Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription Access

Comparison of Decision Tree and SVM Methods in Classification of Researcher's Cognitive Styles in Academic Environment


Affiliations
1 Faculty of Computer Science and Information Systems, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia-81300, Skudai, Malaysia
 

Recently, by development of internet, it is user's right to achieve the best answer based on what they demand. Also, classification is the task which is essential in data mining. Nowadays, there are many classification techniques to eliminate the classification problems such as Decision tree, SVM, Genetic Algorithm, Bayesian and others. In this paper, the researchers are classified to "Expert" and "Novice" based on cognitive style factors to have the best practicable answers. Academic environment has been chosen as a domain of this research. An important aim of this research is to classify the researchers based on Decision tree and Support Vector Machine techniques and finally according to the highest accuracy, choose the best technique to help the researchers to have the best answer based on their request in digital libraries.

Keywords

Data Mining, Classification, Cognitive Styles, Decision Tree, SVM, Academic Environment
User
Notifications

  • Hamidah Jantan, Abdul RazakHamdan and ZulaihaAliOthman (2009) Classification for Talent Management Using Decision Tree Induction Techniques.Science And Technology.
  • Jayanthi Ranjan (2008) Data Mining Techniques for better decisions in Human Resource Management Systems.International Journal of Business Information Systems.
  • Chen-FuChien and Li-FeiChen (2008) Data mining to improve personnel selection and enhance human capital: A case study in high-technology industry,. Expert Systems and Applications.
  • Jiawei Han and Micheline Kamber (2006) Data Mining: Concepts and Techniques
  • Abdelhalim Amany and TraoreIssa (2009) A new method for learning decision trees from rules. In the Eighth International Conference on Machine Learning and Applications (ICMLA’09), Miami, Florida, USA, December.
  • Daniel T.Larose (2005) An Introduction to Data Mining. A JOHN WILEY & SONS, INC., publications.
  • Leo Breiman, Jerome Friedman, RA Olshen and CJ Stone (1984) Classification and regression trees. Monterey, CA: Wadsworth & Brooks/Cole Advanced Books & Software.
  • Vladimir N. Vapnik (1998) Statistical Learning Theory. Wiley, New York.
  • Kristian Woodsend and Jacek danGondzio (2009) Hybrid MPI/OpenMP Parallel Linear Support Vector Machine Training. Journal of Machine Learning Research.
  • Hua Li and danYongXin Zhang (2009) An algorithm of soft fault diagnosis for analog circuit based on the optimized SVM by GA. Electronic Measurement & Instruments.ICEMI ‘09.9th International Conference.
  • Yuguo Wang (2008) A Tree-Based Multi-class SVM Classifier for Digital Library Document. In international conference on MultiMedia and Information Technology.
  • Dustin Boswell (2002) Introduction to Support Vector Machines.
  • Jae H Min and Young-chan dan Lee (2003) Bankruptcy prediction using support vector machine with optimal choice of kernel function parameters. Expert Systems with Applications.
  • David Meyer (2011) Support Vector Machines.
  • Corinna Cortes and Vladimir N. Vapnik (1995) Support-Vector Networks.New York.
  • Arun Kumar and Madan Gopal (2010) A hybrid SVM based decision tree. Pattern Recognition 43(12): 3977-3987.
  • Nigel Ford, T.D.Wilson, Allen Foster, David Ellis and Amanda Spink (2002) Information Seeking and Mediated Searching. Part 4 Cognitive Styles in Information Seeking.Journal of the American Society for Information Science. 2002;53(April):728 -735.
  • Nigel Ford, Frances Wood and Chiristina Walsh (1994) Cognitive styles and searching. On-line & CDROM Review.
  • Amanda Spink, T.D.Wilson, Nigel Ford, Allen Foster and David Ellis (2002) Information-Seeking and Mediated Searching . Part 1 .Theoretical Framework and Research Design. Journal of the American Society for Information Science.
  • Zheng Enhui, Li Ping and Zhihuan Song (2004) Performance analysis and comparison of neural networks and support vector machines classifier. in Intelligent Control and Automation.

Abstract Views: 577

PDF Views: 419




  • Comparison of Decision Tree and SVM Methods in Classification of Researcher's Cognitive Styles in Academic Environment

Abstract Views: 577  |  PDF Views: 419

Authors

Z. Nematzadeh Balagatabi
Faculty of Computer Science and Information Systems, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia-81300, Skudai, Malaysia
H. Nematzadeh Balagatabi
Faculty of Computer Science and Information Systems, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia-81300, Skudai, Malaysia

Abstract


Recently, by development of internet, it is user's right to achieve the best answer based on what they demand. Also, classification is the task which is essential in data mining. Nowadays, there are many classification techniques to eliminate the classification problems such as Decision tree, SVM, Genetic Algorithm, Bayesian and others. In this paper, the researchers are classified to "Expert" and "Novice" based on cognitive style factors to have the best practicable answers. Academic environment has been chosen as a domain of this research. An important aim of this research is to classify the researchers based on Decision tree and Support Vector Machine techniques and finally according to the highest accuracy, choose the best technique to help the researchers to have the best answer based on their request in digital libraries.

Keywords


Data Mining, Classification, Cognitive Styles, Decision Tree, SVM, Academic Environment

References