2009). A study on the job engagement of company employees. International Journal of Psychological Studies, 1(2), 65-68.

  • Linda, T. T., & Daniel, C. G. (1995). Impact of family-supportive work variables on work- family conflict and strain: A control perspective. Journal of Applied Psychology, 80(1), 6-15.

  • Macey, W. H., & Schneider, B. (2008). The meaning of employee engagement. Industrial and Organizational Psychology: Perspectives on Science and Practice, 1, 3-30.

  • Macklin, D., Smith, L., & Dollard, M. (2006). Public and private sector work stress: Workers compensation, levels of distress and the demand-control-support model. Australian Journal of Psychology, 58(3), 130-143.

  • Maslach, C., & Goldberg, J. (1998). Prevention of burnout: New perspectives. Applied and Preventive Psychology, 7, 63-74.

  • Maslach, C., Schaufeli, W., & Leiter, M. (2001). Job burnout. Annual Review of Psychology, 52, 397-422.

  • Moore, J. E. (2000). One road to turnover: An examination of work exhaustion in technology professionals, MIS Quarterly, 24(1), 141-168.

  • ORGAN, D. W., & RYAN, K. (1995). A meta-analytic review of attitudinal and dispositional predictors of organizational citizenship behavior. Personnel Psychology, 775-802.

  • Organ, D., & Near, J. P. (1985). Cognition versus affect in measures of job satisfaction. International Journal of Psychology, 20, 241-253.

  • P.M.S.P. Yapa, Rathnayake, R. M., Senanayake, G., & Premakumara, P. (February 2014). Effect of demographic factors on job satisfaction of non-academic staff in universities. Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Management and Economics, (February 2014). Oral Presentations (pp. pp. 303-310). Sri Lanka: Faculty of Management and Finance, University of Ruhuna. ISBN 978-955-1507-30-5.

  • Pierce, J. L., & Newstrom, J. W. (1982). Employee responses to flexible work schedules: An inter-organization, inter-system comparison. Journal of Management, 8(1), 9-25.

  • Ralston, S. M. (1989). An exploratory test of the contingency approach to recruitment interview decisions. The Journal of Business Communication, 26, 347-362.

  • Rashid, H. A., Asad, A., & Ashraf, M. M. (2011). Factor’s persuading employee engagement and linkage of ee to personal and organizational performance. Interdisciplinary Journal of Contemporary Research in Business, 3(5), 3(5), 98-108.

  • Rick Blizzard, D. B. A. (2004). Engagement vs. satisfaction among hospital teams. The Gallup Organization, Princeton, NJ.

  • Saks, A. (2006). Antecedents and consequences of employee engagement. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 21, 600-619.

  • Salanova, M., & Schaufeli, W. ( January 2008). A cross-national study of work engagement as a mediator between job resources and proactive behaviour. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 19(1), 116–131.

  • Salanova, M., Agut, S., & Pieró, J. (2005). Linking Organizational Facilitators and Work Engagement to Extrarole Performance and Customer Loyalty: The Mediating Role of Service Climate. Journal of Applied Psychology, Vol. 90, No. 6, 1217–1227.

  • Salanova, M., Schaufeli, W., Llorens, S., Pieró, J., & Grau, R. (2001). From Burnout to Engagement: A New Persepctive. Revista de Psicología del Trabajo y de las Organizaciones, 16, 117-134.

  • Sanchez, P., & McCauley, D. (Nov/Dec2006). Measuring and managing engagement in a cross-cultural Workforce: New insights for global companies. Global Business & Organizational Excellence, 26(1), 41-50.

  • Sange, R. & Srivasatava, R. K. (2012). Employee engagement and mentoring: An Empirical study of sales professionals. Synergy (09738819), 10(1), 37-50.

  • Schaufeli, W., & Bakker, A. (2003). Utrecht work engagement scale. Occupational Health Psychology Unit , Utrecht University.

  • Schaufeli, W., & Bakker, A. (2004). Job demands, job resources, and their relationship with burnout and engagement: A multi-sample study. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 25, 293-315.

  • Schaufeli, W., Martanez, I., Marques Pinto, A., Salanova, M., & Bakker, A. (2002). Burnout and engagement in university students: A crossnational study. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 33, 464-481.

  • Schaufeli, W., Salanova, M., Gonzalez-Roma, V., & Bakker, A. (2002). The measurement of burnout and engagement: A confirmatory factor analytic approach. Journal of Happiness Studies, 3, 71-92.

  • Shirom, A. (2003). Feeling vigorous at work? The construct of vigor and the study of positive affect in organizations. In D. Ganster & P. L. Perrewe (Eds.). Research in organizational stress and well-being, 3, 135-165.

  • Sonnentag, S. (2003). Recovery, work engagement, and proactive behavior: a new look at the interface between non-work and work. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88, 518-528.

  • Spector, P. (1997). Job satisfaction: Application, assessment, causes and consequences. Sage, California .

  • Spector, P. E. (1985). Measurement of human service staff satisfaction: Development of the job satisfaction survey. American Journal of Community Psychology, 13(6), 693-713.

  • Durgin, T. (2007). The Yowers Perrin 2007-2008 global workforce study: Insights to drive growth. Human Capital Institute, Towers Perrin.

  • Perrin, T. (2003). Working today: Understanding what drives- the 2003 towers perrin talent report. Towers Perrin, U.S.

  • Wah, L. (1999). Engaging employees a big challenge. Management Review, 88(9), 10.

  • Wegge, J., Schmidt, K.-H., Parkes, C., & Dick, R. V. (2007). Taking a sickie: Job satisfaction and job involvement as interactive predictors of absenteeism in a public organization. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 80, 77-89.

  • Weiss, H. M. (2002). Deconstructing job satisfaction: Separating evaluations, beliefs, affective experiences. Human Resource Management Review, 12, 173-194.


Abstract Views: 448

PDF Views: 0




  • Enhancing the Job Satisfaction Level through Dimensions of Employee Engagement:An Empirical Study on Private Sector Bank Managers

Abstract Views: 448  |  PDF Views: 0

Authors

Poornima Tejpal
Galgotias University, Greater Noida, Gautam Buddh Nagar, Uttar Pradesh, India

Abstract


Purpose: The purpose of the study is to analyse how the of job satisfaction level can be enhanced through employee engagement and its dimensions namely, vigour, dedication and absorption. Augmenting the job satisfaction levels can increase the employee retention in organizations. Research has proved that engaged employees can act as competitive advantage for organizations and creates quality workforce that is fully committed.

Methodology: The study was administered on 96 Managers who were representatives of 4 private sector banks in Delhi/NCR. Variables in the study were assessed using validated instruments. Descriptive Statistics, Correlation and Regression were used for data analysis.

Implications: Indian private banking sector has undergone incredible change in the last few decades. Due to enormously competitive scenario; it is relevant to note that banks need to distinguish themselves from each other. Enough research has been on the concept of employee engagement and its vitality to employee's wellbeing, but there is limited research on employee engagement dimensions and relation between job satisfaction. The current research is imperative in providing insights into relation between employee engagement dimensions and its impact on job satisfaction levels.


Keywords


Job Satisfaction, Employee Engagement, Vigour, Dedication, Absorption Private Sector Banks.

References