Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription Access
Open Access Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Restricted Access Subscription Access

CSR and its Social Implication - Evidence from a Maharatna Company in India


Affiliations
1 Center for Environment and Development, Kolkata, West Bengal, India
2 Professor, Department of Environment Management and Head, Department of Executive Management, Indian Institute of Social Welfare and Business Management, Kolkata, West Bengal, India
     

   Subscribe/Renew Journal


The aim of this paper is to review the status of corporate CSR practices in a large Maharatna company in India, by critically appraising the resource application in the spectrum of focus areas, Schedule VII of the CSR rules, and the consequent impacts. The study focuses on the geographic spread of social investments over a period of time. Finally, the study explores the extent of social implications due to CSR initiatives. For the purpose of the study, we selected IOCL, a major oil and gas company, and the largest corporate identity in India in terms of turnover. The findings showed that through its social development activities, besides major CSR projects, its CSR initiatives have touched millions of lives by providing various infrastructure and grassroots development activities in the focus areas identified in the CSR policy of the company. Provision of water facilities; infrastructure at hospitals, schools, colleges, and skill development institutes/industrial training institutes; and setting up sports facilities across the country were some of the projects undertaken by IOCL. Environment-related initiatives like providing LPG connection to the disadvantaged section of society, improving sanitation, health, and livelihood, and providing livelihood generation skills stand tall among various initiatives undertaken. However, the investments are concentrated in and around the operating area, as per policy, in synchronisation with the prevailing act, thereby creating spatial inequality.

Keywords

Corporate Social Responsibility, Social Issues, Companies Act, Sustainable Development, CSR Initiatives, CSR Investment
Subscription Login to verify subscription
User
Notifications
Font Size


  • Banerjee, B. (2001). Corporate financial reporting practices in India. Indian Journal of Accounting, 33, 1-17.
  • Batra, G. S. (1996). Dynamics of social auditing in corporate enterprises: A study of the Indian corporate sector.Managerial Auditing Journal, 11(2), 36-45.
  • Beurden, P., & Gossling, T. (2008). The worth of values: A literature review on the relation between corporate social and financial performance. Journal of Business Ethics, 82(407).
  • Bowen, H. R. (1953). Social responsibilities of the businessman. New York, Harper and Row.
  • Buldybayeva, G. (2014). Both sides of CSR practice: A case from oil and gas industry in Kazakhstan. Acta Polytechnica Hungarica, 11(2), 229-248.
  • Carroll, A. (1999). Corporate social responsibility: Evolutional of a definitional construct. Business and Society, 38(3), 268-295.
  • Carroll, A., & Shabana, K. (2010). The business case for corporate social responsibility: A review of concepts, research and practice. International Journal of Management Reviews, 12(1), 85-105.
  • Dahlsrud. (2008). How corporate social responsibility is defined: An analysis of 37 definitions. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 15(1), 1-13.
  • Danilovic, M., Hensbergen, M., Hoveskog, M., & Zadayannaya, L. (2015). Exploring diffusion and dynamics of corporate social responsibility. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 22(3), 129-141.
  • Fisher, J. (2004). Social responsibility and ethics: Clarifying the concepts. Journal of Business Ethics, 52(4), 391-400.
  • Frynas, J. G. (2009). Corporate social responsibility in oil & gas sector. The Journal of World Energy Law and Business.
  • Frynas, J. (2012). Corporate social responsibility or government regulation? Evidence on oil spill prevention. Ecology and Society, 17(4).
  • Garriga, E., & Mele, D. (2004). Corporate social responsibility theories: Mapping the territories. Journal of Business Ethics, 53(1-2), 51-71.
  • Ghobadian, A., Money, K., & Hillenband, C. (2015). Corporate responsibility research: Past-present-future.
  • Group & Organization Management, 40(3), 271-294.
  • Ghosh, A. K. (2008). Sustainability and corporate governance. Environmental Conservation Challenges & Actions (pp. 214-225). New Delhi: A.P.H. Publishing Corporation.
  • Global Justice Now. (2016). 10 Biggest Coroporations Make More Money Than Most Countries in the World Combined, Retrieved from globaljustice.org.uk: http:// www.globaljustice.org.uk/sites/default/files/files/ resources/corporations_vs_ governments_final.pdf
  • Godfrey, P. C., & Hatch, N. W. (2007). Regarding corporate social responsibility: An agenda for the 21st Century.Journal of Business Ethics, 70(1), 87-98.
  • Grassel, E., & Schirmer, B. (2006). The use of volunteers to support family careers of dementia patients: Results of prospective longitudinal study investigating exceptions towards and experience with training and professional support. Zeitschrift Fur Gerontologie Und Geriatie, 39(3), 217-226.
  • Gulsecen, A., & Kubat, A. (2006). Teaching ICT to teach candidates using PBL: A qualitative and quantitative evaluation. Education, Technology and Society, 9(2), 96-106.
  • Hyde, K. A. L., Ocitti, J. P., Bua, V. E., & Abagi, O. 1997).Complementary opportunity for primary education programme interim review: Final Report. UNICEF/ Kampala and Ministry of Education, Kampala.
  • Idemudia, U. (2009). Oil extraction and poverty reduction in the Niger Delta: A critical examination of partnership initiatives. Journal of Business Ethics, 90(1), 91-116.
  • Indian Oil Corporation Limited. (2018). Corporate social responsibility. Retrieved from https://www.iocl.com/ AboutUs/IOC_S&CSR_Policy.pdf Indian Oil Corporation Limited. (2017). Financial performance. Retrieved from https://www.iocl.com/ AboutUs/AnnualReports/AnnualReport201516.pdf
  • Indian Oil Corporation Limited. (2015-16). CSR project wise details. Retrieved from https://www.iocl.com/download/ Projectwise%20CSR%20expenditure%20FY%20201516.pdf Indian Oil Corporation Limited. (2014-15). CSR project wise details. Retrieved from https://www.iocl.com/download/ Projectwise%20CSR%20expenditure%20FY%20201415.pdf
  • Indian Oil Corporation Limited. (2013-14). CSR Project Wise Details. Retrieved from https://www.iocl.com/ download/Projectwise%20CSR%20expenditure%20 FY%202013-14.pdf
  • Ite, U. E. (2004). Multinational and corporate social responsibility in developing countries: A case study of Nigeria. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environment Management, 11(1), 1-11.
  • Jamali, D. (2008). A stakeholder approach to corporate social responsibility: A fresh perspective into theory and practice. Journal of Business Ethics, 82(1), 213-231.
  • Johnson, M. P. (2006). Decision models for the location of community correction centers. Environment and Planning, 33(3).
  • Maheshwari, G. C. (1993). Corporate characteristics & social responsibility reporting. Asian Review of Accounting, 1(1), 31-42.
  • Manakkalathil, J., & Rudolf, E. (1995). Corporate social responsibility in a globalizing market. SAM Advanced Management Journal, 47, 29-32.
  • Okoye, A. (2009). Theorising corporate social responsibility as an essentially contested concept: Is a definition necessary? Journal of Business Ethics, 89(4), 613-627.
  • Oppewal, H., Alexander, A., & Sullivan, P. (2006).Consumer perceptions of corporate social responsibility in town shopping centres and their influence on shopping evaluations. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 13, 261-274.
  • Paul, K. C., & Pal, B. (2001), Corporate environmental reporting in India. Indian Accounting Review, 27-45.
  • Pramanik, A. K., Shil, N. C., & Das, B. (2007). Environmental accounting and reporting with special reference to India. Munich Personal RePEc Archive, 7712, 1-26.
  • Prieto-Carrón M., Lund-Thomsen, P., Chan, A., & Bhushan, C. (2006). Critical perspectives on CSR and development: What to know, what we don’t know and what we need to know. International Affairs, 82(5), 977-987.
  • Rahman, S. (2011). Evaluation of definitions: Ten dimensions of corporate social responsibility. World Review of Business Research, 1(1), 166-176.
  • Sharp, J. (2006). Corporate social responsibility and development: An anthropological perspective. Developmental Southern Africa, 23(2), 213-222.
  • Sheehy, B. (2015). Defining CSR: Problems and solutions. Journal of Business Ethics, 131(3), 625-648.
  • Singh, D. R., & Ahuja, J. M. (1983). Corporate social reporting in India. International Journal of Accounting, 18(2), 151-170.
  • Spector, B. (2008). Business responsibilities in a divided world, the cold war roots of the corporate social responsibility movement. Enterprise and Society, 9(2),314-336.
  • Tellis, W. (1997). Introduction to case study. The Qualitative Report, 3(2), 1-14. Van Marrewijik, M. (2003). Concepts and definitions of CSR and corporate sustainability: Between agency and communion. Journal of Business Ethics, 44(2-3), 95-105.
  • Votaw, D. (1972). Genius became rare: A comment on the doctrine of social responsibility. California Management Review, 15(2), 25-31.
  • World Bank. (2011). The changing wealth of nations: Measuring sustainable development in the new millennium. Washington, DC: World Bank.
  • World Business Council for Sustainable Development (WBCSD). (2000). Corporate social responsibility: Making good business sense. Retrieved from www. wbcsd.org:www. wbcsd.org
  • Yin, R. K. (2009). Case study research: Design and methods. Thousand Oaks CA: Sage.
  • Zainal, Z. (2007). Case study as a research method. Jurnal Kemanusiaan, 9, 1-6.

Abstract Views: 99

PDF Views: 0




  • CSR and its Social Implication - Evidence from a Maharatna Company in India

Abstract Views: 99  |  PDF Views: 0

Authors

Zakir H Molla
Center for Environment and Development, Kolkata, West Bengal, India
Sarbani Mitra
Professor, Department of Environment Management and Head, Department of Executive Management, Indian Institute of Social Welfare and Business Management, Kolkata, West Bengal, India

Abstract


The aim of this paper is to review the status of corporate CSR practices in a large Maharatna company in India, by critically appraising the resource application in the spectrum of focus areas, Schedule VII of the CSR rules, and the consequent impacts. The study focuses on the geographic spread of social investments over a period of time. Finally, the study explores the extent of social implications due to CSR initiatives. For the purpose of the study, we selected IOCL, a major oil and gas company, and the largest corporate identity in India in terms of turnover. The findings showed that through its social development activities, besides major CSR projects, its CSR initiatives have touched millions of lives by providing various infrastructure and grassroots development activities in the focus areas identified in the CSR policy of the company. Provision of water facilities; infrastructure at hospitals, schools, colleges, and skill development institutes/industrial training institutes; and setting up sports facilities across the country were some of the projects undertaken by IOCL. Environment-related initiatives like providing LPG connection to the disadvantaged section of society, improving sanitation, health, and livelihood, and providing livelihood generation skills stand tall among various initiatives undertaken. However, the investments are concentrated in and around the operating area, as per policy, in synchronisation with the prevailing act, thereby creating spatial inequality.

Keywords


Corporate Social Responsibility, Social Issues, Companies Act, Sustainable Development, CSR Initiatives, CSR Investment

References