Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription Access

Performance Comparison of Low-Voltage non-Ionic Gel Organic Field Effect Transistors with Gold and PEDOT:PSS Gate Electrodes


Affiliations
1 Scientific and Technological Center, Düzce University, Düzce, Turkey
2 Department of Computer Engineering, Düzce University Technology Faculty, Düzce, Turkey
3 Department of Polymer Engineering, Düzce University Technology Faculty, Düzce, Turkey
4 Department of Chemistry, Düzce University Faculty of Arts and Sciences, Düzce,Turkey
5 Department of Physics, Muş Alparslan University Faculty of Arts and Sciences, Muş, Turkey
 

Low-voltage non-ionic gel organic-field effect transistors (NIGOFETs) with two kinds of gate electrode materials namely gold (Au) and poly(3,4-ethylenedioxythiophene) polystyrene sulfonate (PEDOT:PSS) formulation were fabricated in top-gate bottom-contact geometry to investigate the effects of gate electrodes on the electrical performance of the OFETs. In addition, three kinds of gate dielectrics were used for both types of transistors to understand the effects more thoroughly. As a result, it can be deduced from the data that NIGOFETs with Au gate electrodes (Au-NIGOFETs) display better performance considering higher mobility and on-to-off current ratio (ION/IOFF) as well as lower Subthreshold Swing (SS) of them. Besides, the threshold voltage (VTH) effects-free drain currents (IDS) of the Au-NIGOFETs surpasses those of the PEDOT:PSS formulation gated NIGOFETs (Pedot-NIGOFETs). This is probably due to having greater WF gate electrode (in our case Au) provides less injection barrier eventually leads to relatively unimpeded charge transportation. Nevertheless, Au-NIGOFETs interestingly proves to have further negative VTH and lower off-current (IOFF), which may be attributed to lower electrical resistivity (ρ) of the Au leading to denser charge carrier traps formation along with intensified charge carrier induction at the semiconductor-dielectric interface when the gate-to-source voltage (VGS) is less than VTH. However, because of the same reason, when VGS exceeds the VTH for example, IDS of Au-NIFOFET1 starts to increase in such a quick manner that enabling it to have higher ION/IOFF and lower SS.
User
Notifications
Font Size

  • J. Lee, M. J. Panzer, Y. He, T. P. Lodge, and C. D. Frisbie, “Ion Gel Gated Polymer Thin-Film Transistors,” J. Am. Chem. Soc., vol. 129, no. 15, pp. 4532–4533, Apr. 2007.
  • Crossref
  • F. Zare Bidoky and C. D. Frisbie, “Parasitic Capacitance Effect on Dynamic Performance of Aerosol-Jet-Printed Sub 2 V Poly(3-hexylthiophene) Electrolyte-Gated Transistors,” ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces, vol. 8, no. 40, pp. 27012–27017, Oct. 2016.
  • Crossref
  • M. J. Panzer and C. D. Frisbie, “Exploiting Ionic Coupling in Electronic Devices: Electrolyte-Gated Organic Field-Effect Transistors,” Adv. Mater., vol. 20, no. 16, pp. 3177–3180, Aug. 2008.
  • Crossref
  • S. Ono, K. Miwa, S. Seki, and J. Takeya, “A comparative study of organic single-crystal transistors gated with various ionic-liquid electrolytes,” Appl. Phys. Lett., vol. 94, no. 6, p. 063301, Feb. 2009.
  • Crossref
  • B. Yaman, I. Terkesli, K. M. Turksoy, A. Sanyal, and S. Mutlu, “Fabrication of a planar water gated organic field effect transistor using a hydrophilic polythiophene for improved digital inverter performance,” Org. Electron. physics, Mater. Appl., vol. 15, no. 3, pp. 646–653, Mar. 2014.
  • Crossref
  • T. Yardım, A. Demir, S. Allı, A. Allı, A. Kösemen, and A. G. Yüceda, “Comparison of Electronic Parameters of Low Voltage Organic Field-Effect Transistors with Novel Gel Gate Insulators,” J. Nanoelectron. Optoelectron., vol. 14, no. 6, pp. 833–838, May 2019.
  • Crossref
  • Z. Alpaslan Kösemen, A. Kösemen, S. Öztürk, B. Canımkurbey, and Y. Yerlİ, “High mobility and low operation voltage organic field effect transistors by using polymer-gel dielectric and molecular doping,” Mater. Sci. Semicond. Process., vol. 66, pp. 207–211, Aug. 2017.
  • Crossref
  • B. Şengez et al., “Use of side chain thiophene containing copolymer as a non-ionic gel-dielectric material for sandwich OFET assembly,” Microelectron. Eng., vol. 103, pp. 111–117, Mar. 2013.
  • Crossref
  • T. Yardım, İ. Yücedağ, S. Allı, A. Allı, A. Demir, and A. Kösemen, “Comparative investigation of electronic parameters of low voltage organic field-effect transistors with variable capacitance non-ionic gel gate dielectrics,” Microelectron. Eng., vol. 215, 2019.
  • Crossref
  • A. Kösemen et al., “A novel field effect transistor with dielectric polymer gel,” Microelectron. Eng., vol. 88, no. 1, pp. 17–20, Jan. 2011.
  • Crossref
  • F. Leonardi, A. Tamayo, S. Casalini, and M. Mas-Torrent, “Modification of the gate electrode by self-assembled monolayers in flexible electrolyte-gated organic field effect transistors: Work function: Vs. capacitance effects,” RSC Adv., vol. 8, no. 48, pp. 27509–27515, Aug. 2018.
  • Crossref
  • S. Fabiano, S. Braun, M. Fahlman, X. Crispin, and M. Berggren, “Effect of Gate Electrode Work-Function on Source Charge Injection in Electrolyte-Gated Organic Field-Effect Transistors,” Adv. Funct. Mater., vol. 24, no. 5, pp. 695–700, Feb. 2014.
  • Crossref
  • I. Nausieda, K. K. Ryu, D. Da He, A. I. Akinwande, V. Bulović, and C. G. Sodini, “Dual threshold voltage organic thin-film transistor technology,” IEEE Trans. Electron Devices, vol. 57, no. 11, pp. 3027–3032, Nov. 2010.
  • Crossref
  • L. Kergoat et al., “Tuning the threshold voltage in electrolyte-gated organic field-effect transistors,” Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A., vol. 109, no. 22, pp. 8394–8399, May 2012.
  • Crossref
  • Y. Zhou, H. Cheun, S. Choi, C. Fuentes-Hernandez, and B. Kippelen, “Optimization of a polymer top electrode for inverted semitransparent organic solar cells,” Org. Electron. physics, Mater. Appl., vol. 12, no. 5, pp. 827–831, May 2011.
  • Crossref
  • H. Jia, G. K. Pant, E. K. Gross, R. M. Wallace, and B. E. Gnade, “Gate induced leakage and drain current offset in organic thin film transistors,” Org. Electron., vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 16–21, 2006.
  • Crossref
  • I. Kymissis, Organic Field Effect Transistors: Theory, Fabrication and Characterization - Ioannis Kymissis - Google Books. 2009.
  • Crossref
  • W. M. H. Sachtler, G. J. H. Dorgelo, and A. A. Holscher, “The work function of gold,” Surf. Sci., vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 221–229, Oct. 1966.
  • Crossref
  • “PEDOT:PSS | PH 1000, Al 4083, HTL Solar & HTL Solar 3 | Ossila.” Available:
  • Online
  • S. I. Na et al., “Evolution of nanomorphology and anisotropic conductivity in solvent-modified PEDOT:PSS films for polymeric anodes of polymer solar cells,” J. Mater. Chem., vol. 19, no. 47, pp. 9045–9053, 2009.
  • Crossref
  • L. Xiang, W. Wang, and F. Gao, “Improving Mobility and Stability of Organic Field-Effect Transistors by Employing a Tetratetracontane Modifying PMMA Dielectric,” IEEE Trans. Electron Devices, vol. 63, no. 11, pp. 4440–4444, Nov. 2016.
  • Crossref
  • L. Zhang, D. Yang, S. Yang, and B. Zou, “Solution-processed P3HT-based photodetector with field-effect transistor configuration,” Appl. Phys. A Mater. Sci. Process., vol. 116, no. 3, pp. 1511–1516, 2014.
  • Crossref
  • G. Horowitz, R. Hajlaoui, H. Bouchriha, R. Bourguiga, and M. Hajlaoui, “The Concept of ‘Threshold Voltage’ in Organic Field-Effect Transistors,” Adv. Mater., vol. 10, no. 12, pp. 923–927, Aug. 1998.
  • Crossref
  • G. Fortunato and P. Migliorato, “Model for the above-threshold characteristics and threshold voltage in polycrystalline silicon transistors,” J. Appl. Phys., vol. 68, no. 5, pp. 2463–2467, 1990.
  • Crossref
  • D. Braga and G. Horowitz, “Subthreshold regime in rubrene single-crystal organic transistors,” Appl. Phys. A Mater. Sci. Process., vol. 95, no. 1, pp. 193–201, Apr. 2009.
  • Crossref
  • J. R. Sambles, K. C. Elsom, and D. J. Jarvis, “The Electrical Resistivity of Gold Films,” Philos. Trans. R. Soc. A Math. Phys. Eng. Sci., vol. 304, no. 1486, pp. 365–396, Mar. 1982.
  • Crossref
  • O. Günaydın, A. Demir, A. Atahan, T. Yardım, and İ. Yücedağ, “Evaluation of novel thiophene branched polystyrene as insulator layer in organic electronic device,” J. Mol. Struct., vol. 1185, 2019.
  • Crossref
  • R. P. Ortiz, A. Facchetti, and T. J. Marks, “High- k Organic, Inorganic, and Hybrid Dielectrics for Low-Voltage Organic Field-Effect Transistors,” Chem. Rev., vol. 110, no. 1, pp. 205–239, Jan. 2010.

Abstract Views: 161

PDF Views: 93




  • Performance Comparison of Low-Voltage non-Ionic Gel Organic Field Effect Transistors with Gold and PEDOT:PSS Gate Electrodes

Abstract Views: 161  |  PDF Views: 93

Authors

T. Yardım
Scientific and Technological Center, Düzce University, Düzce, Turkey
İ. Yücedağ
Department of Computer Engineering, Düzce University Technology Faculty, Düzce, Turkey
S. Allı
Department of Polymer Engineering, Düzce University Technology Faculty, Düzce, Turkey
A. Allı
Department of Chemistry, Düzce University Faculty of Arts and Sciences, Düzce,Turkey
A. Kösemen
Department of Physics, Muş Alparslan University Faculty of Arts and Sciences, Muş, Turkey

Abstract


Low-voltage non-ionic gel organic-field effect transistors (NIGOFETs) with two kinds of gate electrode materials namely gold (Au) and poly(3,4-ethylenedioxythiophene) polystyrene sulfonate (PEDOT:PSS) formulation were fabricated in top-gate bottom-contact geometry to investigate the effects of gate electrodes on the electrical performance of the OFETs. In addition, three kinds of gate dielectrics were used for both types of transistors to understand the effects more thoroughly. As a result, it can be deduced from the data that NIGOFETs with Au gate electrodes (Au-NIGOFETs) display better performance considering higher mobility and on-to-off current ratio (ION/IOFF) as well as lower Subthreshold Swing (SS) of them. Besides, the threshold voltage (VTH) effects-free drain currents (IDS) of the Au-NIGOFETs surpasses those of the PEDOT:PSS formulation gated NIGOFETs (Pedot-NIGOFETs). This is probably due to having greater WF gate electrode (in our case Au) provides less injection barrier eventually leads to relatively unimpeded charge transportation. Nevertheless, Au-NIGOFETs interestingly proves to have further negative VTH and lower off-current (IOFF), which may be attributed to lower electrical resistivity (ρ) of the Au leading to denser charge carrier traps formation along with intensified charge carrier induction at the semiconductor-dielectric interface when the gate-to-source voltage (VGS) is less than VTH. However, because of the same reason, when VGS exceeds the VTH for example, IDS of Au-NIFOFET1 starts to increase in such a quick manner that enabling it to have higher ION/IOFF and lower SS.

References