International Journal of Business Ethics in Developing Economies

Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription Access
Open Access Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Restricted Access Subscription Access

Board Size and Corporate Performance: An Empirical Investigation


Affiliations
1 Commerce and Business Management Department, Guru Nanak Dev University, Amritsar, Punjab, India
     

   Subscribe/Renew Journal


The subject of corporate governance has always been of keen interest to the researchers in the area of management and finance. This paper basically concentrates on the corporate board of directors which is an internal corporate governance mechanism. Since the effectiveness of boards counts on several characteristics such as board size, board composition, leadership structure etc, therefore considering this viewpoint, the present study is based on the analysis of board size of BSE listed companies in India. This analysis broadly embraces the relationship between board size and performance as represented by various indicators such as Operating Profit Margin, Return on Assets, Return on Equity, Earnings per Share and Tobin's Q. Spearman's rho correlation, One Way ANOVA and Kruskal-Wallis tests were applied to draw the inferences. Results of the study remained robust and thus concluded that both board size and firm performance were independent of each other as board size was not found to be associated with firm performance.

Keywords

Corporate Governance, Board Size, Firm Performance
Subscription Login to verify subscription
User
Notifications
Font Size


  • Al-Matari, Y. A., Al-Swidi, A. K., Bt Fadzil, F. H., & Al- Matari, E. M. (2012). Board of directors, audit committee characteristics and performance of Saudi Arabia listed companies. International Review of Management and Marketing, 2, 241-251.

  • Barnhart, S. W., & Rosenstein, S. (1998). Board composition, managerial ownership, and firm performance: An empirical analysis. The Financial Review, 33, 1-16.

  • Bennedsen, M., Kongsted, H. C., & Neilsen, K. M. (2004). Board Size Effects in Closely Held Corporations (CAM Working Papers series with no. 2004-25). Retrieved from http://www.econ.ku.dk/cam/wp0910/wp0203/2004-25.pdf/

  • Bonn, I., Yoshikawa, T., & Phan, P. H. (2004). Effects of board structure on firm performance: A comparison between Japan and Australia. Asian Business & Management, 3, 105-125.

  • Chakrabarti, R., Subramanian, K. V., & Tung, F. (2010). Independent Directors and Firm Value: Evidence from an Emerging Market (Working Paper). Retrieved from http://papers .ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1631710

  • Cheng, S., Evans, J. H., & Nagarajan, N. J. (2008). Board size and firm performance: The moderating effects of the market for corporate control. Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting, 31, 121-145.

  • Dalton, C. M., & Dalton, D. R. (2005). Board of directors: Utilizing empirical evidence in developing practical prescriptions. British Journal of Management, 16, 91-97.

  • Dalton, D. R., Daily, C. M., Johnson, J. L., & Ellstrand, A. E. (1999). Number of directors and financial performance: A meta analysis. Academy of Management Journal, 42, 674-686.

  • Dey, D. K., & Chauhan, Y. K. (2009). Board composition and performance in Indian firms: A comparison. The IUP Journal of Corporate Governance, 8, 7-19.

  • Dhawan, J. (2006). Board of directors and corporate governance in large listed firms in India. The ICFAI Journal of Corporate governance, 5, 38-61.

  • Donaldson, L., & Davis, J. H. (1991). Stewardship theory or agency theory: CEO governance and shareholder returns. Australian Journal of Management, 16, 49-64.

  • Dwivedi, N., & Jain, A. K. (2005). Corporate governance and performance of Indian firms: The effect of board size and ownership. Employee Responsibilities and Rights Journal, 17, 161-172.

  • Eisenberg, T., Sundgren S., & Wells, M. T. (1998). Larger board size and decreasing firm value in small firms. Journal of Financial Economics, 48, 35-54.

  • Fama, E. F., & Jensen, M. C. (1983). Separation of ownership and control. Journal of Law and Economics, 26, 301-325.

  • Garg, A. K. (2007). Influence of board size and independence on firm performance: A study of Indian companies. Vikalpa, 32, 39-60.

  • Ghosh, S. (2006). Do board characteristics affect corporate performance? Firm-level evidence for India. Applied Economics Letters, 13, 435-443.

  • Ghosh, S. (2007). Board diligence, director busyness and corporate governance: An empirical analysis for India. Review of Applied Economics, 3, 91-104.

  • Guest, P. M. (2009). The impact of board size on firm performance: Evidence from the UK. The European Journal of Finance, 15, 385-404.

  • Hermalin, B.E., & Weisbach, M. S. (2003). Board of directors as an endogenously determined institution: A survey of the economic literature. FRBNY Economic Policy Review, 9, 7-26.

  • Jackling, B., & Johl, S. (2009). Board structure and firm performance: Evidence from India’s top companies. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 17, 492-509.

  • Jensen, M. C. (1993). The modern industrial revolution, exit, and the failure of internal control systems. Journal of Finance, 48, 831-880.

  • Jensen, M.C., & Meckling, W. H. (1976). Theory of the firm: Managerial behaviour, agency costs and ownership structure. Journal of Financial Economics, 3, 305-360.

  • Kathuria, V., & Dash, S. (1999). Board size and corporate financial performance: An investigation. Vikalpa, 24, 11-17.

  • Kumar, N., & Singh, J. P. (2013). Effect of board size and promoter ownership on firm value: Some empirical findings from India. Corporate Governance, 13, 88-98.

  • Larmou, S., & Vafeas, N. (2010). The relation between board size and firm performance in firms with a history of poor operating performance. Journal of Management & Governance, 14, 61-85.

  • Lipton, M., & Lorsch, J. W. (1992). A modest proposal for improved corporate governance. Business Lawyer, 48, 59-77.

  • Mak Y. T., & Kusnadi, Y. (2005). Size really matters: Further evidence on the negative relationship between board size and firm value. Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, 13, 301-318.

  • Mayur, M., & Saravanan, P. (2006). Does board size really matter? An empirical investigation on the Indian banking sector. The IUP Journal of Corporate Governance, 5, 41-51.

  • Pfeffer, J. (1972). Size and composition of corporate boards of directors: The organization and its environment. Administrative Science Quarterly, 17, 218-228.

  • Raheja, C. G. (2003). The Interaction of Insiders and Outsiders in Monitoring: A Theory of Corporate Boards (Working Paper No. 2001-25). Retrieved from http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract _id=251594

  • Ranti, U. O., & Sameul, F. A. (2012). The effects of board size on financial performance of banks: A study of listed banks in Nigeria. International Journal of Economics and Finance, 4, 260-267.

  • Sarkar, J., & Sarkar, S. (2009). Multiple board appointments and firm performance in emerging economies: Evidence from India. Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, 17, 271-293.

  • Topak, M. S. (2011). The effect of board size on firm performance: Evidence from Turkey. Middle Eastern Finance and Economics, 14, 119-127.

  • Uadiale, O. M. (2010). The impact of board structure on corporate financial performance in Nigeria. International Journal of Business and Management, 5, 155-166.

  • Varottil, U. (2010). Evolution and effectiveness of independent directors in Indian corporate governance. Hastings Business Law Journal, 6, 1-91.

  • Yermack, D. (1996). Higher market valuation of companies with a small board of directors. Journal of Financial Economics, 40, 185-212.

  • Retrieved from http://publib.boulder.ibm.com/infocenter/spssstat/v20r0m0/index.jsp?topic=%2Fcom.ibm.spss.statistics.help%2Fidh_onew_opt.htm

  • Retrieved from http://www.ecgi.org/codes/documents/cadbury.pdf

  • Retrieved from http://www.oecd.org/corporate/corporateaffairs/corporategovernanceprinciples/31557724.pdf


Abstract Views: 1026

PDF Views: 6




  • Board Size and Corporate Performance: An Empirical Investigation

Abstract Views: 1026  |  PDF Views: 6

Authors

Shivan Sarpal
Commerce and Business Management Department, Guru Nanak Dev University, Amritsar, Punjab, India
Fulbag Singh
Commerce and Business Management Department, Guru Nanak Dev University, Amritsar, Punjab, India

Abstract


The subject of corporate governance has always been of keen interest to the researchers in the area of management and finance. This paper basically concentrates on the corporate board of directors which is an internal corporate governance mechanism. Since the effectiveness of boards counts on several characteristics such as board size, board composition, leadership structure etc, therefore considering this viewpoint, the present study is based on the analysis of board size of BSE listed companies in India. This analysis broadly embraces the relationship between board size and performance as represented by various indicators such as Operating Profit Margin, Return on Assets, Return on Equity, Earnings per Share and Tobin's Q. Spearman's rho correlation, One Way ANOVA and Kruskal-Wallis tests were applied to draw the inferences. Results of the study remained robust and thus concluded that both board size and firm performance were independent of each other as board size was not found to be associated with firm performance.

Keywords


Corporate Governance, Board Size, Firm Performance

References